* Corresponding Author
The Effects of Cyberloafing in Indonesian Public Sector Workplaces: Analysis of Self-Regulatory Mechanisms and Anticipated Cost on Taking Charge Behavior
https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.110013 Desy Mayasari(1*), Putriesti Mandasari(2)
(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Cyberloafing, or non-work-related internet activities, has been associated with taking charge behavior that reduce employees’ work performance. This study examines how cyberloafing and anticipated cost relate to employees’ taking charge behavior in the workplace. Rather than treating these variables as inherently opposing influences, the study conceptualizes them as distinct forms of self-regulatory responses to workplace demands. Data were collected from 240 employees in Indonesia’s public sector, with an average age of 46 years and an average tenure of 18.7 years, representing a mature and experienced workforce. The findings show that cyberloafing is negatively associated with taking charge behavior, suggesting that frequent engagement in non-work-related internet activities may reduce employees’ capacity or willingness to initiate constructive changes. In contrast, anticipated cost is positively related to taking charge, indicating that employees who are more attentive to potential risks may also be more deliberate and prepared when engaging in proactive efforts. These results suggest that proactive behavior is shaped not only by tendencies toward disengagement but also by individuals’ evaluation of potential consequences. By integrating these perspectives, the study offers a more balanced understanding of how employees regulate their behavior under dynamic work conditions. It highlights the coexistence of avoidance-oriented and evaluative processes in shaping proactive action. From a practical standpoint, the findings underscore the importance of managing cyberloafing without suppressing employees’ capacity for recovery, while also fostering constructive awareness of risks to support more effective taking charge behavior. This study contributes to the literature by providing a nuanced account of employee behavior in Indonesia’s public sector, where such dynamics remain underexplored
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adetoro, N. (2010). Internet Utilisation and Abuses in Selected Cybercafés in Ogun State, Nigeria. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 20(1).
Anandarajan, M. (2002). Internet abuse in the workplace. Communications of the ACM, 45(1), 53-54.
Anandarajan, M., Devine, P., & Simmers, C. A. (2004). A multidimensional scaling approach to personal web usage in the workplace. Personal web usage in the workplace: a guide to effective human resources management, 61.
Anandarajan, M., & Simmers, C. A. (2004). Constructive and dysfunctional personal web usage in the workplace: mapping employee attitudes. Personal web usage in the workplace: a guide to effective human resources management, 1. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315699530.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman. Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202.
Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1067-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2007.03.008.
Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Daily self-management and employee work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jvb.2013.11.002.
Burnett, M. F., Chiaburu, D. S., Shapiro, D. L., & Li, N. (2015). Revisiting how and when perceived organizational support enhances taking charge: An inverted U-shaped perspective. Journal of Management, 41(7), 1805–1826. https://doi. org/10.1177/0149206313493324.
Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Soto-Acosta, P., & Wensley, A. K. P. (2021). Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility. Journal of Business Research, 128, 191–201. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.005.
Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I.-S., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardner, R. G. (2013). The fivefactor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0033907.
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462. https://doi. org/10.1177/014920630002600304.
Envoy. (2025). 2025 workplace predictions report. https://envoy.com/press-release/2025- workplace-predictions-report.
Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6.
Fuller, B., & Marler, L. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329–345. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008.
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. In B. J. Dik, Z. S. Byrne, & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Purpose and meaning in the workplace (pp. 191–210). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11609-009.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.https:// doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634438.
Hacker, W. (2013). Action regulation theory: A practical tool for improving work and learning. Routledge.
Henle, C. A., & Blanchard, A. L. (2008). The Interaction of Work Stressors and Organizational Sanctions on Cyberloafing. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20(3), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.008.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513– 524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003- 066X.44.3.513.
Ivanti. (2025). 2025 technology at work report: Reshaping flexible work. https://www.ivanti. com/resources/research-reports/tech-atwork.
Jacques, P. H., Garger, J., Mullen, A., & Petrarca, P. (2023). The future of work and teleworking: A conceptual study of employee preferences, managerial strategies, and RTO mandates. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 23(2), 74–83.
Koay, K. Y., Lim, V. K. G., & Soh, P. H. (2017). The role of social media use in job performance: A study of employees in Singapore. Information & Management, 54(4), 450–465. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.11.007.
Lim, V. K., & Chen, D. J. (2012). Cyberloafing at the workplace: gain or drain on work? Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(4), 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492 9X.2011.597058.
Lim, V. K., Teo, T. S., & Loo, G. L. (2002). How do I loaf here? Let me count the ways. Communications of the ACM, 45(1), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.1145/502269.502300.
Lim, V. K. G. (2002). The IT Way of Loafing on the Job: Cyberloafing, Neutralizing and Organizational Justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(5), 675-694. doi:10.2307/4093671.
Lord, R. G., Diefendorff, J. M., Schmidt, A. M., & Hall, R. J. (2010). Self-regulation at work. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 543– 568. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. psych.093008.100314.
Mahatanankoon, P., Anandarajan, M., & Igbaria, M. (2004). Development of a measure of personal web usage in the workplace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(1), 93-104.
Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. Drenth, H. Thierry, & C. J. de Wolff (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 5–33). Psychology Press. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780203765425-2.
Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543-1567. https://doi. org/10.5465/256798.
Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1998). Taking Charge At Work: Understanding Voluntary Change Initiative. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi. org/10.5465/ambpp.1998.27658099.
Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419. https://doi. org/10.5465/256798.
Moon, H. K., Hur, W. M., & Jun, J. K. (2008). The effects of leadership on taking charge behavior: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(4), 324–335. https://doi. org/10.1177/1548051808328837.
Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1987). Whistleblowing: Myth and reality. Journal of Management, 13(4), 681-708. https://doi. org/10.1177/014920638701300409.
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human performance, 10(2), 85-97. https:// doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2.
Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth selfefficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835. https://doi. org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835.
Spreitzer, G. M. (2008). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. In C. L. Cooper & J. Barling (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 54-72). Sage.
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015). Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S72–S103. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924.
Van Hootegem, A., De Witte, H., & De Witte, K. (2019). The relationship between job insecurity and innovative work behavior: The moderating role of psychological safety and threat-rigidity effects. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(3), 683–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ joop.12254.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley. Wagner, D. T., Barnes, C. M., Lim, V. K., & Ferris, D. L. (2012). Lost sleep and cyberloafing: Evidence from the laboratory and a daylight saving time quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1068. https://doi. org/10.1037/a0027557%E2%80%8B .
Wasson, C. (2006). Being in two spaces at once: Virtual meetings and their representation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 16(1), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1525/ jlin.2006.16.1.103.
Yan, Y., Chen, J., & Li, X. (2025). Ambivalence toward digital and AI-driven transformation: A threat–rigidity perspective on employee taking charge. Journal of Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi. org/10.1037/apl0001234
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.110013
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 165
| 
views : 70
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Desy Mayasari; Putriesti Mandasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Kawistara is published by the Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada.