Bibliometric analysis of publication in human anatomy over the past ten years in Indonesia and Southeast Asia
Abstract
Human anatomy is a fundamental basic science underpinning medical education and biomedical research. Despite a growing volume of anatomical publications, systematic evaluations of research output and thematic development among anatomy departments in Indonesia and Southeast Asian countries remain limited. With comparative insights from Southeast Asian nations, this study sought to describe the publication trends, collaboration patterns, and topic progression of anatomical research written by scholars connected to Indonesian Departments of Anatomy over the last ten years. Publications indexed in PubMed from 2016 to 2025 were used in a bibliometric study. To find literature about anatomy from Indonesia and Southeast Asia, affiliation-based search techniques were used. VOSviewer was used to map authorship collaboration, institutional contributions, and research themes based on Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) through network visualization and keyword co-occurrence studies. There were 4,067 publications from Southeast Asia and 737 publications from Indonesia. Despite making up a lesser share of regional output, Indonesia had the fastest rate of growth in publications over the research period. Productivity was concentrated among a small number of writers and institutions, according to co-authorship analysis. Keyword mapping revealed a preponderance of animal model-based experimental and preclinical research with a focus on molecular and cellular mechanisms. Cell differentiation, biomarkers, and mesenchymal stem cells were among the emerging areas associated with translational research. Anatomical research in Indonesia has expanded rapidly and is progressively integrating molecular and translational perspectives. These findings provide an evidence-based foundation for strengthening research capacity, fostering collaboration, and guiding strategic development within anatomical sciences.
References
Eizenberg N. Anatomy and its impact on medicine: Will it continue? Australas Med J 2015; 8(12):373-7.
https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2015.2550
Iwanaga J, Bubb K, Rajaram-Gilkes M, Noel G, Chaiyamoon A, Ezra D, et al. What Is Clinical Anatomy?-A Consensus Statement From the American Association of Clinical Anatomists. Clin Anat 2026; 39(1):72-6.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70040
Arráez-Aybar LA, Sánchez-Montesinos I, Mirapeix RM, Mompeo-Corredera B, Sañudo-Tejero JR. Relevance of human anatomy in daily clinical practice. Ann Anat. 2010; 192(6):341-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2010.05.002
Abdallah YMY. History of Medical Imaging. Arch Med Health Sci 2017; 5:272-8.
https://doi.org/10.4103/amhs.amhs_97_17
Dziedzic M, Ostrowski P, Ghosh SK, Balawender K, Koziej M, Bonczar M. Exploring the evolution of anatomy: From historical foundations to modern insights. Trans Res Anat 2024;35:100286.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2024.100286
Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics 2015; 105(3):1809-31.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 2021;133:285-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Rahmani MZ, Bukhari A, Wiyono N, Amru K, Baharuddin B, Nurhadi AA. Exploring links between visuospatial ability and anatomy learning in education: A bibliometric analysis and scientific mapping. Narra J 2024; 4(3):e1095.
https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v4i3.1095
Sousa Neto AR, Carvalho ARB, Ferreira da Silva MD, Rêgo Neta MM, Sena IVO, Almeida RN, et al. Bibliometric Analysis of Global Scientific Production on COVID-19 and Vaccines. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20(6):4796.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064796
Maula, Ahmad Watsiq, Anis Fuad, and Adi Utarini. Ten-years trend of dengue research in Indonesia and South-East Asian Countries: A bibliometric analysis. Global Health Action 2018; 11(1):1504398.
https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1504398
Devarhubli G, Kashyap AK, Tomar AS. Ten years of the cogent social sciences: a bibliometric analysis. Cogent Soc Sci 2025; 11(1): 2564774.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2564774
Haposan JH, Fadhli R. Global research trends on vaccination in athletes: A bibliometric analysis of publications from 1965 to 2024. J Med Science and Sports Health 2025; 1(2)49-58.
https://doi.org/10.21831/jomassh.v1i2.1253
Hidigow AMH, Dirie NI, Warsame ZA. Bibliometric analysis of research trends in clinical learning environment for nursing and midwifery education. J Multidiscip Healthc 2024; 17:4973-87.
https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s486321
Carmona JU, Carmona-Ramírez LH, López C. Trends and collaborations in mesenchymal stem cell research applied to animal models of osteoarthritis: a bibliometric analysis (2015-2024). Vet Med Int 2025; 2025:8110208.
https://doi.org/10.1155/vmi/8110208
Aristovnik A, Ravšelj D, Umek L. A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 across science and social science research landscape. Sustainability 2020; 12(21):9132.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219132
Ganti L, Persaud NA, Stead TS. Bibliometric analysis methods for the medical literature. Academic Medicine & Surgery 2025.
https://doi.org/10.62186/001c.129134
Manoj Kumar L, George RJ, Anisha PS. Bibliometric analysis for medical research. Indian J Psychol Med 2023; 45(3):277-82.



