Date Log

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Upon acceptance of an article, authors transfer copyright to the JIEB as part of a journal publishing agreement, but authors still have the right to share their article for personal use, internal institutional use, and for any use permitted under the CC BY-SA license
Open Access
Articles are freely available to the public without any subscription with permitted reuse. For open access articles, permitted third party (re)use is defined by the following Creative Commons user licenses: Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-SA).
Analysis of Financial Accounting Standard-Setting Institutions: Government Versus Private
Corresponding Author(s) : Ade Ilham Ilahi
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business,
Vol 41 No 1 (2026): January
Abstract
Introduction/Main Objectives: This study analyzes the legitimacy of Indonesia’s financial accounting standard-setting institutions. Background Problems: The enactment of the Law on Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector has resulted in changes to the financial regulations, including an institutional arrangement for financial accounting standard setting. The law regulates that the standard setting should be conducted by a standard-setting committee established by a presidential decree. This is different from the current system, where the standard-setting process is conducted by a board under the Institute of Indonesia Chartered Accountants, a private organization of professional accountants in Indonesia. The new scheme may increase the government's role in the standard-setting process, which may hinder independence. Novelty: This study adds to the literature on the legitimacy of standard-setting institutions by focusing on the stakeholders’ perspectives. Research Methods: A qualitative approach, through semi-structured interviews with stakeholders from various professional backgrounds that relate to financial reporting, was conducted to compare the legitimacy of private versus government institutions that set financial accounting standards. Finding/Results: Each of the institutions—both the government’s and the private one under the IAI—has various positive and negative effects on the legitimacy of the standard-setting process. Collaboration between the government and the private sector, such as involving the IAI in determining the financial accounting standard-setter, has stronger legitimacy than a sole government standard-setting institution. Conclusion: The results of this study contribute to the development of the legitimacy theory and provide inputs for the further implementation of the new law.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Akisik, O. (2013). Accounting regulation, financial development, and economic growth. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 49(1), 33–67. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X490103
- Bell, E., Harley, B., & Bryman, A. & B. (2022). Business research methods (6th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Choi, F. D. S., & Meek, G. K. (2011). International accounting (7th ed.). Chelmsford: Pearson.
- Danjou, P., & Walton, P. (2012). The legitimacy of the IASB. Accounting in Europe, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2012.664396
- Díez-de-Castro, E., Peris-Ortiz, M., & Díez-Martín, F. (2018). Criteria for evaluating the organizational legitimacy: A typology for legitimacy jungle. In Organizational Legitimacy: Challenges and Opportunities for Businesses and Institutions (pp. 1–21). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75990-6_1
- Dumitru, M., & Guse, R. G. (2017). The legitimacy of the International Integrated Reporting Council. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 16(1), 30–58. Retrieved from: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ami:journl:v:16:y:2017:i:1:p:30-58
- Durocher, S., & Fortin, A. (2010). Standard‐setting institutions’ user‐oriented legitimacy management strategies. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(4), 476–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091011094545
- Durocher, S., Fortin, A., Allini, A., & Zagaria, C. (2019). Users’ legitimacy perceptions about standard-setting processes. Accounting and Business Research, 49(2), 206–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1526664
- Durocher, S., Fortin, A., & Côté, L. (2007). Users’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process: A theory-building study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1–2), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.004
- Hannigan, J. A., & Kueneman, R. M. (1977). Legitimacy and public organizations: A case study. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 2(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/3340514
- Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
- IAI. (n.d.). Tentang IAI [About The IICA]. Retrieved January 11, 2024, from https://web.iaiglobal.or.id/Profil-IAI/Tentang%20IAI#gsc.tab=0
- IAI. Peraturan Organisasi IAI Nomor 3 Tahun 2021 [The IICA Organizational Regulation Number 3 of 2021]. (2021). Retrieved from https://web.iaiglobal.or.id/assets/files/tentang_iai/reg_dan_po/B08-PO%20No.%203%20th%202021%20DSAK%20DSAS.pdf.
- Johnson, S. B., & Solomons, D. (1984). Institutional legitimacy and the FASB. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 3(3), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(84)90015-2
- Madsen, P. E. (2013). The pursuit of high-quality accounting standards. Accounting Horizons, 27(4), 867–876. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-10368
- Maradona, A. F., & Chand, P. (2018). The pathway of transition to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 30, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2017.12.005
- Maulana, A. O. (2019). Legitimacy dynamics of accounting standards setting: The case of Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading). University of Reading, Berkshire, England. Retrieved from https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/87829/1/2363609_Maulana_thesis.pdf
- McEnroe, J. E., & Martens, S. C. (1996). An analysis of the FASB’s independence. Journal of Applied Business Research, 13(1), 129–132. Retrieved from: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/analysis-fasbs-independence/docview/227568457/se-2?accountid=13771
- McKim, C. (2023). Meaningful Member-Checking: A Structured Approach to Member-Checking. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 2023(2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12973
- Mitterlechner, A. (2019). How private national accounting standard-setters manage legiti-macy: An institutional work perspective (Doctoral dissertation, University of St. Gallen). University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland. Retrieved from https://www.e-helvetica.nb.admin.ch/api/download/urn%3Anbn%3Ach%3Abel-1411999%3ADis4902.pdf/Dis4902.pdf
- Nejad, M. Y., Ahmad, A., Fairuz, M., Salleh, M., & Rahim, R. A. (2018). International Financial Reporting Standards Foreign Direct Investment in Asean Countries. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 20(3), 303–329. Retrieved from http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb
- Perera, M. H. B. (1989). Accounting in developing countries: A case for localised uniformity. The British Accounting Review, 21(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-8389(89)90193-5
- Rankin, M., Ferlauto, K., McGowan, S., & Stanton, P. A. (2018). Contemporary issues in accounting (Edisi Kedua). Milton: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
- Richardson, A. J., & Eberlein, B. (2011). Legitimating transnational standard-setting: The case of the International Accounting Standards Board. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(2), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-010-0543-9/METRICS
- Sanada, M. (2018). The legal backing for accounting standard-setting in Japan: A historical review. Accounting History, 23(3), 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373217743022
- Sanada, M. (2020). Legitimacy of private accounting standard setters: Literature review and suggestions for future research. Accounting in Europe, 17(3), 264–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2020.1837889
- Silverman, D. (2017). Doing qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
- Suwardi, E. (2020). The Evolution in the Value Relevance of Accounting Measures in Indonesia. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 22(1), 49–73. Retrieved from: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb
- Suwardjono. (2014). Teori akuntansi pereka-yasaan pelaporan keuangan [Accounting theory of financial reporting engineering] (3rd ed.). Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta.
- Wingard, C., Bosman, J., & Amisi, B. (2016). The legitimacy of IFRS. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(1), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2014-0032
- Wolk, H. I., Dodd, J. L., & Rozycki, J. J. (2017). Accounting theory: Conceptual issues in a political and economic environment. California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506300108
- World Bank. (2018). Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes Accounting and Auditing: Indonesia. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/478551576872263951/Indonesia-Report-on-the-observance-of-standards-and-codes-accounting-and-auditing.pdf
- Young, J. J. (2014). Separating the political and technical: Accounting standard‐setting and purification. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 713–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12046
- Zeff, S. A. (1995). A perspective on the U.S. Public/private-sector approach to the regulation of financial reporting. American Accounting Association, 9(1), 52–70.