Pentti Linkola's Ecofascism And The Environmental Crisis: A Re-Evaluation Of The Concept Of Humanity

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.97005

Ahmad Rama Dony(1*), Septiana Dwiputri Maharani(2)

(1) Faculty of Philosophy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Faculty of Philosophy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The global environmental crisis has posed an urgent challenge for humanity to reconsider its relationship with nature. The idea of ecofascism proposed by Pentti Linkola has attracted attention because it offers a controversial solution to environmental problems. This research explores and re-evaluates the concept of humanity within the framework of ecofascism proposed by Pentti Linkola, using a human philosophy review approach. This research uses a qualitative method with the analytical framework of description, interpretation, and critical analysis of Linkola's humanitarian views. This research identifies the perspective of human philosophy in ecofascism. In addition, this research also explores the implications of reassessing the concept of humanity on human mindset and actions in overcoming the global environmental crisis. By integrating human philosophy perspectives, this research aims to provide a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between ecofascism, the concept of humanity, and the environmental challenges facing humanity. This study's results show that one way to overcome the environmental crisis offered by Linkola is implementing a fascist government with ecological considerations. Linkola offers to regulate the human population, ban foreign languages, control obesity and height, and limit the use of fossil fuels. Linkola is also firm in rejecting human rights and individual freedoms as the cause of natural destruction. While prioritizing ecosystems over individual rights, this approach cannot be easily justified. Effective solutions to environmental challenges require a more holistic approach, including increased resource efficiency, adoption of green technologies, and changes in sustainable consumption behavior, thus maintaining ecological balance while respecting human rights.



Keywords


ecofascism, human philosophy, humanity, environment, Pentti Linkola



References

Ali, S. H., & Oliveira, J. A. P. de. (2018). Pollution and economic development: An empirical research review. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12), 123003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaeea7

Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224

Arora, N. K., Fatima, T., Mishra, I., Verma, M., Mishra, J., & Mishra, V. (2018). Environmental sustainability: Challenges and viable solutions. Environmental Sustainability, 1(4), 309–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-018-00038-w

Ashri, M. (2018). Hak asasi manusia: Filosofi, teori & instrumen dasar. CV. Social Poliltic Genius (SIGn).

Barlian, E., & Iswandi U. (2021). Ekologi manusia. Deepublish.

Bertens, K. (2007). Etika. Gramedia.

Bruning, W. (1956). The fundamental types of present philosophic anthropology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 17(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/2104692

Davidson, S. (2008). Hak asasi manusia: Sejarah, teori, dan praktek dalam pergaulan internasional (A. H. Pudjaatmaka, Trans.). Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

deGuzman, M. M. (2019). Complementarity at the African Court. In C. C. Jalloh, K. M. Clarke, & V. O. Nmehielle (Eds.), The African Court of Justice and Human and Peoples’ Rights in context (1st ed., pp. 645–679). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525343.024

Dewi, S. (2018). Ekofenomenologi: Mengurai disekuilibrium relasi manusia dengan alam. CV Marjin Kiri.

el-Ojeili, C., & Taylor, D. (2020). “The future in the past”: Anarcho-primitivism and the critique of civilization Today. Rethinking Marxism, 32(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2020.1727256

FAHIK, G. A. (2014). Etika tanggung jawab masa depan perspektif Hans Jonas [Undergraduate, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira]. http://repository.unwira.ac.id/9696/

Flowers, N., Marcia, B., Kristi Rudilius, P., & Tolman, J. (2000). The human rights education book: Effective practices for learning, action, and change. The Human Resource Center.

Forchtner, B. (2019). Eco-fascism: Justifications of terrorist violence in the Christchurch mosque shooting and the El Paso shooting. OpenDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/countering-radical-right/eco-fascism-justifications-terrorist-violence-christ church-mosque-shooting-and-el-paso-shooting/

Haag, C. A. (2020). The later philosophy of Pentti Linkola. ‎Independently published.

Keraf, S. (2010). Etika lingkungan hidup. PT Kompas Media Nusantara.

Laaksonen, J. (2022). Holistisen ympäristöetiikan ekofasistiset tendenssit—Aldo Leopoldin & Pentti Linkolan holistiset näkemykset. https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/141325

Linkola, P. (2011). Can life prevail?: A revolutionary approch to the environmental crisis. Tammi Publisher.

Mann, M. (2004). Fascists. Cambridge University Press.

Moore, S., & Roberts, A. (2022). The rise of ecofascism: Climate change and the far right. Polity.

Mosse, G. L. (1981). The crisis of German ideology: Intellectual origins of the Third Reich. Schocken Books.

Muthmainnah, L., Mustansyir, R., & Tjahyadi, S. (2020). Meninjau ulang sustainable development: Kajian filosofis atas dilema pengelolaan lingkungan hidup di era post modern. Jurnal Filsafat, 30(1), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.49109

Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle. Cambridge University Press.

NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. (1991, December 10). Radical climate changes may be cause of the plague. NASA. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/radical-climate-changes-may-be-cause-of-the-plague/

Panicker, T. V. (2024). Adopting eco-friendly technologies for a sustainable environment. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 30(Suppl.), S322–S326. https://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2024.v30i07s.057

Prinse, A. de. (2019). Political polarization and the environment. Wageningen University and Research.

Protopapadakis, E. D. (2014). Environmental ethics and Linkola’s ecofascism: An ethics beyond humanism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 9(4), 586–601.

Renton, D. (2020). Fascism: History and theory. Pluto Press.

Riski, N. (2023). Pentingnya perlindungan hak asasi manusia dalam sistem hukum kenegaraan. Mandalika Law Journal, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.59613/mlj.v1i1.1542

Schacht, R. (1990). Philosophical anthropology: What, why and how. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 50, 155–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108037

Schweitzer, A. (1964). The ethics of reverence for life. Christendom.

Sepulveda, M., Banning, V., & Genugten, V. (2004). Human rights reference handbook (3rd rev.). University for Peace. http://upeace.org

Sihotang, K. (2018). Filsafat manusia (rev. ed.). PT Kanisius.

Silvan, R., & Bennett, D. (1994). The greening of ethics. The White Horse Press.

Singer, P. (2009). Animal liberation: The definitive classic of the animal movement. Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

Snijders, A. (2004). Antropologi filsafat: Manusia, paradoks dan seruan. PT Kanisius.

Suryandari, R. (2022). Ekofasisme ala Pentti Linkola: Mencintai lingkungan secara radikal. Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://pslh.ugm.ac.id/ekofasisme-ala-pentti-linkola-mencintai-lingkungan-secara-radikal/

Yuono, Y. R. (2019). Etika lingkungan: Melawan etika lingkungan antroposentris melalui interpretasi teologi penciptaan yang tepat sebagai landasan bagi pengelolaan-pelestarian lingkungan. Fidei: Jurnal Teologi Sistematika dan Praktika, 2(1), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.34081/fidei.v2i1.40



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.97005

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 646

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Filsafat

Jurnal Filsafat Indexed by:

Google ScholarSinta (Science and Technology Index)


Jurnal Filsafat ISSN 0853-1870 (print), ISSN 2528-6811 (online)