PENTTI LINKOLA'S ECOFASCISM AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS: A RE-EVALUATION OF THE CONCEPT OF HUMANITY

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.97005

Ahmad Rama Dony(1*), Septiana Dwiputri Maharani(2)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The global environmental crisis has posed an urgent challenge for humanity to reconsider its relationship with nature. The idea of ecofascism proposed by Pentti Linkola has attracted attention because it offers a controversial solution to environmental problems. This research explores and re-evaluates the concept of humanity within the framework of ecofascism thought proposed by Pentti Linkola, using a human philosophy review approach. This research method uses a qualitative method with the analytical knife of description, interpretation, and critical analysis of Linkola's humanitarian views. This research identifies the perspective of human philosophy in ecofascism thinking. In addition, this research also explores the implications of reassessing the concept of humanity on human mindset and actions in overcoming the global environmental crisis. By integrating human philosophy perspectives, this research aims to provide a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between ecofascism, the concept of humanity, and the environmental challenges facing humanity. This study's results show that one way to overcome the environmental crisis offered by Pentti Linkola is implementing a fascist government with ecological considerations. Linkola offers to regulate the human population, ban foreign languages, control obesity and height, and limit the use of fossil fuels. Linkola is also firm in rejecting human rights and individual freedoms as the cause of natural destruction. While prioritizing ecosystems over individual rights, this approach cannot be easily justified. Effective solutions to environmental challenges require a more holistic approach, including increased resource efficiency, adoption of green technologies, and changes in sustainable consumption behavior, thus maintaining ecological balance while respecting human rights.


Keywords


Ecofascism, Philosophy of Human, Humanity, Environment, Pentti Linkola.



References

Ali, S. H., & Oliveira, J. A. P. de. (2018). Pollution and economic development: An empirical research review. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12), 123003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaeea7

Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224

Ashri, M. (2018). Hak Asasi Manusia (Filosofi, Teori & Instrumen Dasar). CV.Social Poliltic Genius (SIGn).

Barlian, E., & Iswandi U. (2021). Ekologi Manusia (1st ed.). Deepublish.

Bertens, K. (2007). Etika. Gramedia.

Bruning, W. (1956). The Fundamental Types of Present Philosophic Anthropology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 17(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/2104692

Davidson, S. (2008). Hak Asasi Manusia: Sejarah, Teori, dan Praktek dalam Pergaulan Internasional (A. H. Pudjaatmaka, Trans.). Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

deGuzman, M. M. (2019). Complementarity at the African Court. In C. C. Jalloh, K. M. Clarke, & V. O. Nmehielle (Eds.), The African Court of Justice and Human and Peoples’ Rights in Context (1st ed., pp. 645–679). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525343.024

Dewi, S. (2018). Ekofenomenologi: Mengurai Disekuilibrium Relasi Manusia dengan Alam. CV Marjin Kiri.

Fahik, G. A. (2014). Etika Tanggung Jawab Masa Depan Perspektif Hans Jonas [Undergraduate, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira]. http://repository.unwira.ac.id/9696/

Flowers, N., Marcia, B., Kristi Rudilius, P., & Tolman, J. (2000). The Human Rights Education Book: Effective Practices for Learning, Action, and Change. The Human Resource Center.

Forchtner, B. (2019). Eco-Fascism: Justifications of Terrorist Violence in the Christchurch Mosque Shooting and the El Paso Shooting. OpenDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/countering-radi cal-right/eco-fascism-justifications-terrorist-violence-christ church-mosque-shooting-and-el-paso-shooting/

Keraf, S. (2010). Etika Lingkungan Hidup. PT Kompas Media Nusantara.

Linkola, P. (2011). Can Life Previal? (A Revolutionary Approch to the Environmental Crisis). Tammi Publisher.

Moore, S., & Roberts, A. (2022). The Rise of Ecofascism.

Muthmainnah, L., Mustansyir, R., & Tjahyadi, S. (2020). Meninjau Ulang Sustainable Development: Kajian Filosofis Atas Dilema Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup di Era Post Modern. Jurnal Filsafat, 30(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.49109

Schacht, R. (1990). Philosophical Anthropology: What, Why and How. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 50, 155–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108037

Schweitzer, A. (1964). The Ethics of Reverence for Life.

Sepulveda, M., Banning, V., & Genugten, V. (2004). Human Rights Reference Handbook (3rd Rev.). University for Peace. http://upeace.org

Sihotang, K. (2018). Filsafat Manusia (Revisi). PT Kanisius.

Snijders, A. (2004). Antropologi Filsafat, Manusia, Paradoks dan Seruan. PT Kanisius.

Suryandari, R. (2022). Ekofasisme ala Pentti Linkola: Mencintai Lingkungan Secara Radikal. Artikel. https://pslh.ugm.ac.id/ekofasisme-ala-pentti-linkola-mencintai-lingkungan-secara-radikal/

Yuono, Y. R. (2019). Etika Lingkungan: Melawan Etika Lingkungan Antroposentris Melalui Interpretasi Teologi Penciptaan Yang Tepat Sebagai Landasan Bagi Pengelolaan-Pelestarian Lingkungan. Fidei: Jurnal Teologi Sistematika dan Praktika, 2(1), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.34081/fidei.v2i1.40



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.97005

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 161

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Filsafat

Jurnal Filsafat Indexed by:

Google ScholarSinta (Science and Technology Index)


Jurnal Filsafat ISSN 0853-1870 (print), ISSN 2528-6811 (online)