(1) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Halu Oleo University (2) Department of Biomedic, Faculty of Medicine Halu Oleo University (3) Department of Biomedic, Faculty of Medicine Halu Oleo University (*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a woman’s health problem that is still widespread throughout the world, especially in developing countries such as Indonesia. The high incidence of cervical cancer is related with early detection program. Visual inspection of acetic acid (VIA) is used as an alternative screening method because it is easier, cheaper and its effectiveness is not much different from the Pap test. There are differences on coverage of VIA test in urban and rural areas. This study aimed to identify determinants of cervical cancer screening coverage in urban and rural areas. The study was a cross sectional study. Total of 372 women who did the VIA test in urban areas of Kendari and rural areas of South Konawe in January to June 2016 were included in this study. Coverage of cervical cancer screening was examined in relation to the level of education, knowledge, distance of health facilities and family support. The data was analyzed using Chi-square test with a significance value p < 0.05. The majority of respondents were the age groupof 31-40 years old, low parity, and first intercourse at ≥ 17 years old. There were significant difference of education level (p=0.000), knowledge (p=0.000) and distance of health facilitiesin urban and rural areas (p=0.000). There was no significant differences between family support in urban and rural areas (p=0.224). In conclusions, education level, knowledge, and distance of health facilities are determinants of cervical cancer screening coverage in urban and rural areas in Southeast Sulawesi.
Keywords
distance of health facilities - education - knowledge – cervical cancer - determinants
Andriyono. Kanker Serviks. Ed.2. Jakarta : Divisi Onkologi Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi FKUI; 2009. 2. Depkes RI-JNPK. Draft modul : Panduan Pencegahan Kanker Serviks Untuk Fasilitas Dengan Sumber Daya Rendah. Jakarta : Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2007. 3. Direktorat Jendral PP & PL. Buku acuan pencegahan kanker payudara dan kanker leher rahim. Jakarta : Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2011. 4. Nuranna L. Extending coverage and developing a network for achieving cervical cancer screening with documentation on visual inspection of acetic acid (Do-VIA) in Indonesia. Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 2(2): 62-3. 5. Nuranna L, Purwoto G, Anggreni TD, Utami TW, Aziz MF, Andriyono et al. Skrining kanker serviks dengan IVA dan model aplikasi di lapangan. Edisi 2. Jakarta : Divisi Onkologi Ginekologi Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; 2012: 21-2. 6. Anggraeni TD, Nuranna L, Chaterine C, Sobur CS, Rahardja F, Hia CW, et al. Distribution of age, stage, and histopathology of cervical cancer : a retrospective study on patien at Dr.Ciptomangunkusumo Hospital, JakartaIndonesia, 2006-2010. Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 35(1): 21-4 7. Djayadilaga et all. Langkah-langkah Praktis Paket Pelayanan Kesehatan Reproduksi Esensial. Ed. 2. Jakarta : Pusat kesehatan reproduksi FKUI; 2007. 8. Adefuye PO, Broutet NJ, de Sanjose S, Denny LA. Trials and projects on cervical cancer and human papillomavirus prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa. Vaccine 31 Suppl 5: 2013; F53–59. 9. Sherris J, Wittet S, Kleine A, Sellors J, Luciani S, et al. Evidence-based, alternative cervical cancer screening approaches in low-resource settings. International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health 35: 2009; 147–154. 10. Belinson JL, Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Wu LY, Qiao YL, et al. Cervical cancer screening by simple visual inspection after acetic acid. Obstetrics and Gynecology 98: 2001; 441–444. 11. Benard, et al. Vital Signs: Cervical Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Screening United States, 2007–2012. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014; 63 12. Hacker NF. Cervical cancer. In : Berek JS, Hecker NF, editors. Practical gynecologic oncology. 5rd ed. Philadelphia : Lippincott & Wilkins; 2010; p.342-88. 13. ACCP. Natural History of Cervical Cancer : Even Infrequent Screening of Older Women Saves Lives. Cervical Cancer Prevention Fact Sheet. 2003. 14. Huchko MJ. Sneden J. Zakaras JM. McCune KS. Sawaya G. Maloba M. Bukusi EA. Cohen CR. A Randomized Trial Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid to Visual Inspection with Lugol’s Iodine for Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV Infected Women PLOSONE DOI:10.1371/journal.pone. 0118568; 2015 15. Notoatmodjo S. Promosi kesehatan dan perilaku kesehatan. Jakarta : Rineka cipta; 2012. 16. Darnindro N, et all, Pengetahuan Sikap Perilaku Perempuan yang Sudah Menikah Mengenai Pap Smear dan Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan Di Rumah Susun Klender Jakarta 2006. Maj Kedokt Indon. 2007; 57(7). 17. Goldie S.J. et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical-Cancer Screening in Five Developing Countries. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2158-68 18. Maharsie dan Indarwati. Hubungan Pengetahuan Ibu tentang Kanker Serviks dengan Keikutsertaan Ibu Melakukan IVA Test di Kelurahan Jebres Surakarta. Jurnal Penelitian. 2012; 9(2). 19. Depkes RI-JNPK. Kanker Serviks di Indonesia, See and Treat. Jakarta : Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2007.
* Corresponding Author
https://doi.org/10.19106/JMedScie/0050032018012 
Abstract views : 1112
| 
views : 1534
