Agussalim Agussalim(1*), Ali Agus(2), Nafiatul Umami(3), I Gede Suparta Budisatria(4)

(1) Faculty of Animal Science Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Faculty of Animal Science Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Faculty of Animal Science Universitas Gadjah Mada
(4) Faculty of Animal Science Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author


The latitude will influence plant type that growth, water availability, soil nutrients, temperature, humidity, rainfall, and sunlight, so that  impact on the ability of plant for flowering. This research was aimed to determine the types of honeybees forages as the source of nectar, pollen and the both based on the latitude in Yogyakarta.  The Research has been conducted in District of Cangkringan and Turi Sleman and Patuk Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta. The research used methods directly survey to observe in plantation area, field, and forest. Identification of plant type for produce nectar and pollen was taken one or two samples, then check the availability of nectar and pollen. The data  of type of bee forage were analyzed by descriptive analysis. The results of research showed that the type of bee forage in Cangkringan with latitude of 500 – 900 and > 1000 m asl were 23 plants consisted of coconut, sugarcane, rice, sengon, chili, tomato, bean, banana, corn, cucumber, melinjo, mahogany, walnut, durian, sesbania grandiflora, cocoa, cherry, eggplant, sweet potato, cassava and acacia. The District of Turi with latitude of 500 – 900 and > 1000 m asl were 18 plants consisted of coconut, calliandra, rice, tomato, banana, corn, mahogany, rambutan, durian, mango, papaya, avocado, jackfruit, guava, melinjo, kapok, sweet potato and cocoa. The District of Patuk with latitude of  200 – 700 m asl were 28 plants consisted of cacao, rice, corn, cassava, peanut, soybean, chili, eggplant, melinjo, orange, guava, durian, avocado, mango, rambutan, starfruit, sapodilla, papaya, banana, jackfruit, breadfruit, leucaena, rosewood, acacia, mahogany, albizzia, sweet potato and coconut. The type of bee forage as the source of nectar and pollen in Yogyakarta is varied so is potential for the development beekeeping honeybees.



Lebah madu, pakan lebah, nektar dan polen

Full Text:



Abrol, D. P. 1990. Energetics of nectar production in some apple cultivars as a predictor of floral choice by honeybees. Trop. Ecol 31: 116-122.

Abrol, D. P. 1991. Insect pollination and crop production in Jammu and Kashmir. Curr. Sci. 65: 265-269.

Abrol, D. P. 1995. Energetics of nectar production in some almond cultivars as a predictor of floral choice by honeybees, A. cerana indica F. and A. mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad B. 57: 127-132.

Abrol, D. P. 2007a. Foraging behaviour of A. mellifera and A. cerana as determined by the energetics of nectar production in different cultivars of Brassica campestris var. toria. J. Apic. Sci. 51: 5-10.

Abrol, D. P. 2007b. Differences in sugar metabolism among honeybees, A. mellifera and A. cerana potentially impact floral attractiveness. J. Apic. Res. 46: 181-190.

Abrol, D. P. 2009. Bees and Beekeeping in India, 2nd edn. Kalyani, Ludhiana.

Abrol, D. P. 2010. Foraging behavior of Apis florea F. an important pollinator of Allium cepa L. J. Apic. Res. Bee World 49: 318-325.

Abrol, D. P. 2011. Foraging. In: Honeybees of Asia. R. Hepburn and Sarah E. Radolf (Eds). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 257-292.

Abrol, D. P. 2015. Pollination and fruit productivity. In: Pollination Biology Vol. 1 (Pests and pollinators of fruit crops). D. P. Abrol (Ed). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 1-24.

Adgaba, N., A. Al-Ghamdi, Y. Tadesse, A. Getachew, A. M. Awad, M. J. Ansari, A. A. Owayss, S. E. A. Mohammed and A. S. Alqarni. 2017. Nectar secretion dynamics and honey production potentials of some major honey plants in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 24: 180-191

Adler, L. S. 2000. The ecological significance of toxic nectar. Oikos 91: 409-420.

Agussalim. 2015. Produksi madu, polen dan propolis lebah Trigona sp. dalam berbagai desain stup. Tesis Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Arizmendi, M. C. 2001. Multiple ecological interactions: Nectar robbers and hummingbirds in a highland forest in Mexico. Can. J. Zool. 79: 997-1006.

BPS Gunungkidul. 2015. Kecamatan Patuk Dalam Angka. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta.

BPS Sleman. 2015. Kecamatan Turi dalam Angka. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Sleman, Yogyakarta.

BPS Sleman. 2016. Kecamatan Cangkringan Dalam Angka 2016. Badan Pusat Statistik, Sleman, Yogyakarta.

BPS. 2015. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Statistika Daerah. Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta.

Bumrungsri, S., E Sripaoraya, T. Chongsiri, K. Sridith and P. A. Racey. 2009. The pollination ecology of durian (Durio zibethinus, Bombacaceae) in southern Thailand. J. Trop. Ecol. 25: 85-92.

Carter, C. and R. W. Thornburg. 2004. Is the nectar redox cycle a floral defense against microbial attack?. Trends Plant Sci. 9: 320-324.

Chalcoff, V. R., M. A. Aizen and L. Galetto. 2006. Nectar concentration and composition of 26 species from the temperate forest of South America. Ann. Bot. 97: 413-421.

Corlett, R. T. 2011. Honeybees in natural ecosystems. In: Honeybees of Asia. R. Hepburn and Sarah E. Radolf (Eds). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 215-225.

Crane, E., P. Walker and R. Day. 1984. Directory of Important World Honey Sources. International Bee Research Association, London.

Cruden, R. W., S. M. Hermann and S. Peterson. 1983. Patterns of nectar production and plant animal coevolution. In: The biology of nectaries. B. Bentley and T. Elias (Eds.). Columbia University Press, New York. pp. 126-152.

Danner, N., S. Härtel and I. Steffan-Dewenter. 2014. Maize pollen foraging by honey bees in relation to crop area and landscape context. Basic and App. Ecol. 15: 677-684.

DPPD. 2012. Update Data Peruntukan Tanah Kabupaten Sleman Tahun Anggaran 2012. Dinas Pengendalian Pertanahan Daerah Kabupaten Sleman, Yogyakarta.

El-Kazafy, A. T. 2007. Importance of banana musa sp. (musaceae) for honey bee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Egypt. Bull. Ent. Soc. Egypt. 2: 125-133.

Erwan. 1999. Pengaruh jenis lebah (Apis cerana dan Apis mellifera) terhadap efisiensi pengumpulan nektar tanaman. Tesis Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Heinrich, B. 1979. Thermoregulation of African and European honeybees during foraging, attack, and hive exits and returns. J. Exp. Biol. 80: 217-229.

Hernández-Conrique, D., J. F. Ornelas, J. G. Garcĩa-Franco and C. F. Vargas. 2007. Nectar production of calliandra longipedicellata (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae), an Endemic Mexican Shrub with multiple potential pollinators. Biotrop. 39: 459-467.

Kovac, H. and S. Schmaranzer. 1996. Thermoregulation of honeybees (Apis mellifera) foraging in spring and summer at different plants. J. Insect Phy. 42: 1071-1076.

Kovac, H., A. Stabentheiner and S. Schmaranzer. 2010. Thermoregulation of water foraging honeybees – Balancing of endothermic activity with radiative heat gain and functional requirements. J. Insect Phy. 56: 1834-1845.

Krisnawati, H., M. Kallio and M. Kanninen. 2011. Swietenia macrophylla King.: ecology, silviculture and productivity. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor.

Linskens, H. F. and W. Jorde. 1997. Pollen as food and medicine. A review. Econ. Bot. 51: 78-87.

MacQueen, J. D. and H. M. Hernandez´. 1997. A revision of Calliandra series racemosae (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Kew. Bull. 52: 1-50.

Pacini, E. and S. W. Nicolson. 2007. Introduction. In: Nectaries and Nectar. Susan WN., M. Nepi and E. Pacini (Eds). Springer, New York. pp. 1 -18.

Paiva, E. A. S. 2012. Anatomy, ultrastructure, and secretory activity of the floral nectaries in Swietenia macrophylla (Meliaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 99: 1910-1917.

Partap, U. 2011. The pollination role of honeybees. In: Honeybees of Asia. R. Hepburn and Sarah E. Radolf (eds). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 227-255.

Pushpalatha, S. and Y. Hariprasad. 2015. Foraging behaviour of Indian honey bee (Apis cerena indica Fab.) in bee pasturaging plants at annamalainagar eco system. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res. 6: 6974-6976.

Raguso, R. A. 2004. Why some floral nectars scented?. Ecol. 85: 1486-1494.

Roldán-Serrano, A. S. and J. M. Guerra-Sanz. 2004. Dynamics and sugar composition of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum, L.) nectar. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 79: 717-722.

Roubik, D. W. 1991. Aspects of Africanized honey bee ecology in tropical America. In: The African Honey Bee. M. Spivak, D.J.C. Fletcher and M.D. Breed (Eds.). Westview Press. Boulder. pp. 259-281.

Rutikanga, A., G. Tusiime, G. Night, W. Ocimati and G. Blomme. 2016. Variation in nectar volume and sugar content in male flowers of Musa cultivars grown in Rwanda and their non-effect on the numbers of visiting key diurnal insect vectors of banana Xanthomonas wilt. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 11: 607-623.

Sihombing, D. T. H. 2005. Ilmu Ternak Lebah Madu. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Singaravelan, N. and G. Marimuthu. 2004. Nectar feeding and pollen carrying from Ceiba pentandra By pteropodid bats. J. Mammal. 85: 1-7.

Steel, R. G. D. dan J. H. Torrie. 1993. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika, Suatu Pendekatan Biometrik. Penerjemah : B. Sumantri. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Tautz, J. 2008. The buzz about bees : biology of a superorganism. Springer, New York.

Žilic´, S., J. Vancˇetovic´ and V. Maksimovic´. 2014. Chemical composition, bioactive compounds, antioxidant capacity and stability of floral maize (Zea mays L.) pollen. J. Funct. Foods 10: 65-74.



Article Metrics

Abstract views : 812 | views : 12145


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Buletin Peternakan (Bulletin of Animal Science) Indexed by:

 Harvard Library
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.