Income Analysis of Closed House Broiler Farm with Partnership Business Model

siswanto imam santoso; Teysar Adi Sarjana; Agus Setiadi

doi:10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i2.33222

Income Analysis of Closed House Broiler Farm with Partnership Business Model

https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i2.33222

siswanto imam santoso^(1*), Teysar Adi Sarjana⁽²⁾, Agus Setiadi⁽³⁾

(1) Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This research aims to determine the performance and income of a closed-house broiler farm with partnership business model. The research was conducted in a closed broiler house owned by Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang, and in a partnership with Cemerlang Unggas Lestari Ltd. A total of 11,000 broilers were raised for each raising period in the closed broiler house. A case study method was used for this research. The data were collected using survey method; the primary data were collected directly through interviews with the farm operators and field observation. Secondary data were collected through data recording which includes production cost and obtained revenue in each raising period. The collected data were then analyzed through quantitative-descriptive study. A total 7 raising periods of production cost, revenue, and income in a year were analyzed. The results of this study showed that the average performances of closed-house broiler farm yield 0.37% depletion, 1.49 FCR, and 398.46 PI. The economic indicators showed that the average production cost was Rp292,668,800.00; which generated Rp327,300,779.00 revenue, Rp34,631,978.00 income, Rp183.055.535.00 NPV, and 1.24 BCR. The study concluded that the closed-house broiler farm generates higher income compared with the open house system.

Keywords

Broiler; Close house; Income; Partnership; Revenue

Full Text:

PDF

References

Achmanu dan Muharlien. 2011. Ilmu Ternak Unggas. UB Press, Malang.

Amrizal, E. Rahmadani, and Elfawati. 2011. Analisis finansial usaha peternakan ayam broiler di Peternakan Karisa Kelurahan Simpang Baru Kecamatan Tampan Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Peternakan 8: 77-87.

Dharmawan, R., H. S. Prayogi, dan V. M. A. Nurgiartiningsih. 2017. Penampilan produksi ayam pedaging yang dipelihara pada lantai atas dan lantai bawah. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan 26: 27-37.

Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. 2017. Buku Statistik Peternakan 2017. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan Dan Kesehatan Hewan Kementerian Pertanian, Jakarta.

Husvetha, L. Pal, E. Galambb, K. C. Acs, L. Bustyahazai, L. Wagner, F. Dublecz, and K. Dublecz. 2015. Effects of whole wheat incorporated into pelleted diets on the growth performance and intestinal function of broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technology 210: 144–151.

Majid, R. and S. Hassan. 2013. Performance of broiler contract farmers: a case study in Perak, Malaysia. UMK Procedia 1: 18 – 25.

Majid, R. and S. Hassan. 2016. Economic impact of closed house system in broiler farm performance. Int. J. Current Research 8: 28756-28759.

Maliton, G., H. D. Utami, dan B. Hartono. 2015. Analisis kinerja finansial usaha peternakan broiler sistem closed house pola kemitraan di Kabupaten Tuban (Studi Kasus PT. Semesta Mitra Sejahtera). Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan 21: 10-15.

Prawira, I. G. I. K., I. G. Mahardika, dan I. W. Sukanata. 2017. Analisis pendapatan peternak ayam broiler dengan sistem pemeliharaan closed house pada pola kemitraan (studi kasus di peternakan plasma Sri Budi Ratini, Desa Candikusuma Kecamatan Melaya, Kabupaten Jembrana. Jurnal Peternakan Tropika 5: 238– 250.

Rasyaf, M. 2003. Beternak Ayam Pedaging. Edisi Revisi Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.

Rojano, F., P. E. Bournet, M. Hassouna, P. Robin, M. Kac, and C. Y. Choi. 2015. Modelling heat and mass transfer of a broiler house using computational fluid dynamics. Biosystem Engineering 136: 25-38.

Santoso, S. I., W. Sumekar, dan A. A. Wijaya. 2005. Analisis kinerja usaha peternakan ayam pedaging pola industri inti–plasma di bawah perseroan terbatas terbuka. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner 2005. pp.749-754.

Santoso, S. I. and A. Setiadi. 2016. Profitable utilization of Giant Salvinia, Salvinia molesta, as local duck feed. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 15: 121-125.

Soekartawi. 2003. Agribisnis Teori dan Aplikasi. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Sujana, Endang, S. Darana, dan I. Setiawan. 2011. Implementasi teknologi semi closed-house system pada performan ayam broiler di test farm sustainable livestock techno park, Kampus Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan Dan Veteriner 2011 pp.: 362-366.

Sun, Y. Y., S. Tanga, Y. Chenb, D. L. Lia, Y.L. Bic, D. K. Huaa, C. Chena, Q. Y. Luoa, L. Yang, and J. L. Chen. 2017. Effects of light regimen and nutrient density on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and health of slow-growing broiler chickens. Livestock Sci. 198: 201–208.

Saragih, F. D., A. H. Manurung, and J. Manurung 2005. Dasar-Dasar Keuangan Bisnis Teori dan Aplikasi. PT. Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.

Susanti, E. D., M. Dahlan, dan D. Wahyuning. 2017. Perbandingan produktivitas ayam broiler terhadap sistem kandang terbuka (open house) dan kandang tertutup (closed house) di UD. Sumber Makmur Kecamatan Sumberrejo Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan 25: 16-23.

Sutawi. 2007. Kapita Selekta Agribisnis Peternakan. UMM Press, Malang.

Trobos. 2018. Daya pikat kandang modern. Edisi online Januari 2018. http://www.trobos.com/detail-berita/2018/01/01/7/9703/daya-pikat-kandang-modern. Diakses tanggal 9 Februari 2018.

Wang, Y., Y. J. Ru, G. H. Liu, W. H. Chang, S. Zhang, H. J. Yan, A. J. Zheng, R. Y. Lou, Z. Y. Liu, and H. Y. Cai. 2015. Effects of different rearing systems on growth performance, nutrients digestibility, digestive organ weight, carcass traits, and energy utilization in male broiler chickens. Livestock Sci. 176: 135–140.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i2.33222