Evaluation of Compacted Forage Feed on Kupang Cattle Feeding Behavior


Fensa Eka Widjaya(1*), Despal Despal(2), Yuli Retnani(3), Rudy Priyanto(4), Luki Abdullah(5)

(1) Bogor Agricultural University
(2) Bogor Agricultural University
(3) Bogor Agricultural University
(4) Bogor Agricultural University
(5) Bogor Agricultural University
(*) Corresponding Author


Forage  compact  feed  has  the  ability  to  cut  the  adaptation  period  of  grazing cattle when transported, because they are used to consume forage. The effect of the form and  type  of  forage  formulation  on  the  feeding  behavior  of  cattle  needs  to  be  studied further to determine the preferences of cattle for this compact feed. This study used 36 cattle  with  3  replications  in  each  treatment.  The  2  factor  groups  withfactorial  design consisting  formulation  and  form  of  feed  was  applied  in  this  study.  The  forms  of  feed used in this study were wafers, pellets, dried pellets, and cubes. The formulations used in  this  study  were  formulation  1  (10%  molasses,  30%  indigofera  leaves,  50%  straw, 10% elephant grass); formulation 2 (10% molasses, 30% indigofera leaves, 60% straw); formulation  3  (10%  molasses,  20%  indigofera  leaves,  65%  straw,  5% hemp).  The parameters observed in this study were eating behavior of cattle which consisted of the frequency and duration of eating, drinking, rumination, and resting. The results showed that there wasan interaction on eating frequency and cattle duration. Formulation 3 on wafer  treatment  had  the  highest  feeding  frequency  (P<0.05).  Formulation  1  on  wafer treatment   had   the   highest   duration   of   rumination   (P<0.05).   In   the   conclusion, Formulation 1 and 3 with wafer shape showed the best behavior for eating.


Keywords: Feed logistics, Compacted feed, Feeding behavior, Kupang Cattle, Forage pellet

Full Text:



Abdullah, L. 2010. Herbage production and quality of shrub Indigofera treated by different concentration of foliar fertilizer. Med. Pet. 33(3): 169–175.

Aikman, P.C., C.K. Reynolds, and D.E. Beever. 2008. Diet digestibility, rate of passage, and eating and rumination behavior of Jersey and Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 91(3):1103–1114.

Arroquy, J.I., C.J. Lopez-Fernandez, A. Lopez. 2017. Use of cotton plant byproducts as a source of fiber in feedlot diets. Rev. de Investig. Agropecu. 44(1): 1-7.

Bae, D.H., J.G. Welch, and A.M. Smith. 1979. Forage intake and rumination by sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 49(5): 1292-1299.

Bae, D.H., J.G. Welch, and A.M. Smith. 1981. Efficiency of mastication in relation to hay intake by cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 52(6):1371-1375.

Beauchemin, K.A. 1991. Ingestion and mastication of feed by dairy cattle. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 7(2): 439-463.

Bowell, V.A., L.J. Rennie, G. Tierney, A.B. Lawrence, and M.J. Haskell. 2003. Relationships between building design, management system and dairy cow welfare. Anim.Welfare. 12(4): 547–552.

Chacon, E., T.H. Stobbs, and R.L. Sandland. 1976. Estimation of herbage consumption by grazing cattle using measurements of eating behaviour. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 31(2): 81-87.

Deswysen, A.G., W.C. Ellis, and K.R. Pond. 1987. Interrelationships among voluntary intake, eating and ruminating behavior and ruminal motility of heifers fed corn silage. J. Anim. Sci. 64(3): 835-841.

Freer, M., and R.C. Campling. 1965. Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. Br. J. Nutr. 1965(19): 195-207.

Freer, M., R.C. Campling, and C.C. Balch. 1962. Factors effecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. Br. J. Nutr. 1962(3): 279-295.

Grant, R.J., V.F. Colenbrander, and D.R. Mertens. 1990. Milk fat depression in dairy cows: role of particle size of alfalfa hay. J. Dairy Sci. 73(7):1823–1833.

Jayanegara, A., M. Ridla, E.B. Laconi and Nahrowi. 2019. Elephant grass, rice straw and maize silage as feeds: a dynamic modelling approach on their degradation kinetic. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 387.

Kennedy, E., M. McEvoy, J.P. Murphy, and M. O’Donovan. 2009. Effect of restricted access time to pasture on dairy cow milk production, grazing behavior, and dry matter intake. J. Dairy Sci. 92(1): 168-176.

Klinger, S.A., H.C. Block, and J.J. McKinnon. 2007. Nutrient digestibility, fecal output and eating behavior for different cattle background feeding strategies. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 87: 393-399.

Lindstroem, T., and I. Redbo. 2000. Effect of feeding duration and rumen fill on behavior in dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 70(2): 83-97.

Machado, M.G., E. Detmann, H.C. Mantovani, S.C.V. Filho, C.B.P. Bento, M.I. Marcondes, A.S. Assunção. 2016. Evaluation of the length of adaptation period for changeover and crossover nutritional experiments with cattle fed tropical forage-based diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 222(48): 132-148.

Maekawa, M., K.A. Beauchemin, and D.A. Christensen. 2002. Effect of concentrate level and feeding management on chewing activities, saliva production, and ruminal pH of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85(5): 1165–1175.

Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA). 2011. Final Report: Review of Fodder Quality and Quantity in the Livestock Export Trade, Meat and Livestock Australia Limited, North Sydney.

Meyer, R.M., E.E. Bartley, L. Morrill, and W.E. Stewart. 1964. Salivation in cattle. I. feed and animal factors affecting salivation and its relation to bloat. J. Dairy Sci. 47: 1339-1345.

Moore L.A., J.W. Thomas, and J.F. Sykes. 1961. A study of factors affecting the rate of intake of heifers fed silage. J. Dairy Sci. 44(8): 1471-1483.

Munksgaard, L., and H.B. Simonsen. 1996. Behavioral and pituitary adrenalaxis response of dairy cows to social isolation and deprivation of lying down. J. Anim. Sci. 74(4): 769–778.

Nasrollahi, S.M., M. Khorvash, G.R. Ghorbani, A. Teimouri-Yansari, A. Zali, and Q. Zebeli. 2012. Grain source and marginal changes in forage particle size modulate digestive processes and nutrient intake of dairy cows. Animal. 6(8): 1237–1245.

Norring, M., E. Manninen, A.M. dePassille, J. Rushen, L. Munksgaard, and H. Saloniemi. 2008. Effects of sand and straw bedding on the lying behavior, cleanliness, and hoof and hock injuries of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 91(2): 570–576.

O’Driscoll, K., B. O’Brien, D. Gleson, and L. Boyle. 2010. Milking frequency and nutritional level affect grazing behavior of dairy cows: a case study. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 122(2-4):77-83.

Plesch, G., N. Broerkens, S. Laister, C. Winckler, and U. Knierim. 2010. Realibility and feasibility of selected measures concerning resting behaviour for the on-farm welfare assessment in dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 126(1-2): 19-26.

Santini, F.J., A.R. Hardie, and N.A. Jorgensen. 1983. Proposed use of adjusted intake based on forage particle length for calculation of roughage indexes. J. Dairy Sci. 66(4): 811-820.

Schirmann, K., N. Chapinal, D.M. Weary, W. Heuwieser, M.A. von Keyserlingk. 2012. Rumination and its relationship to feeding and lying behavior in Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95(6): 3212–3217.

Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K., and T. Grandin. 2014. Cattle transport by road. In Grandin T (ed.) Livestock Handling and Transport; Wallingford (UK). 143–173p

Singh, S.S., W.R. Ward, J.W. Hughes, K. Lautenbach, and R.D. Murray. 1994. Behaviour of dairy cows in a straw yard in relation to lameness. Vet. Rec. 135(11): 251–253.

Suarez-Mena, F.X., G.I. Zanton, and A.J. Heinrichs. 2013 Effect of forage particle length on rumen fermentation, sorting and chewing activity of late-lactation and non-lactating dairy cows. Animal. 7(2): 272–278.

Swanson, J.C. and J. Morrow-Tesch. 2001. Cattle transport: historical, research, and future perspectives. Anim. Sci. J. 79: 102–109.

Thomas, M. and A.F.B.V.D. Poel. 2020. Fundamental factors in feed manufacturing: towards a unifying conditioning/pelleting framework. J. Ani Feed Sci. 268:114612.

Van Engen, N.K., and J.F. Coetzee. 2018. Effects of transportation on cattle health and production: a review. Anim. Health. 19(2): 1–13.

Wechsler, B., J. Schaub, K. Friedli, and R. Hauser. 2000. Behaviour and leg injuries in dairy cows kept in cubicle systems with straw bedding or soft lying mats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 69(3): 189–197.

Welch, J.G., and A.M. Smith. 1969. Effect of varying amounts of forage intake on rumination. J. Anim. Sci. 28(6): 827-830.

Wierenga, H.K. and H. Hopster. 1990. The significance of cubicles for the behaviour of dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 26(4): 309–337.

Yang, W.Z., and K.A. Beauchemin. 2006. Effects of physically effective fiber on chewing activity and ruminal pH of dairy cows fed diets based on barley silage. J. Dairy Sci. 89: 217–228.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v46i2.71461

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 729 | views : 482


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Buletin Peternakan (Bulletin of Animal Science) Indexed by:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.