Assessing the Predictive Power of Aptitude Tests on Academic Achievement of Students in Science and Technology Majors
Abstract
Keywords
DOI: 10.22146/gamajop.83491
References
Abdelfattah, F. A., Obeidat, O. S., Salahat, Y. A., BinBakr, M. B., & Al Sultan, A. A. (2021). The predictive validity of entrance scores and short-term performance for long-term success in engineering education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2021-0126
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press.
Anastasi, A. (1976). Psychological testing (4th ed.). Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/053331647600900215
Anggraini, N. P., Budiyono, & Pratiwi, H. (2019). Cognitive differences between male and female students in higher order thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012006
American Psychological Association. (2022). APA dictionary of psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/aptitude
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Psychological Assessment and Evaluation. (2020). APA guidelines for psychological assessment and evaluation. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-psychological-assessment-evaluation.pdf
Ardiyaning, L. (2012). Seleksi bakat untuk pengembangan potensi siswa berdasarkan Differential Aptitude Test (DAT) berbasis web. Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Asrijanty. (2014). Validitas prediktif bakat skolastik dan prestasi belajar sebagai kriteria seleksi masuk perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 515–534.
Azwar, S. (1996). Pengantar psikologi inteligensi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Azwar, S. (2016). Dasar-dasar psikometrika II.
Azwar, S. (2018). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Azwar, S., & Ancok, D. (2008). Validitas prediktif diferensial pada ujian tulis UM UGM. In Disertasi (pp. 45–67). Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Bennet, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1947). Differential Aptitude Tests for Personnel and Career Assessment: Technical Manual. The Psychological Corporation.
Bennet, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1952). Differential Aptitude Test: Manual (2nd ed.). The Psychological Corporation.
Bennet, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1948). By the authors.
Chauhan, S. S. (2009). Advanced educational psychology (7th ed.). Vikas Publishing House.
Corengia, A., Pita, M., Mesurado, B., & Centeno, A. (2013). Predicting academic performance and attrition in undergraduate students. Liberabit Revista de Psicologia, 19(1), 101–112.
Daulay, N. (2014). Implementasi tes psikologi dalam bidang pendidikan. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 21(2), 402–421.
Dodonova, Y. A., & Dodonov, Y. S. (2013). Faster on easy items, more accurate on difficult ones: Cognitive ability and performance on a task of varying difficulty. Intelligence, 41(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.10.003
Doppelt, J. E., & Bennett, G. K. (1951). A longitudinal study of the Differential Aptitude Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 11(2), 228–237.
Dorans, N. J., & Cook, L. L. (2016). Fairness in educational assessment. In Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–4). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_400
Downey, L. A., Lomas, J., Billings, C., Hansen, K., & Stough, C. (2014). Scholastic success: Fluid intelligence, personality, and emotional intelligence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 29(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573513505411
Dudung, A., Nurhidayat, D., & Yuliatmojo, P. (2019). The influence of engineering students' numerical reasoning on the academic achievement of Computer Numerical Control (CNC) course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(4), 044053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/4/044053
Erawati, M. (2015). Prestasi akademik siswa dalam kaitannya dengan motivasi akademik, persepsi terhadap dukungan akademik dan peran orang tua. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Fenster, A., Markus, K. A., Wiedemann, C. F., Brackett, M. A., & Fernandez, J. (2001). Selecting tomorrow’s forensic psychologists: A fresh look at some familiar predictors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971149
Flanagan, J. C. (1953a). FACT, interpreting test score. Science Research Associates.
Flanagan, J. C. (1953b). FACT examiner manual. Science Research Associates.
Freeman, F. S. (1976). Theory and practice of psychological testing (3rd ed.). Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.
Furr, R. M. (2022). Psychometrics: An introduction (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Soicher, R. N., & Becker-Blease, K. A. (2020). Four empirically based reasons not to administer time-limited tests. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000232
Goodheart, C. D., Levant, R. F., Barlow, D. H., Carter, J., Davidson, K. W., Hagglund, K. J., Hollon, S. D., Johnson, J. D., Leviton, L. C., Mahrer, A. R., Newman, F. L., Norcross, J. C., Silverman, D. K., Smedley, B. D., Wampold, B. E., Westen, D. I., Yates, B. T., Zane, N. W., Reed, G. M., & Bullock, M. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61(4), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271
Haciomeroglu, E. S. (2016). Object-spatial visualization and verbal cognitive styles, and their relation to cognitive abilities and mathematical performance. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 16(3), 987–1003. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.3.0429
Hertinjung, W. S., Sulandari, S., Utari, A. P., & Hastuti, F. D. (2020). Psychological potential identification of a private vocational high school students, Indonesia: Suitability of interests, aptitude, and selected majors. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 09(12), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.18533/jah.v9i12.2017
Hunsley, J., & Mash, E. J. (2007). Evidence-based assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091419
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.