Lysis Buffers for Detecting Pork Content in Food Products

https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.101620

Ulfah Lailatul Khoiriah(1), Pramudja Baydillah(2), Raden Darmawan(3), Nasori Nasori(4), Fadlilatul Taufany(5), Setiyo Gunawan(6*)

(1) Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
(2) Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
(3) Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
(4) Department of Physic, Faculty of Science and Data Analytics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
(5) Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
(6) Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia; Halal Study Center, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The increasing number of counterfeit processed food products with non-halal ingredients, such as pork, has caused public concern about the halalness of Indonesian food products, especially in the Muslim community. This issue has prompted the development of halal authentication techniques, including deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) isolation followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification to detect pork DNA. The main purpose of this research was to modify the lysis buffer using tris-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, cetyl trimethylammonium bromide, salt, alkaline, and urea. Two DNA extraction methods were evaluated using kit-based and conventional methods with modified lysis buffer. Using a fluorometer, it was proven that the conventional method with modified urea lysis buffer produced quite competitive DNA concentrations (119 ng for pork meat and 100.05 ng for pork sausage), as confirmed by real-time PCR analysis. As a result, the modified urea lysis buffer can be further developed because it is more affordable.

Keywords


DNA extraction; halal foods; halal testing; lysis buffer; real-time PCR

Full Text:

Full Text PDF


References

[1] BPS-Statistics Indonesia Samarinda Municipality, 2024, Religion in Indonesia, 2024, Samarinda, Indonesia.

[2] Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 33, 2014, Halal Product Guarantee, Jakarta, Indonesia.

[3] Fengou, L.C., Tsakanikas, P., and Nychas, G.J.E., 2021, Rapid detection of minced pork and chicken adulteration in fresh, stored and cooked ground meat, Food Control, 125, 108002.

[4] Mughal, D., Areeba, S., Ahmed, S., Ahmed, I., and Musharraf, S.G., 2025, Minimum limit of detection of pork fat DNA in halal food mixtures using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, JHASIB, 3 (1), 24–43.

[5] Du, J., Gan, M., Xie, Z., Zhou, C., Li, M., Wang, M., Dai, H., Huang, Z., Chen, L., Zhao, Y., Niu, L., Zhang, S., Guo, Z., Wang, J., Li, X., Shen, L., and Zhu, L., 2023, Current progress on meat food authenticity detection methods, Food Control, 152, 109842.

[6] Suryawan, G.Y., Suardana, I.W., and Wandia, I.N., 2020, Sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction in the detection of rat meat adulteration of beef meatballs in Indonesia, Vet. World, 13 (5), 905–908.

[7] Elsabagh, R., Abdeen, A., Morsy, M.K., Rayan, A.M., Abdelrahman, E.A., AbdElaaty, E.M., Ibrahim, S.F., Abdelkhalek, A., Șmuleac, L., Fericean, L., Elgazzar, A., El-Sayed, A.M., Habotta, O.A., Mahmoud, S.F., and Ibrahim, S.S., 2024, Possibility of using fatty acid profiles for the authentication of beef adulterated with pork, donkey, and dog meat, Ital. J. Food Sci., 36 (2), 48–60.

[8] Balakrishna, K., Sreerohini, S., and Parida, M., 2019, Ready-to-use single tube quadruplex PCR for differential identification of mutton, chicken, pork and beef in processed meat samples, Food Addit. Contam.: Part A, 36 (10), 1435-1444.

[9] Qin, P., Xu, J., Yao, L., Wu, Q., Yan, C., Lu, J., Yao, B., Liu, G., and Chen, W., 2021, Simultaneous and accurate visual identification of chicken, duck and pork components with the molecular amplification integrated lateral flow strip, Food Chem., 339, 127891.

[10] Karabasanavar, N., Girish, P.S., Kumar, D., and Singh, S.P., 2017, Detection of beef adulteration by mitochondrial D-loop based species-specific polymerase chain reaction, Int. J. Food Prop., 20 (Suppl. 2), 2264–2271.

[11] Song, Q., Chen, Y., Zhao, L., Ouyang, H., and Song, J., 2019, Monitoring of sausage products sold in Sichuan Province, China: A first comprehensive report on meat species’ authenticity determination, Sci. Rep., 9 (1), 19074.

[12] Chang, L., Huang, P., Liu, J., Fu, C., Liu, W., Gao, Y., Li, Y., Liu, Y., and Long, A., 2024, Real-time PCR method based on single-copy nuclear DNA sequences for the quantitative detection of pork adulteration in processed beef products, Food Control, 163, 110518.

[13] Hossain, M.A.M., Ali, M.E., Sultana, S., Asing, A., Bonny, S.Q., Kader, M.A., Rahman, M.A., 2017, Quantitative tetraplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay with TaqMan probes discriminates cattle, buffalo, and porcine materials in food chain, J. Agric. Food. Chem., 65 (19), 3975–3985.

[14] Singh Yadav, S., Tariq, R., Kumar Padhy, P., Saxena, A., Rai, P., Srivastava, V., Kumar, N., Kumar Sharma, S., and Priya, S., 2024, A multiplex DNA probe-based method for simultaneous identification of adulteration in meat samples, Food Chem.: Mol. Sci., 8, 100200.

[15] Pal, S., 2020, “Chapter 5 - Biomacromolecules” in Fundamentals of Molecular Structural Biology, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, US, 83–117.

[16] Corkill, G., and Rapley, R., 2008, “The Manipulation of Nucleic Acid” in Molecular Biomethods Handbook, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, US, 3-15.

[17] Silva, J.D.N., Viana, J.P.G., Costa, M.F., de Sá, G.H., da Costa Gomes, M.F., de Lima Feitoza, L., and Valente, S.E.S., 2021, A simple and cost-effective method for DNA extraction suitable for PCR in “Sucupira branca”, Biosci. J., 37, e37092.

[18] Cravero, D., Cerutti, F., Maniaci, M.G., Barzanti, P., Scaramagli, S., Riina, M.V., Ingravalle, F., Acutis, P.L., and Peletto, S., 2019, Evaluation of DNA isolation procedures from meat-based foods and development of a DNA quality score, LWT, 106, 64–71.

[19] Kadri, K., 2019, “Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR): Principle and Applications” in Synthetic Biology - New Interdisciplinary Science, Eds. Nagpal, M.L., Boldura, O.M., Balta, C., and Enany, S., IntechOpen, Rijeka, Croatia.

[20] Schoonbroodt, S., Ichanté, J.M., Boffé, S., Devos, N., Devaster, J.M., Taddei, L., Rondini, S., Arora, A.K., Pascal, T., and Malvaux, L., 2023, Real-time PCR has advantages over culture-based methods in identifying major airway bacterial pathogens in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Results from three clinical studies in Europe and North America, Front. Microbiol., 13, 1098133.

[21] Yalçınkaya, B., Yumbul, E., Mozioğlu, E., and Akgoz, M., 2017, Comparison of DNA extraction methods for meat analysis, Food Chem., 221, 1253–1257.

[22] Promega Corporation, 2020, Technical Manual Maxwell RSC Pure Food GMO and Authentication Kit: Instruction for Use of Product AS1600, Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, US.

[23] Isuwa, J., Abdullahi, M., Ali, Y.S., Hassan, I.H., Buba, J.R., Aliyu, I., Kim, J., and Oyelade, O.N., 2023, Optimizing microarray cancer gene selection using swarm intelligence: Recent developments and an exploratory study, Egypt. Inf. J., 24 (4), 100416.

[24] Shehadul Islam, M., Aryasomayajula, A., and Saelvaganapathy, P.R., 2017, A review on macroscale and microscale cell lysis methods, Micromachines, 8 (3), 83.

[25] Surzycki, S., 2000, Basic Techniques in Molecular Biology, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin.

[26] Switzer, R.L., and Garrity, L.F., 1999, Experimental Biochemistry, 3rd Ed., W.H. Freeman, New York, US.

[27] Afshar-Mohamdian, M., Rezadoost, M.H., and Fallah, S.F., 2018, Comparative analysis and innovation of a simple and rapid method for high-quality RNA and DNA extraction of kiwifruit, MethodsX, 5, 352–361.

[28] Lee, B.J., Kim, S., Lee, J.W., Lee, H.M., and Eo, S.H., 2021, Technical note: Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and proteinase-K improve the efficiency of DNA extraction from Japanese larch wood and PCR success rate, Forensic Sci. Int., 328, 111005.

[29] Rabilloud, T., 1998, Use of thiourea to increase the solubility of membrane proteins in two-dimensional electrophoresis, Electrophoresis, 19 (5), 758–760.

[30] Zhang, M., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Kang, C., Zhao, W., Ren, N., Guo, W., and Wang, S., 2022, Rapid LC-MS/MS method for the detection of seven animal species in meat products, Food Chem., 371, 131075.

[31] Heikrujam, J., Kishor, R., and Mazumder, P.B., 2020, “The Chemistry Behind Plant DNA Isolation Protocols” in Biochemical Analysis Tools - Methods for Bio-Molecules Studies, Eds. Boldura, O.M., Balta, C., and Awwad, N., IntechOpen, Rijeka, Croatia.

[32] Bennion, B.J., and Daggett, V., 2003, The molecular basis for the chemical denaturation of proteins by urea, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 100 (9), 5142–5147.

[33] Whale, A.S., von der Heide, E.K., Kohlenberg, M., Brinckmann, A., Baedker, S., Karalay, O., Fernandez-Gonzalez, A., Busby, E.J., Bustin, S.A., Hauser, H., Missel, A., O’Sullivan, D.M., Huggett, J.F., Pfaffl, M.W., and Nolan, T., 2022, Digital PCR can augment the interpretation of RT-qPCR Cq values for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, Methods, 201, 5–14.

[34] Giglioti, R., Polli, H., Tainá Azevedo, B., Morita Katiki, L., and Eugênio Vercesi Filho, A., 2022, Detection and quantification of adulteration in milk and dairy products: A novel and sensitive qPCR-based method, Food Chem.: Mol. Sci., 4, 100074.

[35] Che Man, Y.B., Aida, A.A., Raha, A.R., and Son, R., 2007, Identification of pork derivatives in food products by species-species polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for halal verification, Food Control, 18 (7), 885–889.

[36] Mohd Hafidz, M.M., Makatar, W.H., Adilan, H., and Nawawee, T., 2020, Detection of pork in processed meat products by species-specific PCR for halal verification: Food fraud cases in Hat Yai, Thailand, Food Res., 4 (S1), 244–249.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.101620

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 5670 | views : 2376


Copyright (c) 2025 Indonesian Journal of Chemistry

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 


Indonesian Journal of Chemistry (ISSN 1411-9420 /e-ISSN 2460-1578) - Chemistry Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.

Web
Analytics View The Statistics of Indones. J. Chem.