COMPARISON TEST OF FNAA AND AAS METHOD FOR Cu, Cd, Cr, AND Pb ANALYSIS OF CODE RIVER SEDIMENT (INDONESIA)

https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.21634

Sunardi Sunardi(1*), C. Supriyanto(2)

(1) Centre of Accelerator Technology and Material Process, National Nuclear Energy Agency, Jl. Babarsari P.O.Box 6101 Yk, Yogyakarta
(2) Centre of Accelerator Technology and Material Process, National Nuclear Energy Agency, Jl. Babarsari P.O.Box 6101 Yk, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Comparison test of Fast Neutron Activation Analysis (FNAA) and Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) method for analysis of Cu, Cd, Cr, Pb elements in Code river sediment samples has been done. Comparisons of test used Standard Reference materials (SRM) sample, covering the validation test, t test and F test for both method and then these methods were used to analyze the Code river sediment samples. Comparisons test result show that the validity of both method are around 92.69 % to 98.12 % and t test show that there is no significant difference in average concentration, F test of both methods show that there is no difference in accuracy. The analysis  result of Code sediment using FNAA for Cu, Cd, Cr, Pb are (15.41 - 53.92) ppm, (1.82 - 3.66) ppm, (14.72 - 87.28) ppm, (18.23 - 109.31) ppm respectively, while those using AAS method are (13.71 - 51.11) ppm, (1.64 - 3.33) ppm, (12.81 - 86.75) ppm, (15.74 - 105.53) ppm, respectively. Statistic result test using ANOVA method showed that the concentration of Cr are not significantly differences within sampling locations, while those for Cd, Cr, Pb show a significant difference within sampling location


Keywords


FNAA; AAS; Cu; Cd; Cr; Pb; sediment samples

Full Text:

Full Text Pdf


References

[1] Badan Standarisasi Nasional (BSN), 2000, Persyaratan Umum Kompetensi Laboratorium Pengujian dan Laboratorium Kalibrasi, SNI 19-17025-2000. Jakarta.

[2] Anonim, 2002, Pedoman KNAPPP 02-2002, tentang Persyaratan Umum Kompetensi Pranata Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Jakarta

[3] Hadi, A., 2000, Sistem Manajemen Mutu Laboratorium, Sesuai ISO/IEC 17025-2000, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta

[4] Nargolwalla, S.S., and Prsybylowicz, E.P., 1973, Activation Analysis with Neutron Generators, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

[5] Narsito, 1996, Prinsip Dasar dan Aplikasi Spektrometri Serapan Atom, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

[6] Palar, H., 2004, Pencemaran dan Toksikologi Logam Berat, PT. Rineka Cipta, ISBN. 979-518-595-0, Jakarta

[7] BAPEDALDA Yogyakarta, 2003, Prokasih Propinsi DIY, Badan Penanggulangan Dampak Lingkungan Derah Istimewa Yogyakarta.

[8] Anonim, 1996, Material Data Sheet, Reactor Experiments, Inc., 963 Terminal Way, San Carlos, California 94070

[9] Sumardi, 2001, Validasi Metode Analisis, Badan Standarisasi Nasional, BSN, Jakarta.

[10] Sukarjo, 1989, Analisis Varians dalam Bidang Kimia Analisis, BATAN, Yogyakarta.

[11] Buchman, M., 1999, Screening Quick Reference Tables NOAA, Seattle, Washington.

[12] Singgih, S., 2003, Mengolah Data Statistik Secara Profesional SPSS Versi 10, Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.21634

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1823 | views : 2374


Copyright (c) 2010 Indonesian Journal of Chemistry

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 

Indonesian Journal of Chemistry (ISSN 1411-9420 /e-ISSN 2460-1578) - Chemistry Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.

Web Analytics View The Statistics of Indones. J. Chem.