Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science) journal accepts papers online. Papers submitted must meet established criteria, have scientific excellence as well as providing a significant impact on the development in all fields of agricultural science. All the articles received will be reviewed by peer-reviewers.

Since December 2015, Open Journal Systems (OJS) has been applied for all processes in Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science). Therefore, the submitting authors are required to register in advance and upload the manuscript online. The editing process of the manuscript may be monitored through OJS. Authors, readers, editorial board, editors, and peer reviewers may obtain the real-time status of the manuscript. A hard copy of the journal may also be purchased through the system.  Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science) published three-times in a year, i.e. on April, August and December. Earlier changes of procedure may be found in the Journal History.

Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science) journal accepts original research articles, review articles, and short communications covering the following topics:

  1. Agricultural and Environmental Microbiology
  2. Agricultural Socioeconomics
  3. Agroclimatology and Agricultural phenology
  4. Agronomy
  5. Plant Biotechnology
  6. Plant Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics
  7. Plant Protection
  8. Plant Physiology
  9. Soil Science and Fertility
  10. Seed Science and Technology


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The article submitted to this online journal will be conducted initial review process by editorial board. Furthermore, if the article is considered feasible in substance, it will be sent to two peer-reviewers by Blind. After that, the article will be returned to the author for revise (no later than one month). Final decision of article acceptance determined by editor based on peer-reviewers assessment.


Publication Frequency

Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science) published three times a year in April, August, and December.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.


Publication Frequency

Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science) ISSN: 0126-4214 (print), ISSN: 2527-7162(online), is an open access journal published by Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada jointly with PISPI (Perhimpunan Sarjana Pertanian Indonesia).

Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science) published three times a year in April, August, and December.

Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science) is electronically published via journal website (http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jip)


Publication Ethics

The publication of articles is essential in the development of a comprehensive network of knowledge for a peer-reviewed journal. Therefore, it is important that each publishers, editors, authors, and reviewers should take the journal publishing process by themselves based on the highest level of professional ethics and standards.

The publisher’s dedication is to support the editor’s considerable efforts, author’s academic contribution and reviewer’s appreciated voluntary works. It is also the responsibility of a publisher to make sure that the publication system runs smoothly, and to support the editor, authors and reviewers in performing their ethical duties with the application of ethical guidelines.

The followings are lists of the editor’s responsibilities:

  1. The editor should  admit acknowledge receipt of submitted manuscripts within two working days of receipt and makes sure the review process is efficient, fair, and on time.
  2. The editor should ensure that confidential manner is treated to the submitted manuscripts with no disclosure of the content whatsoever other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and the publisher, as necessary.
  3. The editor should withdraw himself or herself from processing manuscripts when any conflict of interest exists between him or her and the authors or institutions in relation to the manuscripts
  4. The editor should make sure no disclosure of the names and details of the reviewers to a third party without the permission of the reviewers.
  5. The editor’s right includes the final decision on whether to accept or reject a manuscript in refer to the significance, originality, and clarity of the manuscript and its relevance to the journal.
  6. The editor should not oblige the authors to cite his or her journal as a condition for the manuscript to be accepted for publication.
  7. The editor is not allowed to use any part or any data or work reported in the submitted manuscript for his or her own research.
  8. The editor should give prompt response and take reasonable measures upon ethical complaint concerning a submitted manuscript or a published paper, and he or she should contact and consult with the author immediately, in which a written formal retraction or correction may also be required.

The followings are lists of the author’s responsibilities:

  1. The author should not submit coexisting manuscripts (or manuscripts with similar subject matter) to multiple journals. Also, he or she should not submit any paper that has already been published anywhere. However, when certain conditions are met, publication of articles on specific subject matter, such as clinical guidelines and translations, in more than one journal is acceptable.
  2. The author should present an accurate and brief report of his or her research with inseparable description of its significance.
  3. The author should gather and interpret his or her research data in an honest manner. Publishers, editors, reviewers, and readers are allowed to ask the author to provide the raw data for his or her research for the editorial review and public access conveniences. If necessary, the author should prepare such data for any possible use prior to publication.
  4. The author should guarantee the originality of her or his submitted work. The use or work and/or words by others should be provided with appropriate citations. Any forms of plagiarism is an unethical publishing behavior and highly intolerable.
  5. The author should provide explicit indication of any sources supporting the research as well as declaration of any conflict(s) of interest.
  6. The author should give acknowledgement to all of those who have made contributions to the research. Those with significant contributions to the research should be listed as coauthors who have affirmed the final version of the paper and agreed on its final publication.
  7. The author should give prompt information to the editor when there is any evident error(s) in his or her published paper, as well as earnest cooperation with the editor in the retraction or correction of the paper. When any party other than the author notifies the editor that the published paper contains an obvious error, a retraction or correction should be made by the author based on the medium of publication.

The followings are the lists of reviewer’s responsibilities:

  1. The reviewer should immediately notify the editor and excuse himself or herself from the reviewing process of the manuscript or when he or she feels unqualified to review the assigned manuscript, or affirms that he or she cannot meet the deadline for completion of the review.
  2. The reviewer should inform the editor and withdraw himself or herself from reviewing the manuscript if there is a conflict of interest. Specifically, he or she should withdraw himself or herself from reviewing any manuscript authored or coauthored by a person with an obvious personal or academic relationship with him or her, if the relationship may cause bias or the reasonable perception of bias.
  3. The reviewer should ensure that confidential manner is treated to the manuscript. It should not be disclosed to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  4. The reviewer should take objective approach upon the peer-review job. There should be no personal criticism to the author.
  5. The reviewer is not allowed to use any part or any data or work reported in the submitted manuscript for his or her own research.
  6. The reviewer should immediately inform the editor when recognizing any similarity between reviewed manuscript and another paper published or under consideration by another journal. The reviewer should give immediate call to the editor’s attention when the manuscript contains plagiarism or fabricated data.


Screening Plagiarism

To check the possibility of plagiarism manuscript is submitted using the application AiMOS 2.0