Pengaruh Peer Assessment dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Anamnesis di Skills Laboratory

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25159

Indah Puspasari Kiay Demak(1*), Amitya Kumara(2), Efrayim Suryadi(3)

(1) https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpki/editor/issueToc/2794
(2) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(3) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Peer assessment is a breakthrough innovation in assessment method where students assess their fellows. The benefits of it are feedback, cognitive and metacognitive gain, motivation, collaborative learning, self-regulated learning and performance enhancement. Learning in skills laboratory, students are expected to be able to master not only knowledge but also skills. Peer assessment is expected to make students be more motivate in learning and enhance performance. The aim of this study is to find out whether peer assessment can enhance students’ medical interview skills in skills laboratory.

Method: The method was a quasi-experiment study with matching-only pretest posttest control group design. The subjects were third-year students in Medical School of Tadulako University which were divided into 2 experiment groups and 2 control groups. Before giving treatment, the skills of students in all group were assessed (pre test). After the treatment, post test was held as an evaluation tool. The raising score from pre test to post test will be analyzed with student t test.

Results: P value for raising score was 0,907 (á > 0.05) with mean difference -0.091, which means statistically not significant. The negative number of mean difference indicate that the raising score in experiment group was lower than in control group.

Conclusion: Raising score in control group was higher than in experiment group, but not significance statistically. Application of peer assessment in skills laboratory should be more concern in students ability in assessing which can be obtain by intense training and continuous monitoring and feedback from instructor.

 


Keywords


Peer assessment, medical interview skills, skills laboratory

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Ormrod JE. Human learning, 4th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. 2004;425-38.
  2. Tim Pengembangan Kurikulum PSPD Untad. Kumpulan Data Program Studi Pendidikan Dokter Untad. Palu: Program Studi Pendidikan Dokter Untad; 2010.
  3. Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J. Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 1999; 24(4):413–27.
  4. Topping KJ. Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice. 2009; 48:20–7.
  5. Weyrich P, Celebi N, Schrauth M, Möltner A, Lammerding-Köppel M, Nikendei C. Peer-assisted versus faculty staff-led skills laboratory training: a randomised controlled trial. Medical Education. 2009;43:113–20.
  6. Hammond M, Collins R. Self-directed learning: critical practice. London: Kogan Page Limited. 1997;188-9.
  7. Liu N, Carless D. Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education. 2006;11(3):279-90.
  8. Topping K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research. 1998;68(3):249-276.
  9. Vu TT, Dall’ Alba G. Students’ experience of peer assessment in a professional course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2007;32(5):541–56.
  10. Kollar I, Fischer F. Peer assessment as collaborative learning: a cognitIve perspective. Learning and Instruction. 2010;20:344-8.
  11. Nofziger AC, Naumburg EH, Davis BJ, Mooney CJ, Epstein RM. Impact of peer assessment on the professional development of medical students: a qualitative study. Academic Medicine. 2010; 85:140–7.
  12. McLoughlin C, Luca J. An investigation of the motivational aspects of peer and self-assessment tasks to enhance teamwork outcomes. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 629-636.Perth,5-8 December. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/ mcloughlin.html
  13. Moreno JA, Gonzalez-Cutre D, Martin-Albo J, Cervello E. Motivation and performance in physical educaion: an experimental test. Journal of Sport Science and Medicine. 2010; 9:79-85.
  14. Perera J, Mohamadou G & Kaur S. The use of objective structured self-assessment and peer-feedback (OSSP) for learning communication skills: evaluation using a controlled trial. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2010;15:185–93.
  15. Schönrock-Adema J, Heijne-Penninga M, van Duijn MAJ, Geertsma J, Cohen-Schotanus J. Assessment of professional behaviour in undergraduate medical education: peer assessment enhances performance. Medical Education. 2007; 41:836–42.
  16. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP, Metesemakers JF. Reflection: a link between receivig and using assessment feedback. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2009;14:399-410.
  17. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. Feedback interventions: towards the understanding of double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1998;7(3): 67-91.
  18. Bond H, Spurritt D. Learning practical skills. In: Higgs J, Edwards H, editors. Educating Beginning Practitioners. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. 1999.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25159

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2577 | views : 2326

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Indah Puspasari Kiay Demak, Amitya Kumara, Efrayim Suryadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:

  

 JPKI Stats