Perbandingan Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Sebelum dan Sesudah Penerapan Badan Layanan Umum (BLU)

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25454

Betty Andiyarti(1*)

(1) Poltekkes Kemenkes Bengkulu
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: The performance-based system of Public Enterprise (BLU) demanding educational institutions is to provide service to the community as a provider of goods or services without seeking profits and in its implementation is based on the principle of efficiency and productivity. The performance of a public Enterprise already refers to the service of the public sector who apply principles (1) simplicity, (2) clarity, (3) certainty of timing, (4) accuracy, (5) security, (6) responsibilities, (7) the completeness of facilities and infrastructure, (8) ease of access, (9) comfortability, (10) discipline, courtesy, and hospitality. In educational institutions, academic performance in the field, laboratory and process of teaching and learning should be able to provide optimal service to students as users of services, in this study, the employee's performance will be discussed on the basis of 6 (six) criteria of employees’ performance indicators in terms of quality, quantity, timeliness, effectiveness, independence, commitment and work.

The purpose of the research: to see the performance of the employees of the Administration section of the Lab Manager, academic and lecturer at performance learning process in providing services to students as users of services in educational institutions.

Method: This research uses qualitative type of approach. In this research will provide information about two different situations, namely the experience of the past and experience at this time, so it can be known to the satisfaction of the students against the performance of the employee before and after implementation of Public Enterprise (BLU).

Results: Prior to the determine of the employee's performance in BLU provides services not yet optimal, officers have not provided accurate information to students, not working in accordance with the given service time, however after the determine of the employee's performance in BLU provides services to students and employees are already increasing duties in accordance with the auth respectively.

Conclusion: The implementation of public Enterprise (BLU) can improve the performance of employees in terms of service so that it can give satisfaction to the students as a user of services in educational institutions.


Keywords


Public service, performance, satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Keban. Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik ; Konsep, Teori, Isu, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Gaya Media; 2008.
  2. Leo C. Social Marketing Customer Orientation: A Conceptualization, Typology, and Conceptual Framework. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 2013;25(1):56–80. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10495142.2013.759818 [Accessed February 24, 2015].
  3. Creswell JW. Research Design ketiga. Qudsy.Z SAifuddin, ed., Yogyakarta: SAGE; 2009.
  4. Bernadin HJ, Rusell J. Human Resousce Management : An Experiential Approach Terjemahan. I. Grow-Hill, ed. Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman Presindo; 1993.
  5. Daryanto. Administrasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2010.
  6. Wahyuningsih T, Noviani L, Maret US. Kepuasan Mahasiswa FKIP UNS atas Kualitas Pelayanan Administrasi Akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 2013;1(1).
  7. Menteri Pemberdayaan Aparatur Negara. Permenpan No 03 Tahun 2010 Tentang Jabatan Fungsional Pranata Laboratorium Pendidikan dan Angka Kreditnya, Jakarta: Kementerian Pemberdayaan Aparatur Negara; 2010.
  8. Masri M, Fauziah I. Analisis Mutu Layanan Laboratorium. Jurnal Chemical, 2011;12:27–35.
  9. Mochamad E. Pengaruh Pembelajaran dan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan dan Loyalitas Mahasiswa. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2012;9:1-18.
  10. Kim M, Han S. Relationships between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Personality Profiling, Academic Performance and Student Satisfaction in Nursing Students. Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology, 2014;6(6):1-12.
  11. Siddiqui. Comparison of Services of Public, Private and Foreign Hospital from ThenPerspective of Bangladeshi Patiens. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 2007;2.
  12. Edris M. Pengaruh Pembelajaran dan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan dan Loyalitas Mahasiswa. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2012;9:1-18s
  13. Lo CC. How Student Satisfaction Factors Affect Perceived Learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2010;10(1):47-54.
  14. Hersey. Managing Human Resources. USA: Mc. Graw Hill; 2005.
  15. Sinuany Z. Operations Research in the Public Sector and Nonprofit Organizations; 2014, pp. 1-8.
  16. Winardi. Manajemen Perubahan. Jakarta: Kencana; 2004.
  17. Murray M. Innovation In The Public Services Management: Case of Slovakia. Journal of Public Procurement, 2015;15(3):317-40.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25454

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 204 | views : 870

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia; The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

JPKI Stats