Wiwik Kusumawati(1*), Titi Savitri Prihatiningsih(2), Gandes Retno Rahayu(3), Soenarto Sastrowijoto(4)

(1) Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta - INDONESIA
(2) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta - INDONESIA
(3) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta - INDONESIA
(4) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta - INDONESIA
(*) Corresponding Author


Background: Derogation of professional behavior (PB) increased in education, even in medical education revealed cheating during in educational process as best predictor when the students at work placed in the future. The aim of this study is to know the students’ perspective on cheating, altruism and plagiarism.

Method: This study was conducted using a qualitative approach. Sampling technique was purposeful sampling with criterion reference. Fifty-two year-one students of medical school of faculty of medicine and health sciences (FMHS) divided into 5 groups, each group consists of 10 to 11 students. The students received teaching learning of PB (three times tutorial with trigger film, reflection and expert panel). Qualitative data from students’ reflection analized using constant comparative method.

Results: The results of this study indicated the presence of 6 final themes (i.e., learning value, learning approach, student preparedness, examination strategy, learning spiritual, study plan. Students who had the ability to understand various learning events would have a good study plan, and then could choose appropriate examination strategy to reach success and could avoid blamable event such as cheating. The students who had good learning spiritual and learning value to dilemmatic event, they would be motivated and their heart would be touched, so in their future plan they would try to be altruistic and professional doctor in all situation. There would be influence on positive study plan, make more effort and pried to God, also respect others work, so plagiarism could be avoided.

Conclusion: There were 6 final themes of students’ reflection on cheating, altruism and plagiarism after they exposure by teaching learning of PB. They were learning value, learning approach, student preparedness, examination strategy, learning spiritual and study plan.





Professional Behavior, Qualitative, Cheating, Altruism, Plagiarism

Full Text:



1. Wagner P, Hendrich J, Moseley G, Hudson Vl. Defining Medical Professionalism: A Qualitative Study. Medical Education, 2007;41:288-94.

2. Hays R. Teaching and Learning in Clinical Settings. Radcliffe Publishing Ltd; 2006.

3.Luijk. Teaching and assessment of professional behavior; 2005.

4.Cohen R. Assessing Professional Behaviour and Medical Error. Medical Teacher, 2001;23(2):145-51.

5.Korszun A, Winterburn PJ, Sweetl H, Jones LT, Houston H. Assessment of Professional Afektif and Conduct in Medical Undergraduates. Medical Teacher, 2005;27(8):704-8.

6.Nonis S, Swift CO. An Examination of The Relationship Between Academic Dyshonesty and Workplace Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation. Journal of Education for Business. 2001;77(2):69-77.

7.Harper MG. High Tech Cheating. Nurse Education Today, 2006;26:672-9.
8.Kusumawati W. Profesionalisme dan professional behavior mahasiswa FKIK UMY. Mutiara Medika, 2011;11(1):37-45.

9.Erhamwilda. Mencermati Problem Pendidikan Indonesia Untuk Memperbaiki Kualitas Pendidikan (Suatu Upaya Meningkatkan SDM Bangsa). LKTI Dosen. Mimbar Unisba, 2004;20(4):1-24.

10. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods 3Ed. London: Sage publications, Inc; 2002.

11. Cresswell JW. Research design qualitative & quantitative approaches. London: Sage publications, Inc; 1994.

12. Goldie J, Dowie AT, Cotton P, Morrison J. Teaching professionalism in the early of a medical curriculum: a qualitative study. Medical Education, 2007;(41):610-7.

13. Savitri TP. Strategi Analisis Data Kualitatif untuk Penelitian Pendidikan Kedokteran dan Profesi Kesehatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran dan Profesi Kesehatan Indonesia, 2007;2(1):31-5.

14. Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitatif Data 4th Ed. London: Sage Publication Ltd; 2011.

15. KBBHI. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional; 2008.

16. Cameron C, Farver C, Zhao H, McHugh MK. Publication Ethics and the Emerging Scientific Workforce: Understanding “Plagiarism” in a Global Context. Academic Medicine, 2012;87(1):51-4.

17. Mayville KL. Technology, Cheating, Ethics and Strategies for Creating a Culture of Honesty. Journal of Illinois Nursing, 2011;109(3):6-10.

18. Ber R, Alroy G. Teaching Professionalism with The Aid of Trigger Films. Medical Teacher, 2002;24(5):528-31.

19. Lumlertgul N, Kijpaisalratana N, Pityaratstian N, Wangsataruka D. Cinemeducation: A pilot student project using movies to help students learn medical professionalism. Medical Teacher, 2009;31:e327-32.

20. Ketis ZK, Kersnik J. Using movies to teach professionalism to medical students. BMC Medical Education, 2011;11: 60.

21. Darbyshire D., Baker D. 2012. A Systematic review and thematic analysis of cinema in medical education. Med Humanit 38: 28 – 33.

22. Hejri SM, Wilkes M, Zendehdel K, Asghari F, Fotouhi A, Rashidian A. Academic disintegrity among medical students: a randomized response technique study. Medical Education, 2013;47:144-53.

23. Hughes JMC, McCabe DL. Understanding Academic Misconduct. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 2006;36(1):49-63.

24. Cabe DM. Cheating Why Students Do It and How We Can Help Them Stop; 2006.

25. Leontopoulou S. An Exploratory Study of Altruism in Greek Children: Relations with Empathy, Resilience and Classroom Climate. Psychology, 2010;(5):377-85.


Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2423 | views : 2855


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Wiwik Kusumawati, Titi Savitri Prihatiningsih, Gandes Retno Rahayu, Soenarto Sastrowijoto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by: