DEVELOPMENT OF ASYNCHRONOUS BLENDED LEARNING (ABLE) SKILLS LAB WITH PEER EVALUATION IN MIDWIFERY STUDENTS

Dita Eka Mardiani; Dedi Rachmadi; Deni Kurniadi Sunjaya; Ike R Husen

doi:10.22146/jpki.47423

DEVELOPMENT OF ASYNCHRONOUS BLENDED LEARNING (ABLE) SKILLS LAB WITH PEER EVALUATION IN MIDWIFERY STUDENTS

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.47423

Dita Eka Mardiani^(1*), Dedi Rachmadi⁽²⁾, Deni Kurniadi Sunjaya⁽³⁾, Ike R Husen⁽⁴⁾

(1) Program Studi Magister Kebidanan Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung - INDONESIA
(2) Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung - INDONESIA
(3) Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung - INDONESIA
(4) Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung - INDONESIA
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: Innovations in midwifery education is needed to strengthen students' skills. The Asynchronous Blended Learning (ABLE) Skills Lab model can improve student motivation, retention and skills, but the evaluation is still not optimal. One solution to overcome it by developing of the ABLE Skills Lab with Peer Evaluation model. This study aims to analyze the differences in the improvement of newborn resuscitation skills between the application of the ABLE Skills Lab model with Trainer Evaluation and Peer Evaluation.

Methods: This study used a quasy experimental two group pre-post test design. The participants involved in this research were 40 students of the fourth semester students of Diploma III Poltekkes Kemenkes Tasikmalaya who met the inclusion criteria. Subjects were divided into 4 learning groups that randomized into 2 research groups. Data were analyzed using inferential statistics and Rasch modelling. Results: There is no difference in the improvement of newborn resuscitation skills between the application of the ABLE Skills Lab with Trainer Evaluation model and ABLE Skills Lab with Peer Evaluation model (p=0,344).

Conclusion: ABLE Skills Lab with Peer Evaluation model has the same ability with Trainer Evaluation model in improving newborn resuscitation skills.ABLE Skills Lab with Peer Evaluation can be an alternative method when there are limited staff / instructors during the learning process without reducing the output produced.

Keywords: ABLE skills lab, neonatal resuscitation skills, peer evaluation, trainer evaluation

Keywords

ABLE skills lab, neonatal resuscitation skills, peer evaluation, trainer evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References

font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black'>

style='mso-spacerun:yes'> ADDIN EN.REFLIST

field-separator'>1. Rosita R, Hendarwan H, Despitasari M. Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan DIII Kebidanan di 5 Provinsi Wilayah Binaan GAVI. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pelayanan Kesehatan. 2017;1(2):120-30.

2. Indonesia MKR. Keputusan menteri kesehatan republik indonesia nomor 369/menkes/sk/iii/2007 tentang standar profesi bidan. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI. 2007.

3. Data Statistik Uji Kompetensi Bidan [database on the Internet]2018. Available from: http://ukbidan.ristekdikti.go.id/pages/statistik_lulus

4. Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J, Atkins DL, Chameides L, Goldsmith JP, et al. Part 11: neonatal resuscitation: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation. 2010;122(16_suppl_2):S516-S38.

5. Ashish K, Wrammert J, Nelin V, Clark RB, Ewald U, Peterson S, et al. Evaluation of Helping Babies Breathe Quality Improvement Cycle (HBB-QIC) on retention of neonatal resuscitation skills six months after training in Nepal. BMC pediatrics. 2017;17(1):103.

6. Adhiyatma AA. Pengaruh Asynchronous Blended Learning Skills Lab Terhadap Keterampilan Klinis dan Motivasi Mahasiswa: Universitas Padjadjaran; 2018.

7. Rahmi YL, Ardi A. Perspektif Mahasiswa Terhadap Peer Assessment dan Self Assessment pada Mata Kuliah Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. EKSAKTA. 2017;2:88-91.

8. Rhem J. Blended learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy.Stylus Publishing, LLC.;2012.

9. Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, Hu R, Li Y, Yan W. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of medical Internet research. 2016;18(1).

10. Barida M. Keterampilan Metakognisi Mahasiswa Program Studi Bimbingan Dan Konseling Terhadap Mata Kuliah Statistik. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling: Jurnal Kajian Psikologi Pendidikan dan Bimbingan Konseling. 2017:46-54.

11. Prasetya I. Telaah Teoretis Model Experiential Learning dalam Pelatihan Kewirausahaan Program Pendidikan Non Formal. Majalah Ilmiah Pembelajaran. 2011;7(2).

12. Sumintono B, Widhiarso W. Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan.Trim Komunikata;2015.

13. Darungan TS, Rahayu GR, Claramita M. Evaluasi Proses Pemberian Feedback di Tutorial Problem-Based Learning di Fakultas Kedokteran. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia; The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education. 2016;5(2):88-100.

14. SERUNI S, HIKMAH N. Pemberian Umpan Balik dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Minat Belajar Mahasiswa. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA. 2015;4(3).

15. Ozogul G, Sullivan H. Student performance and attitudes under formative evaluation by teacher, self and peer evaluators. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2009;57(3):393-410

16. Brookhart SM. Teacher feedback in formative classroom assessment. Leading student assessment. Springer; 2011. hlm. 225-39.

17. Lu J, Law N. Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science. 2012;40(2):257-75.

18. Sahin MG, Teker GT, Güler N. An Analysis of Peer Assessment through Many Facet Rasch Model. Journal of Education and Practice. 2016;7(32):172-81.

19. Hong WH, Vadivelu J, Daniel EGS, Sim JH. Thinking about thinking: changes in first-year medical students’ metacognition and its relation to performance. Medical education online. 2015;20(1):27561.

20. Mehrdad N, Bigdeli S, Ebrahimi H. A comparative study on self, peer and teacher evaluation to evaluate clinical skills of nursing students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;47:1847-52.

21. Kulkarni CE, Bernstein MS, Klemmer SR, editors. PeerStudio: rapid peer feedback emphasizes revision and improves performance. Proceedings of the second (2015) ACM conference on learning@ scale; 2015.

22. Kollar I, Fischer F. Peer assessment as collaborative learning : a cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction. 2010;20:159-74.

font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;color:black;

mso-ansi-language:IN;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'>

style='mso-element:field-end'>

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.47423