DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF A HEALTHY ROLE-MODEL IN MEDICAL SCHOOL

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.61301

Michael Andreas Leman(1*), Mora Claramita(2), Gandes Retno Rahayu(3)

(1) Universitas Sam Ratulangi
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: A medical teacher as a healthy role-model has a critical role in supporting health promotion effectiveness in medical school. However, an instrument to measure the characteristics of the medical teacher as a healthy role-models is unavailable. This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate these characteristics by analyzing a model from previous grounded theory.

Methods: A total of 442 medical teachers at the Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, were invited to participate. We used hierarchical component models (HCMs) to develop our path model. A partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) were then used to analyze this model.

Results: Twenty-six items from seven constructs supports our model. The construct of socially healthy (SH) has the most substantial effect on constructing healthy people's characteristics (H). The constructs of healthy role-models (HRM) in medical schools are mainly influenced by healthy people characteristic (H).

Conclusion: A questionnaire with 26 items grouped in these seven constructs showed good reliability and validity. Seven constructs have relevance to the characteristics of a healthy role-model in the medical school model.


Keywords


role-model, PLS-SEM, medical schools

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Asean University Network-Health Promotion Network. AUN healthy university framework. 2nd ed. 2017 Available from: http://www.aunsec.org/photo2019-1/2019-8-20-HUF.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2019.
  2. Dooris M. The "health promoting university": a critical exploration of theory and practice. Health Educ J. 2001; 101(2):51-60. doi: 10.1108/09654280110384108
  3. Leman MA, Claramita M, Rahayu GR. Defining a 'healthy role-model' for medical schools: learning components that count. JMDH 2020;13:1325-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S279574.
  4. Online Archieve of WMA Declaration Of Geneva. 2017 [Internet]. World Medical Association. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva/&pdfName=wma-declaration-of-geneva. Accessed March 27, 2019.
  5. McAleer S, Roff S. Educational environment. In: Dent JA, Harden RM, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. 4th ed. London: Elsevier; 2013; pp. 392-9.
  6. Paice E, Heard S, Moos F. How important are role-model in making good doctors? BMJ 2002;325:707-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7366.707.
  7. Kenny NP, Mann KV, MacLeod H. Role-modelling in physicians' professional formation: reconsidering an essential but untapped educational strategy. Acad Med, 2003;78(12):1203-10. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200312000-00002
  8. Stern DT, Papadakis M. The developing physician-becoming a professional. N Engl J Med, 2006;355:1794-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra054783.
  9. Cruess SR, Cruess RL, Steinert Y. Role-modelling-making the most of a powerful teaching strategy. BMJ 2008;336:718-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39503.757847.BE
  10. Kahn MW. Etiquette-based medicine. N Engl J Med, 2008;358(19):1988-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0801863.
  11. Ware JE. Standards for validating health measures: definition and content. J Chron Dis. 1987;40(6):473-80. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90003-8.
  12. Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gelhbach H. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE guide No. 87. Med Teach, 2014;36: 463-74. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.889814.
  13. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers. Psychol, 1975;28: 563-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.
  14. Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski KA. The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
  15. Karabenick SA, Woolley ME, Friedel JM, Ammon BV, Blazevski J, Bonney CR, De Groot E, Gilbert MC, Musu L, Kempler TM, Kelly KL. Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: Do they think what we mean? Educ Psychol, 2007;42(3):139–51. doi: 10.1080/00461520701416231
  16. Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
  17. Watt T, Rasmussen AK, Groenvold M, Bjorner JB, Watt SH, Bonnema SJ, Hegedus L, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Improving a newly developed patient-reported outcome for thyroid patients, using cognitive interviewing. Quality of Life Research. 2008;17:1009–17. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9364-z.
  18. Willis GB, Artino AR. What do our respondents think we’re asking? Using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(3):353–6. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00154.1.
  19. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Gudergan SP. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA; 2018.
  20. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 2 ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA; 2017a.
  21. Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Schlittgen R, Taylor CR. PLS path modeling and evolutionary segmentation. Journal of Business Research, 2013; 66: 1318–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.031
  22. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kupperlwieser VG. (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research", European Business Review, 2014;26(2):106-21. doi: 10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.
  23. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2011;19:139–51. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
  24. Hulland J. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 1999;20:195–204. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:23.0.CO;2-7.
  25. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2015;43:115–35.
  26. Becker JM, Klein K, Wetzels M. Formative hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Recommendations and guidelines. Long Range Planning, 2012;45: 359–94. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001.
  27. Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 2003;14:189–217. doi: 10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018.
  28. Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Straub DW. A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 2012;36: iii–xiv. doi: 10.2307/41410402.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.61301

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1374 | views : 1444

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Michael Andreas Leman, Mora Claramita, Gandes Retno Rahayu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:

  

 JPKI Stats