Yoga Pamungkas Susani(1*), Prattama Santoso Utomo(2), Nancy Margarita Rehatta(3)

(1) Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Mataram
(2) Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Keperawatan, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga
(*) Corresponding Author


Background: Scenario is one of the three main components of Problem-based Learning (PBL) besides students and tutors. Besides being an essential component in triggering interest in learning, scenarios also affect group dynamics and academic achievement. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most of the learning process was conducted online, including PBL tutorial discussions. Distraction during online PBL learning is a challenge that must be faced so that the discussion process can achieve the learning objectives. This condition requires the commitment of tutors and students and engaging scenarios that will also help students and tutors stay focused on the discussion. This article is a recommendation based on the IAMHPE Webinar #5 on the scenario development process to support the online PBL process. This article may provide a guide in developing PBL scenarios.

Recommendation: The development of PBL scenarios in pandemic conditions still needs to consider various aspects of preparing a good and immersive scenario. The steps needed are ensuring the scenario development team, determining learning objectives and tutorial issues, designing innovative scenarios, conducting reviews and improving the quality of scenarios regularly, and preparing informative tutor guides.

Conclusion: Scenarios for online PBL tutorials must support the application of the four PBL principles, namely constructive, contextual, self-directed learning, and collaborative learning. Each institution needs to create scenarios that are appropriate to its learning context.


scenario, problem, trigger, problem-based learning, online PBL tutorial.

Full Text:



1. Majoor GD, Schmidt HG, Moust JHC, Snellen HAM, Stalenhoef B. Construction of problems for problem-based learning. In: Nooman Z, Schmidt, H. G., Ezzat ES, editors. Innovation in medical education: An evaluation of its present status. New York: Springer; 1990. p. 114–22.

2. Gijselaers WH, Schmidt HG. Development and Evaluation of a Causal Model of Problem Based Learning. In: Nooman ZH, H. G.Schmidt HG, Ezzat ES, editors. Innovation in medical education: An evaluation of its present status. New York: Springer Publishing Co.; 1990. p. 95–113.

3. Van Berkel HJM, Schmidt HG. Motivation to commit oneself as a determinant of achievement in problem-based learning. High Educ. 2000;40:231–42.

4. Jonassen DH. Instructional Design Models for Well-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Learning Outcomes. ETR&D [Internet]. 1997;45(1):65–94. Available from:

5. Sockalingam N, Schmidt HG. Characteristics of Problems for Problem-Based Learning: The Students’ Perspective. Interdiscip J Probl Learn [Internet]. 2011;5(1):3–16. Available from:

6. Soppe M, Schmidt HG, Bruysten RJMP. Influence of problem familiarity on learning in a problem-based course. Instr Sci. 2005;33(3):271–81.

7. Jonassen DH, Hung W. All Problems are Not Equal: Implications for Problem-Based Learning. Interdiscip J Probl Learn. 2008;2(2):10–3.

8. Wittrock MC. Generative learning processes of the brain. Educ Psychol. 1992;27(4):531–41.

9. Azer S a., Peterson R, Guerrero APS, Edgren G. Twelve tips for constructing problem-based learning cases. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):361–7.

10. Roche M, Adiga IK, Nayak AG. PBL trigger design by medical students: An effective active learning strategy outside the classroom. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016;10(12):JC06–8.

11. Utomo PS, Shitarukmi S, Kurniawati N, Widyandana W. Comparing the Effectiveness of Led Tv/Lcd and Whiteboard As a Learning Media in Pbl Tutorial Discussion in a Medical School At Indonesia. J Pendidik Kedokt Indones. 2019;8(3):129.

12. Susani YP, Rahayu GR, Sanusi R, Prabandari YS, Mardiwiyoto H. Developing a Model of Professional Identity in Medical Students: the Role of Motivation and. J Pendidik Kedokt Indones. 2018;7(3):159–69.

13. Kenny NP, Beagan BL. The patient as text: A challenge for problem-based learning. Med Educ. 2004;38(10):1071–9.

14. Diemers AD, Dolmans DHJM, van Santen M, van Luijk SJ, Janssen-Noordman AMB, Scherpbier AJJA. Students’ perceptions of early patient encounters in a PBL curriculum: A first evaluation of the Maastricht experience. Med Teach. 2007;29(2–3):135–42.

15. Drummond D, Hadchouel A, Tesnière A. Serious games for health: three steps forwards. Adv Simul [Internet]. 2017;2(1):3. Available from:

16. Bizzocchi J, Schell R. Rich-narrative case study for online PBL in medical education. Acad Med. 2009;84(10):1412–8.

17. Dadgostarnia M, Gholami R, Ashoorion V, Esmaeili A, Shams B, Taban H, et al. Multistage problem-based case discussion for medical students. J Med Educ. 2003;4(1):17–22.

18. Munshi FM, Zayat ES a. El, Dolmans DH. Development and Utility of a Questionnaire to Evaluate the Quality of PBL Problems. South East Asian J Med Educ. 2008;2(2):32–40.

19. Shitarukmi S, Projosasmito SR, Roebertsen H, Science L. The Effectiveness of PBL Problems from Students and Tutors Perspectives. J Pendidik Kedokt Indones. 2017;6(1):31–43.

20. Mewo YM, Manoppo FP, Wungouw HIS. Evaluasi kualitas skenario Problem-Based Learning di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sam Ratulangi. J e-Biomedik. 2018;6(2).


Article Metrics

Abstract views : 883 | views : 971


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Yoga Pamungkas Susani, Prattama Santoso Utomo, Nancy Margarita Rehatta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by: