Psikologi Peluang Kewirausahaan: Proses Kognitif Pengusaha Startup Digital dalam Opportunity Recognition

Sadida Fatin Aruni, Rahmat Hidayat
(Submitted 9 April 2018)
(Published 10 April 2019)


Developed countries have at least 2% of entrepreneurs from the total population of the country. However, Indonesia has a very low number of entrepreneurs as well as an increasing unemployment rate over the years. Recently, the development of entrepreneurship in Indonesia dominated by the growing number of digital startup. Moreover, Indonesia is a country with the largest number of a digital startup in Southeast Asia. Initial psychological studies on entrepreneurship are focused on the personal characteristics of the entrepreneurs. However, conclusions from more than 30 years of research indicate that there are no special personality characteristics of entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs. In essence, the heart of entrepreneurship lies in the ability to recognize an opportunity. Opportunity recognition is a mechanism that happens in an individual’s cognitive process. Therefore, this study intended to reveal the cognitive processes that take place when entrepreneurs, in particular, the founders of digital startups, in the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities. This research uses the think-aloud protocol method with protocol analysis. Based on this research, we found that in the process of opportunity recognition, entrepreneurs focus their cognitive efforts on the market (demand) and technology (supply) as well as build relationships and meaningful patterns in these two aspects through structural relationship processing. This study provides an in-depth description of the cognitive processes that occur when entrepreneurs recognize entrepreneurial opportunities through structural alignment processes.


cognitive process; digital startup; entrepreneurship; opportunity recognition

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.34608


Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (2005). Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction. New York: Springer Science+Bussines Media, Inc.

Amalia, E. I. (2016, Juni 12). Di Asia Tenggara, Indonesia punya startup paling banyak. Dipetik Oktober 25, 2016, dari

Baron, R. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms entreprenuership: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 275- 294.

Baron, R. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic ‘‘why’’ questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221-239.

Baron, R. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entre­preneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business oportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 104 - 119. doi: 10.5465/amp.2006.19873412

Buchari, A. (2009). Manajemen pemasaran dan pemasaran jasa. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Busenitz, L., & Barney, J. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9-30.

Dahl, D. W., & Moreau, C. P. (2002). The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal Marketing Res, 39(1), 47-60. doi: 10. 1509/ jmkr.

Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepre­neurship. New York: Harper & Row.

Dunbar, K. (1993). Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 17(3), 397-434. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1703_3

Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2), 95-111.

Gartner, W. (1989). "Who is an Entrepreneur?" is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(1), 47-66.

Geldhof, G., Malin, H., Johnson, S., Porter, T., Bronk, K., Weiner, M., . . . Damon, W. (2014). Entrepreneurship In young adults: Initial findings from the young entreprenuers study. Journal of Development Psychology, 35(5), 410 - 421. doi: 10. 1016/j.appdev.2014.07.003

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170.

Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou, & A. Ortony, Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 199-241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., & Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Pscyhology, 25(4), 524-575.

Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., Markman, A. B., & Kotovsky, L. (1995). Two forces in the development of relational similarity. In T. J. Simon, & G. S. Halford, Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 263-313). Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

George, N., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2016). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: Insights on influencing factors. International Entreprenurship Management Journal, 309 - 350. doi: 10.1007/s11365-014-0347-y

Gregoire, D., Barr, P., & Shepherd, D. (2010). Cognitive processes of opppor­tunity recognition: The role of struc­tural alignment. Organization Science, 21(2), 413 - 431. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0462

Hahn, U., & Chater, N. (1997). Concepts and similarity. In K. Lamberts, & D. Shanks, Knowledge, concepts, and categories (pp. 43-92). Cambridge: MIT: Press.

Hayes, N. (2000). Doing psychological research. Buckingham: Open Univer­sity Press.

Holland, J., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Bradford: MIT Press Cambridge.

Holyoak, K. J. (1985). The pragmatics of analogical transfer. In G. H. Bower, The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 59-87). New York: Academic Press.

Khilstrom, R., & Laffont, J. (1979). A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Politic and Economy, 87(4), 719-748. (2016, Juni 17). Kominfo luncurkan gerakan nasional 1000 startup digital. Dipetik Oktober 26, 2016, dari

Krueger, N. (2003). The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship. In Z. Acs, & D. Audretsch, Handbook of entreprenurship research (pp. 105 - 140). Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Matlin, M. W. (2008). Cognition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Pradana, R. S. (2013, Februari 04). Wirausaha: Indonesia butuh 4,8 juta pengusaha pemula. Dipetik Oktober 2016, 2016, dari

Ryza, P. (2016, September 30). Peran aktif pemerintah Indonesia dukung industri startup dan ekonomi digital. Retrieved Oktober 25, 2016, from

Sawitri, A. A. (2016, Mei 04). BPS: Pengangguran terbuka di Indonesia capai 7,02 juta orang. Dipetik Oktober 25, 2016, dari

Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportu­nities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448 -469.

Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-oppor­tunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Shaver, K., & Scott, L. (1991). Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2(2), 23 - 45. doi: 10.1177/ 104225879201600204

Someran, M. W., Barnard, Y., & Sandberg, J. A. (1994). The think aloud method : A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.

U.S Small Business Administration. (2016). Startups & high growth businesses. Diunduh Oktober 26, 2016, dari Small Bussines Administration:

Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 3(1), 119 - 138.

Vosniadou, S. A., & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ward, T. B. (1995). What’s old about new ideas? In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & A. Finke, The creative cognition approach (pp. 157-178). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Whittlesea, B. (1997). The representation of general and particular knowledge. In K. Lamberts, Knowledge, concepts and categories (pp. 211-264). Cambridge: MIT Press.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Psikologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.