Email this article 
Validasi Struktur Internal Alat Ukur Refleksi Diri Adaptif melalui CFA
https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.34966 Siti Bahiyah(1), setiawati intan savitri(2*)
(1) Universitas Mercu Buana
(2) Universitas Mercu Buana
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Adaptive self-reflection could be done if people could react positively when analyzing negative experienced by reflecting emotions, allowing the self to reconstruct the feelings and meaning of the experience rather than recounting what has happened and what is perceived or avoiding it (self-distancing). The purpose of this study is to developed adaptive self-reflection questionnaire by validating internal structure some of the scales that have the same relation with adaptive self-reflection construct. This study used a quantitative approach with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) method involving 100 respondents in the trial and 306 respondents in the next test. The Adaptive self-reflection questionnaire that produced in this study consisted of 15 items that measure three dimensions, namely the emotional reactivity, thought content, and avoidance. The Adaptive self-reflection questionnaire proved to be valid and reliable (CR = 0.80). The test results proved that measuring adaptive self-reflection questionnaire meet the unidimensionality assumption.
Abstrak : Seseorang mencapai refleksi diri adaptif apabila dapat bereaksi secara positif ketika mengingat peristiwa negatif yang pernah dialaminya dengan melakukan refleksi diri, membiarkan diri merekonstruksi perasaan dan makna dari pengalaman daripada mengulang apa yang telah terjadi dan apa yang dirasakan secara nyata atau melakukan penghindaran (self-distancing). Tujuan penelitian ini merancang alat ukur refleksi diri adaptif dengan cara memvalidasi struktur internal beberapa alat ukur sejenis yang berkaitan dengan refleksi diri dengan menggunakan metode Confirmatory Faktor Analysis (CFA) yang melibatkan 100 responden pada tahap uji coba dan 306 responden pada pengujian berikutnya. Alat ukur refleksi diri adaptif yang dihasilkan dari penelitian ini terdiri dari 15 aitem yang mengukur tiga dimensi yaitu reaksi emosi, konten pikiran dan penghindaran. Alat ukur refleksi diri adaptif terbukti valid dan reliable (CR = 0.80). Hasil pengujian membuktikan bahwa alat ukur refleksi diri adaptif ini memenuhi asumsi unidimensionalitas.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ayduk, Ö., & Kross, E. (2010). Analyzing negative experiences without ruminating: The role of self-distancing in enabling adaptive self-reflection. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 841–854. doi: 10.1111/ j.1751-9004.2010.00301.x
Eisma, M. C., & Stroebe, M. S. (2017). Rumination following bereavement: An overview. Bereavement Care, 36(2), 58–64. doi: 10.1080/02682621.2017. 1349291
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness. Assessment and Theory, 43(4), 522–527.
Gerace, A., Day, A., Casey, S., & Mohr, P. (2017). “I think, you think”: Understanding the importance of self-reflection to the taking of another person’s perspective. Journal of Relationships Research, 8(9), doi: 10.1017/jrr.2017.8
Ghozali, I., & Fuad. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Teori, konsep, dan aplikasi dengan program LISREL 8.80 Edisi III. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro
Gillespie, A. (2007) The social basis of self-reflection. In: Valsiner, Jaan and Rosa, Alberto, (eds.). The cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology (ed., pp. 678-691). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Grant, A. M., Franklin, J., & Langford, P. (2002). The self-reflection and insight scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 30(8), 821–835. doi: 10.2224/ sbp.2002. 30.8.821
Kolubinski, D. C., Nikčević, A. V., Lawrence, J. A., & Spada, M. M. (2017). The metacognitions about self-critical rumination questionnaire. Journal of Affective Disorders, 220, 129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.002
Kross, E., & Ayduk, O (2017). Self distancing theory: Theory, research, and current direction. Article In Press
Kross, E., & Ayduk, Ö. (2008). Facilitating adaptive emotional analysis: Distinguishing distanced-analysis of depressive experiences from immersed-analysis and distraction. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 34(7), 924-938. doi: 10.1177/ 0146167208315938
Kross, E., Duckworth, A., Ayduk, O., Tsukayama, E., & Mischel, W. (2011). The effect of self-distancing on adaptive versus maladaptive self-reflection in children. Emotion, 11(5), 1032–1039. doi: 10.1037/a0021787
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking- rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400–424.
Ramos-Cejudo, J., Salguero, J. M., Kannis-Dymand, L., García-Sancho, E., & Love, S. (2017). Anger rumination in Australia and Spain: Validation of the Anger Rumination Scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 69(4), 293–302. doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12154
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Sobur, A. (2003). Psikologi umum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Trapnell, P. D., & Campbell, J. D. (1999). Private self counsciousness and the five factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 284–304.
Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Hoeksema, S, N. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(3), 247–259. doi: 10.1023/A:1023910315561
Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (2007). Psikologi edisi kesembilan. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga
Widhiarso, W. (2016). Peranan butir unfavorabel dalam menghasilkan dimensi baru dalam pengukuran psikologi, diunduh dari http://www. widhiarso.staff.ugm.ac.id.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.34966
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 9398
| 
views : 28922
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Psikologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Recent Issues
 | | | | ||||
| Vol 51 Issue 1 (2024) Page 219-332 | Vol 50 Issue 3 (2023) Page 219-332 | Vol 51 Issue 1 (2023) Page 125-218 | Vol 51 Issue 1 (2023) Page 1-124 |
| Published by Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia Building D-6th, Floor No. D-606. Jl. Sosio Humaniora No. 1, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta, 55281 Email: jurnalpsikologi@ugm.ac.id Phone/whatsApp: +6281125210175 |
