The Development of Cross-Sector Interorganizational Exchange Relationship Scale

Cicilia Larasati Rembulan; Avin Fadilla Helmi; Tri Rejeki Andayani

doi:10.22146/jpsi.99510

The Development of Cross-Sector Interorganizational Exchange Relationship Scale

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.99510

Cicilia Larasati Rembulan^(1*), Avin Fadilla Helmi⁽²⁾, Tri Rejeki Andayani⁽³⁾

(1) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Ciputra, Surabaya, Indonesia 🇮🇩
(2) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 🇮🇩
(3) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Solo, Indonesia 🇮🇩
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Cross-sector interorganizational exchanges are essential to meeting the needs of all parties involved. However, existing scales to evaluate such exchanges are scarce and are predominantly developed in Western contexts, which differ from Asia’s collectivist nature. This study developed a scale to assess interorganizational exchange relationships. Study 1 employed Straussian grounded theory with participants representing state-owned enterprises and community groups, using interviews and focus group discussions. Data were analysed using the Corbin and Strauss method, and the findings informed the item development for Study 2. Validity evidence based on the test construct was examined using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) with 20 participants, and item discrimination indices were calculated. Subsequently, data from 178 respondents were analysed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The CFA results indicated that a unidimensional 27-item model provided the best fit, differing from the five dimensions identified in the qualitative study. Nonetheless, no relationship-related items were removed, highlighting the central role of relationships in interorganizational exchange within a collectivist society such as Indonesia.

Keywords

cost; cross-sector collaboration; interorganizational relationship; reciprocal exchange; social exchange

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmad, A. R., & Yusof, M. M. (2019). Quranic cognitive behavioral therapy (Q-CBT): A faith-based model for treating depression. Journal of Religion and Health, 58(2), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0710-4

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Akbar, M. (2021). Islamic-CBT for Muslim clients: A culturally competent approach. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 15(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.3998/jmmh.10381607.0015.102

Al-Karam, C. Y. (2018). Religious and spiritual variables in psychotherapy research. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 5(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/scp0000140

APA. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.

Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press.

Beck, J. S., & Dozois, D. J. A. (2020). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cuijpers, P., Karyotaki, E., Reijnders, M., & Purgato, M. (2020). Meta-analyses and mega-analyses of the effectiveness of digital health interventions for mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 146(11), 964–992. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000298

Fitriyana, D., & Merida, N. (2023). Islamic cognitive restructuring for depressive symptoms: A Jakarta-based case study. Indonesian Journal of Psychology and Religion, 7(1), 44–59.

Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1

Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2019). The future of intervention science: Process-based therapy. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618772296

Hodge, D. R., & Nadir, A. (2008). Moving toward culturally competent practice with Muslims: Modifying cognitive therapy. Social Work, 53(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/53.1.31

Kazdin, A. E. (2017). Research design in clinical psychology (5th ed.). Pearson.

Novembrina, W., Hidayat, M., & Zahra, S. (2021). Quranic-CBT and pharmacological treatment among outpatients: A pilot study [Terapi perilaku kognitif Qur’ani dan pengobatan farmakologis pada pasien rawat jalan: Sebuah studi awal]. Jurnal Psikologi Islam Indonesia, 5(2), 100–115.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Stanford, M. S., McAlister, E., & Brown, T. (2023). Integrating spirituality into psychiatric practice: New directions. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 157, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.10.009

Weatherhead, S., & Daiches, A. (2010). Muslim views on mental health and psychotherapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 83(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608309X467807

WHO. (2021). Depression. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression

Zainal, K., & Kassim, S. (2020). Integrating Islamic values in cognitive behavioral therapy: A qualitative study. Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry, 29(1), 15–25.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.99510