Exoskeleton Intervention in Car Assembly Line to Minimize the Potential of Musculoskeletal Disorder Risk

https://doi.org/10.22146/juliet.v7i1.113187

Saskara B'tari Chedana(1), Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira Redi(2), Panji Nursetia Darma(3*)

(1) Sampoerna University
(2) Sampoerna University
(3) Sampoerna University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) remain one of the most prevalent occupational health issues worldwide, commonly caused by repetitive motions, awkward postures, and excessive physical load. In Indonesia, more than 40% of workers from various industries report MSD symptoms. Although ergonomic control measures aligned with international standards (e.g. ISO) have been implemented, these strategies are often insufficient to ensure safer postures sustained during work activities. Exoskeletons have been developed as a promising supplemental ergonomic intervention through its biomechanical mechanisms. This study examined the effectiveness of a passive shoulder-support exoskeleton adoption in one of the car assembly activities. Ten young adults performed repetitive bolt-tightening under two conditions: with and without exoskeleton assistance. MSD symptoms were assessed using the Borg CR-10 exertion scale, while postural risk was evaluated using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Additionally, task completion and recovery times were recorded to evaluate task efficiency. Subjective perception regarding acceptability and safety perception towards the device were assessed through a questionnaire. Based on the experimental results, the exoskeleton reduced perceived muscle exertion mainly in the wrist region and reduced task completion time by 13.6%. A notable reduction in post-task recovery time (19.08%) was also observed under the exoskeleton condition. The overall RULA score decreased from 7 (high risk) to 5.5 (medium risk), indicating a reduction in ergonomic risk. Furthermore, questionnaire responses revealed positive perceptions related to task speed and mobility support, although some usability challenges were noted. Overall, these findings suggest that passive shoulder-support exoskeletons have the potential to enhance worker safety, comfort, and task efficiency in repetitive elevated automotive assembly tasks.

Full Text:

PDF


References

J. de Kok et al., ‘Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: prevalence, costs and demographics in the EU’, 2019. Accessed: Aug. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://osha.europa.eu/es/publications/msds-facts-and-figures-overview-prevalence-costs-and-demographics-msds-europe

Z. S. J. Hosseini, H. R. Mokhtarinia, M. Vahedi, and M. Melloh, ‘Prevalence and multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders among automotive assembly workers: a cross-sectional study’, BMC Public Health, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 2710, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23987-4.

Suherdin, N. A. Rohendi, and Y. L. D. Y. Sinaga, ‘Risk Factors of MSDs Among Production Workers in Bandung’, International Journal of Health & Medical Research, vol. 02, no. 11, pp. 453–459, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.58806/ijhmr.2023.v2i11n07.

F. Z. Maznah, “Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders Associated with 3 Types of Work in Indonesia,” Ranah Res. J. Multidiscip. Res. Dev., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 2170–2178, 2025.

L. Hanifah, B. Widjasena, and I. Wahyuni, ‘Analisis Tingkat Keluhan Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) pada Pekerja Pabrik Roti di Jakarta’, MEDIA KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT INDONESIA, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 189–197, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.14710/mkmi.22.3.189-197.

H. F. Fajri and R. Modjo, ‘Analisis Hubungan Faktor Fisik dan Individu terhadap Prevalensi keluhan Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSDs) pada Pekerja CV Bengkel Otomotif Tahun 2022’, National Journal of Occupational Health and Saefty, vol. 4, pp. 39–56, 2023, doi: 10.59230/njohs.v4i1.7094.

S. Caroly, F. Coutarel, A. Landry, and I. Mary-Cheray, ‘Sustainable MSD prevention: Management for continuous improvement between prevention and production. Ergonomic intervention in two assembly line companies’, Appl Ergon, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 591–599, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.016.

I. Aslan, ‘Exploring the Appropriate Ergonomic Risk Assessment Method’, in ICHEAS 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH, ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388059179

X. Jin et al., ‘Ergonomic interventions to improve musculoskeletal disorders among vehicle assembly workers: a one-year longitudinal study’, BMC Public Health, vol. 25, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21798-1.

A. Otto and O. Battaïa, ‘Reducing physical ergonomic risks at assembly lines by line balancing and job rotation: A survey’, Comput Ind Eng, vol. 111, pp. 467–480, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.011.

R. B. Graham, M. J. Agnew, and J. M. Stevenson, ‘Effectiveness of an on-body lifting aid at reducing low back physical demands during an automotive assembly task: Assessment of EMG response and user acceptability’, Appl Ergon, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 936–942, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.01.006.

S. De Bock et al., “Benchmarking occupational exoskeletons: An evidence mapping systematic review,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 98, p. 103582, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103582.

P. Maurice et al., “Objective and subjective effects of a passive exoskeleton on overhead work,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 152–164, 2019.

J. P. Pinho and A. Forner-Cordero, ‘Shoulder muscle activity and perceived comfort of industry workers using a commercial upper limb exoskeleton for simulated tasks’, Appl Ergon, vol. 101, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103718.

G. Ashta, S. Finco, A. Persona, and D. Battini, “Investigating exoskeletons applicability in manufacturing and logistics systems: state of the art and future research directions,” Summer Sch. Francesco Turco Riviera Dei Fiori Italy, 2022

M. P. De Looze, T. Bosch, F. Krause, K. S. Stadler, and L. W. O’Sullivan, “Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load,” Ergonomics, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 671–681, May 2016, doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988.

A. van der Have, M. Rossini, C. Rodriguez-Guerrero, S. Van Rossom, and I. Jonkers, ‘The Exo4Work shoulder exoskeleton effectively reduces muscle and joint loading during simulated occupational tasks above shoulder height’, Appl Ergon, vol. 103, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103800.

L. Van Engelhoven, N. Poon, H. Kazerooni, D. Rempel, A. Barr, and C. Harris-Adamson, ‘Experimental Evaluation of a Shoulder-Support Exoskeleton for Overhead Work: Influences of Peak Torque Amplitude, Task, and Tool Mass’, IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors, vol. 7, no. 3–4, pp. 250–263, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/24725838.2019.1637799.

C. Dahmen and M. Hefferle, “Application of ergonomic assessment methods on an exoskeleton centered workplace,” in Proceedings of the XXXth Annual Occupational Ergonomics and Safety Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2018, pp. 7–8.

G. Borg, Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Human kinetics, 1998.

I. Kuorinka et al., Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms, vol. 18, no. 3. Elsevier, 1987, pp. 233–237.

A. Frasie, M. Bertrand-Charette, M. Compagnat, L. J. Bouyer, and J.-S. Roy, ‘Validation of the Borg CR10 Scale for the evaluation of shoulder perceived fatigue during work-related tasks’, Appl Ergon, vol. 116, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104200.

L. McAtamney and E. N. Corlett, RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders, vol. 24, no. 2. Elsevier, 1993, pp. 91–99.

D.-C. Anghel, E.-L. Niţu, A.-D. Rizea, A. Gavriluţă, A. Gavriluţă, and N. Belu, “Ergonomics study on an assembly line used in the automotive industry,” in MATEC web of conferences, EDP Sciences, 2019, p. 12001.

M. Gómez-Galán, Á.-J. Callejón-Ferre, J. Pérez-Alonso, M. Díaz-Pérez, and J.-A. Carrillo-Castrillo, “Musculoskeletal Risks: RULA Bibliometric Review,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, vol. 17, no. 12, p. 4354, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124354.

S. Kim, M. A. Nussbaum, M. I. Mokhlespour Esfahani, M. M. Alemi, S. Alabdulkarim, and E. Rashedi, ‘Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part I – “Expected” effects on discomfort, shoulder muscle activity, and work task performance’, Appl Ergon, vol. 70, pp. 315–322, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.025.

A. Brunner et al., ‘Effect of passive shoulder exoskeleton support during working with arms over shoulder level’, Wearable Technologies, vol. 4, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1017/wtc.2023.21.

S. Iranzo, A. Piedrabuena, D. Iordanov, U. Martinez-Iranzo, and J. M. Belda-Lois, ‘Ergonomics assessment of passive upper-limb exoskeletons in an automotive assembly plant’, Appl Ergon, vol. 87, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103120.

J. Masood, E. Triviño-Tonato, M. D. P. Rivas-Gonzalez, M. D. M. Arias-Matilla, and A. E. Planas-Lara, ‘Subjective Perception of Shoulder Support Exoskeleton at Groupe PSA’, in Biosystems and Biorobotics, vol. 27, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2022, pp. 559–563. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-69547-7_90.

A. Baldassarre et al., “Industrial exoskeletons from bench to field: Human-machine interface and user experience in occupational settings and tasks,” Front. Public Health, vol. 10, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1039680.

P. N. Darma, B. Sun, P. A. Sejati, and M. Takei, ‘Local Muscle Quality Imaging in Human Calf by Phase Angle Electrical Impedance Tomography (ΦEIT)’, IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, vol. 73, pp. 1–11, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2024.3369128.

P. Darma, S. Chedana, M. Jumaldin, and E. Kahuripan, Pemantauan Kualitas Otot Secara Real-Time Pada Aktivitas Kerja Berat dengan Sistem ExoEIT (Exoskeleton Electrical Impedance Tomography)’, 000997006, Oct. 15, 2025



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/juliet.v7i1.113187

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 207 | views : 92

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Listrik, Instrumentasi, dan Elektronika Terapan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

SINTA 2 accredited based on Decree of the Director General of Research and Development, Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology No. 295/C/C3/KPT/2026, Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024) - Vol. 10 No. 1 (2029)

e-ISSN: 2746-2536