Evolution in Visual Communication of the Javanese Printed Wedding Invitations


Diah Kristina(1*), Nur Saptaningsih(2)

(1) English Department, Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) English Department, Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author


Printed wedding invitations have been one of the most crucial aspects in the social organization among many countries like Brunei Darussalam, Iran, Egypt, and Persia. Javanese people also pay special attention to this social document as it represents social class, social status, prestige, and fnancial support allocated by the host. Evolution of printed Javanese wedding invitations represent social and economic pressures. The diasporic communities who were absent to earn a living brought a noticeable change by setting up the bride’s parents’ photographs in the invitations. 15 invitation texts were selected ranging from 1980 – 2017 used in Tawangmangu, Wonogiri and Sukoharjo, the eastern part of Central Java, Indonesia. There was a consistent regularity in terms of rhetorical structure. Functionally, the invitations have the same role of inviting prospective guests to share happiness in a more family-bound relationship. Inclusion of parents’ photographs, map of the location, pre-wedding photos, wise words, calendar, the profle of the couple were indicators of transformation taking place. Later, the printing decision of the invitations is pretty much customer-driven informed by the customers’ needs, values, and beliefs. Rhetorically the materialistically-driven social phenomenon was shown by an explicit gifts desired.


evolution; wedding invitation; rhetorical structure; materialistically-driven

Full Text:



Atkinson, D. (1996). The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society, 25(3), 333–371.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Baumgartner, T. A., & Hensley, L. D. (2006). Conducting and reading research in health and human performance (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Bhatia, V. K. (2004). World of written discourse: A genrebased view (advances in applied linguistics). London: Sage Publication.

Briggs, C. L., & Bauman, R. (1992). Genre, intertextuality and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2(2), 131–172.

Cap, P., & Okulska, U. (2013). Analyzing genres in political communication. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamin.

Chang, Y.-Y., & Swales, J. (1999). Informal elements in English academic writing: Threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 145–167). London: Longman.

Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. USA: Sage Publications.

Devitt, A. J. (1993). Generalizing about genre: New conceptions of an old concept. College Composition and Communication, 44(4), 573–586.

Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Paré, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and
workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fairclough, N. (1992a). Critical Language Awareness. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992b). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalization. London: Routledge.

Freedman, A., & Adam, C. (2000). Write where you are: Situating learning to write in the university and workplace settings. In P. Dias & A. Paré (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 31–60). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (1994). Genre and the new rhetoric. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Ger, G., & Belk, R. W. (1996). Cross Cultural Differences in Materialism. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(95)00035-6

Gregersen, A. (2011). Genre, technology and embodied interaction: The evolution of digital game genres and motion gaming. Medie Kultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 27(51), 94–109.

Gross, A. G., Harmon, J. E., & Reidy, M. S. (2002). Communicating science: The scientifc article from the 17th century to the present. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hanks, W. F. (1989). Text and textuality. Annual Review of Anthropology, 18, 95–127.

Harwood, N. (2006). In(appropriate) personal pronoun use in political science: A qualitative study and a proposed heuristic for future research. Written Communication, 23(4), 424–450.

Horner, B. (1999). The birth of basic writing. In B. Horner & M. Zhan-Lu (Eds.), Representing the other: Basic writers and the teaching of basic writing (pp. 3–29). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Hyland, K. (1999). Disclipinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99–121). London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in the three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693–722.

Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Koentjaraningrat. (1990). Pengantar ilmu antropologi. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Kubota, R. (1998). Ideologies of English in Japan. World Englishes, 17(3), 295–306.

Lemke, J. L. (1992). Interpersonal meaning in discourse: Value orientations. In M. Davies & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice (pp. 82–104). London: Pinter Publishers.

Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and deep theorizing. Journal of Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308319229

Martynuska, M. (2009). The evolution of western genre resulting from social changes in the USA. Studia Anglica Resoviensia (Literary and Cultural Studies), 6, 59–67.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Miller, C. R. (1994). Genre as social action. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 20–36). London: Taylor & Francis.

Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientifc knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconcin Press.

Odell, L., Goswami, D., & Herrington, A. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in non-academic settings. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 220–236). New York: Longman.

Paré, A. (2000). Writing as a way into social work: Genre sets, genre systems, and distributed cognition. In P. Dias & A. Paré (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in Academic and Workplace Settings (pp. 145–166). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Paré, A., & Roy, R. (2002). The evolution of an educational journal: A genre study. Technostyle, 17(2), 31–54.

Paré, A., & Smart, G. (1994). Observing genres in action: Towards a research methodology. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.

Plett, H. F. (1991). “Intertextualities.” In H. F. Plett (Ed.), Intertextuality (pp. 3–29). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Singh, R. (2015). On the genre of autobiography: Typology and evolution. The Delhi University Journal of the Humanities & the Social Sciences, 2(2015), 76–86.

Smart, G. (1992). Exploring the social dimension of a workplace genre and the implications for teaching. Carleton Papers in Applied Language Studies, 9(1992), 33–46.

Smart, G. (1993). Genre as community invention: A central bank’s response to its executives’ expectations as readers. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 124–140). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Smart, G. (1998). Mapping conceptual worlds: Using interpretive ethnography to explore knowledgemaking in a professional community. The Journal of Business Communication, 35(1), 111–127.

Soekanto, S. (1990). Sosiologi: Suatu pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Sunarto. (2015). Budaya mbecek dalam perspektif agama, sosial dan ekonomi di Kabupaten Ponorogo. Presented at the Seminar Hasil-Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. Retrieved from http://eprints.umpo.ac.id/1997/1/38.SUNARTO.pdf

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2000). Language for specifc purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 59–76.

Ventola, E., & Mauranen, A. (1991). Non-native writing and native revising of scientifc articles. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp. 457–492). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

Wodak, R. (2000). Recontextualization and the transformation of meanings: A critical discourse analysis of decision making in EU-meetings about employment policies. In S. Sarangi & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Discourse and Social Life (pp. 185–206). Harlow: Pearson Education.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.38222

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 637 | views : 772


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Humaniora

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2302-9269 (online); ISSN 0852-0801 (print)
Copyright © 2020 Humaniora, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada