KISAH ULAMA/KIAI SEBAGAI STRATEGI PENYAMPAIAN PESAN WARGA NAHDLATUL ULAMA ETNIK MADURA

https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v26i3.6192

Akhmad Haryono(1*)

(1) Program Studi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Jember
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article describes the telling of the story of adorable ulama/kiai (moslem religious leader) as communication strategy. The study uses the qualitative method by applying ethnography of communication approach. It collected the data through participatory observation and non participatory observation, interview, and recording. It transcribed the data in the form of recordings into a written form and analyzed them descriptively using ethnographic methods of communication through speech component analysis, and discourse analysis with the concept of pragmatics. The research result shows that the telling of the story of ulama/kiai in the speech can be used as a strategy for delivering messages among the members of Nahdlatul Ulama of Madurese ethnic group. It can raise the audience’s concentration to listen and understand the speech delivered by the speakers.


Keywords


communication strategy, message, Madurese ethnic group, Nahdlatul Ulama

Full Text:

PDF


References

Grice, H.P. (1975). “Logic and Conversation”, dalam Cole dan Morgen. Radical Pragmatics. New York: Akademic Press, hal. 41-58.

Haryono, A. (2007). “Sistem Komunikasi di Pesantren Salaf: Kesenjangan Hubungan Sosiolinguistik antara Kyai dan Santri” dalam Kultur (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora), Vol 1/No 1/2007. hal. 51-68. Lemlit Universitas Jember.

____. ( 2011). “Pola Komunikasi Warga NU Etnis Madura Sebagai Refleksi Budaya Paternalistik” dalam Humaniora, Volume 23, No.2, Juni 2011. hal. 175-184. Yogyakarta: FIB UGM.

____. (2013). Pola Komunikasi Warga NU Etnik Madura di Jember: Kajian Etnografi Komunikasi. (Tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Univesitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Hymes. D. (1961). “Function of Speech: an Evolutionary Approach”, dalam Fridrich C. Gruber, ed. Anthropology and Education, PP. 55-83. Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

____. (1964a). “Introduction: Toward Ethnographies of Communication”. In American Anthropoligiest 66. Special Publication: J.J. Gumperz & D. Hymes. (eds.) The Ethnography of Communication, PP. 1-34 (Part 2)

____. (1972a). “Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life” in Gumperz and. Paris: Mouton. Hymes (eds.). 1972.

Kuswarno, Engkus. (2008). Etnografi Komunikasi: Suatu Pengantar dan Contoh Penelitiannya. Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.

Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Terjem. dari The Principle of Pragmatics. Penterj.: Oka. Jakarta:UI Press

Lyon, J. (1972). “Human Language”. In R.A. Hinde (ed.) Non Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, PP. 49-85

Nadar, F.X. (2009). Pragmatik & Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Saville-Troike, M. (2003). Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction. New York: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Hongkong: Oxford University Press.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v26i3.6192

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 585 | views : 601

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 Akhmad Haryono

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 2302-9269 (Online)


web counter View My Stats