A Cultural Heritage Management Perspective: Kotabaru, Yogyakarta, between a Protected Cultural Site and a Commercial Area

https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.67216

Fahmi Prihantoro(1*)

(1) Department of Archaeology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Yogyakarta’s Kotabaru area is one of rich cultural heritage, with a protected cultural status that means it must be preserved. Presently, Kotabaru faces the threat of destruction as a consequence of its developing business and services sectors. The changing of building functions, together with new developments, is ever-increasing with each year. This research sought to study what is occurring between the preservation of the Kotabaru area and the development of its economic sector, as well as how efforts can be made to solve the problems of the threat of destruction to protected cultural sites within the area, using the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) approach. The findings revealed that there are competing interests in the Kotabaru area, between preservation and economic development, which contribute to the emergence of a threat to the preservation of protected cultural sites. To solve this problem, the HUL approach should be used and, in particular, the approach contained in the UNESCO recommendation on managing cultural heritage. With these findings, it is hoped that they will be able to serve as a reference concept for the solving of the issues that are occurring in the Kotabaru area, from a perspective of cultural heritage management.

Keywords


cultural heritage management; Historic Urban Landscape; Kotabaru Yogyakarta

Full Text:

PDF


References

Adrisijanti, Inajati dan Anggraeni (Ed) (2014). Mosaik Warisan Budaya Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya Yogyakarta.

Asriana & Sesotyaningtyas (2018). Pendekatan Historic Urban landscape Untuk Pelestarian Kawasan Kampung Al-Munawar 13 Ulu, Palembang. Temu Ilmiah Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia (IPLBI) 7, J051-057.

Bandarin, F dan R. van Oers (2012). The Historic Urban Landscape: Managing Heritage in Urban Century. West Sussex: Viley; Blackwell.

Bogaers, E. & Ruijter, P. de (1986). Ir Thomas Karsten and Indonesian Town Planning, 1915–1940. In P.J.M. Nas (Ed.), The Indonesian city (pp. 71–88). Dordrecht: Foris.

Bruggen, M.P. van & R.S. Wassing (1988). Djokja En Solo: Beeld van de Vorstensteden. Asia Maior.

Byrne, D. (2001). Social Significance: A Discussion Paper. NSW National Park and Wildlife Service.

Daldanise Gaia (2016). Innovative Strategies of Urban Heritage Management for Sustainable Local Development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223.

Darvill, T. (1987). Ancient Monuments in the Countryside: An Archeological Management Review. London: Historic Building and Monuments Commission for England.

Dinas Sosial Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (1983). Replika Sejarah Perjuangan Rakyat Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Dinas Sosial Provinsi DIY.

Dingemans, L.F. (1926). Gegevens over Jogjakarta 1926, Vol. A. Djogjakarta: H. Bunning.

Hadiyanto Eko (2017). Konservasi dan Pengendalian Kotabaru. Bulletin Mayangkara, 4. Dinas Kebudayaan DIY.

Hodder, I. (1998). The past as passion and play Catalhoyuk as a site of conflict in the construction of multiple pasts. In Lynn Meskell (Ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East (pp. 124-139). London: Routledge.

Howard, E. (1902). Garden Cities of To-Morrow. London, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd. Paternoster Square.

Ikaputra (2017). Kotabaru Garden City Ing Ngayogyakarta. Bulletin Mayangkara, 4. Dinas Kebudayaan DIY.

Junawan, M. (1998). Kotabaru: Pola Pemukiman Masyarakat Belanda di Kota Yogyakarta Tahun 1899-1936. Skripsi. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

McGimsey, C.R. & H. Davis (Ed) (1977). The Management of Archaeological Resource, the Airlie House Report. Special Publication of the Society for American Archaeology.

McKercher, B., & du Cros, H. (2002). Cultural Tourism: The Partnership Between Tourism and Cultural Heritage Management. New York: Routledge.

Prabowo, B.N., Pramesti, P.U., & Sukawi, S. (2020). Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) approach in Kota Lama Semarang: Mapping the Layer of Physical Development Through the Chronological History. IOP Conference Sereies: Earth and environtmental Science, 402. The 3rd International Conference on Sustainability in Architectural Design and Urbanism.

Puczkó, L.A.S.Z.L.O. (2006). Interpretation in Cultural Tourism. In Smith, M. & Robinson, M. (Ed.), Cultural Tourism in a Changing World: Politics, Participation and (re) presentation (pp.227-244). Bristol: Channel View Publications.

Rátz, T. (2006). Interpretation in the house of terror, Budapest. In Smith, M. & Robinson, M (Ed.), Cultural tourism in a changing world: Politics, participation and (re) presentation (pp. 244-56). Bristol: Channel View Publications.

Rauzi, E. N. & Dewi, C. (2017). Historic Urban Landscape: Its Possibilities and Challenge in Banda Aceh. Proceeding International Conference on Rebuilding Place-AVAN.

Suparwoko & Lagonah (2016). Change Analysis of the Cultural Heritage Building Function and Facade in Kotabaru, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. ICSB.

Throsby, D. (1999). Cultural Capital. Journal of cultural economics, 23(1-2), 3-12.

Timmer, P. (2019). New Horizone for Old Tin Mining Town, HUL Quick Scan Muntok West Bangka. Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands.

Umezu, H. Y. S. (2001). Studi Perubahan Urban Fabric di Kawasan Pemukiman Belanda (Studi Kasus Kotabaru, Yogyakarta). Tesis. Magister Perencanaan Kota dan Daerah, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

UNESCO (2016). The HUL Guidebook: Managing Heritage in Dynamic and Constantly Changing Urban Environments. A Practical Guide to UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. http://historicurbanlandscape.com/themes/196/userfiles/download/2016/6/7/wirey5prpznidqx.pdf

Wahyu, T. H. (2011). Pelestarian dan Pemanfaatan Bangunan Indis di Kawasan Kota Baru. Tesis. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Yose, I. W. M. (2005). Kajian Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang Di Kawasan Bersejarah: Kasus Kota BaruYogyakarta. Tesis. Magister Perencanaan Kota dan Daerah, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Regulation
Keputusan Gubernur DIY No 237 Tahun 2017 Tentang Tentang Penetapan Bangunan di Kelurahan Kotabaru, Kecamatan Gondokusuman Sebagai Cagar Budaya.

Keputusan Gubernur DIY No 239 Tahun 2017 Tentang Penetapan Bangunan di Kelurahan Kotabaru, Kecamatan Gondokusuman Sebagai Cagar Budaya.

Keputusan Gubernur DIY No 195 Tahun 2019 Tentang Bangunan di Kelurahan Kotabaru, Kecamatan Gondokusuman, Kota Yogyakarta Sebagai Bangunan Cagar Budaya.

Peraturan Daerah DIY No 1 Tahun 2015 Tentang Rencana Detail Tata Ruang dan Peraturan Zonasi Kota Yogyakarta Tahun 2015-2035.

Peraturan Daerah DIY No 6 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pelestarian Warisan Budaya.

Peraturan Daerah DIY No 1 Tahun 2017 Tentang Arsitektur Berciri Khas Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.

Peraturan Gubernur DIY No 40 tahun 2014 Tentang Panduan Arsitektur Bangunan Baru Bernuansa Daerah.

Peraturan Gubernur DIY No 186 Tahun 2011 Tentang Kawasan Cagar Budaya DIY.

Peraturan Walikota Yogyakarta No 25 Tahun 2013 Tentang Koofisien Dasar Bangunan.

Peraturan Walikota Yogyakarta No 53 Tahun 2017 Tentang Ketinggian Bangunan di Kota Yogyakarta.

Undang-Undang RI No 11 Tahun 2010 Tentang Cagar Budaya.

Undang-Undang RI No 13 Tahun 2012 Tentang Keistimewaan DIY.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.67216

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3821 | views : 2539

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Humaniora

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



free web stats Web Stats

ISSN 2302-9269 (online); ISSN 0852-0801 (print)
Copyright © 2022 Humaniora, Office of Journal & Publishing, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada