From One Project to Another: Unintended Consequences and People’s Expectation of Climate Mitigation Project in Central Kalimantan

https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.74537

Manggala Ismanto(1*)

(1) Department of Anthropology, Brawijaya University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper discusses the dynamics of environmental interventions supported by aid projects and community responses as the subject of intervention. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, I looked into how connections between local and global entities occurred, between the local villagers in Central Kalimantan and the climate mitigation project of REDD +. Both of these entities met when the global discourse on climate change started to gain ground. This paper discusses how environmental interventions lead to different expectations and unintended consequences. I see community responses as choices and decisions which were historically constructed. These choices, expectations, and decisions are related to people’s experience with previous intervention agents and local livelihood dynamics. This local-global interaction has yielded unintended outcomes and led to different expectations for a REDD+’s demonstration activities project. When these two entities - local people and KFCP (Kalimantan Forest Climate Partnership) - meet in the global agenda to mitigate climate change, friction emerges due to a variety of interests in the village. My findings demonstrate how a reforestation program could lead to a socio-economic inequality. Land conflicts are likely to occur because of alternative livelihood programs which introduced rubber seeds.

Full Text:

PDF


References

Agrawal, A. (2002). Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects.
Angelsen, A. (2008). Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options and implications. Cifor.
Cerbu, G. A., Swallow, B. M., & Thompson, D. Y. (2011). Locating REDD: A global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(2), 168–180.
Chomba, S., Kariuki, J., Lund, J. F., & Sinclair, F. (2016). Roots of inequity: How the implementation of REDD+ reinforces past injustices. Land Use Policy, 50, 202–213.
Crewe, E., & Harrison, E. (1998). Whose development. An Ethnography of Aid, 23–65. De-Sardan, J.-P. O. (2005). Anthropology and development: Understanding contemporary social change. Zed books.
Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.
Ferguson, J. (1990). The anti-politics machine:’development’, depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. CUP Archive.
Harrison, E. P. (2015). Impacts of natural resource management programmes on rural livelihoods in Zimbabwe–the ongoing legacies of CAMPFIRE. PSA Conference.
Harvey, C. A., Rambeloson, A. M., Andrianjohaninarivo, T., Andriamaro, L., Rasolohery, A., Randrianarisoa, J., Ramanahadray, S., Christie, M., Siwicka, E., &
Remoundou, K. (2018). Local perceptions of the livelihood and conservation benefits of small-scale livelihood projects in Rural Madagascar. Society &
Natural Resources, 31(9), 1045–1063. Herminasari, N. S. (2013). Mengembalikan Parak Kayu: Siasat Perempuan Kalumpang Menghadapi Program REDD+. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Hobart, M. (2002). An anthropological critique of development: The growth of ignorance. Routledge.
HuMa. (2010). Preliminary Study on the Safeguards Policies of Bilateral Donors to REDD Programs in Indonesia. Jakarta : HuMa.
IAFCP 2010. Konsultasi Masyarakat (Studi Amdal) Rencana Kegiatan Percontohan Pengurangan Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca Akibat Deforestasi dan Degradasi Hutan di Lahan Gambut. Kabupaten Kapuas, Kalimantan Tengah. Presentasi Powerpoint.
Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP). (2009). Design document. Konrad, K. (2006). The social dynamics of expectations: The interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 429–444.
Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Duke University Press.
Loaiza, T., Nehren, U., & Gerold, G. (2015). REDD+ and incentives: An analysis of income generation in forest-dependent communities of the Yasuní Biosphere Reserve, Ecuador. Applied Geography, 62, 225–236.
Lounela, A. (2015). Climate change disputes and justice in C entral K alimantan, I ndonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 56(1), 62–78.
Lounela, A. (2020). Contested values and climate change mitigation in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Social Anthropology, 28(4), 862–880.
Massarella, K., Sallu, S. M., Ensor, J. E., & Marchant, R. (2018). REDD+, hype, hope and disappointment: The dynamics of expectations in conservation and development pilot projects. World Development, 109, 375–385.
Mosse, D. (2005). An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. Cultivating Development.
Mulyani, M., & Jepson, P. (2013). REDD+ and forest governance in Indonesia: A multistakeholder study of perceived challenges and opportunities. The Journal of Environment & Development, 22(3), 261–283.
Noor, M., & Sabiham, I. H. S. (2010). Lahan Gambut. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta. Olbrei, E., & Howes, S. (2012). A very real and practical contribution? Lessons from the Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership. Climate Law, 3(2), 103–137.
O’Malley, P. (1996). Indigenous governance. Economy and Society, 25(3), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149600000017
Poudel, M., Thwaites, R., Race, D., & Dahal, G. R. (2015). Social equity and livelihood implications of REDD+ in rural communities–a case study from Nepal. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1).
Pouliot, M., Treue, T., Obiri, B. D., & Ouedraogo, B. (2012). Deforestation and the limited contribution of forests to rural livelihoods in West Africa: Evidence from Burkina Faso and Ghana. Ambio, 41(7), 738–750.
Ribot, J., & Larson, A. (2012). Reducing REDD risks: Affirmative policy on an uneven playing field. International Journal of the Commons, 6(2).
Schroeder, H. (2010). Agency in international climate negotiations: The case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 317–332.
Than, K. Z., Wen, Y., & Zaw, Z. (2016). Exploring socioeconomic impacts of REDD-plus pilot program to rural livelihoods: Comparative study of Yedashae and Oaktwin Townships in Bago Region of Myanmar. Int. J. Sci, 2, 28–41.
Utama, A. P. W. (2013). Bah Aur Tarus Studi Penguatan Elit Lokal Dalam Implementasi Aawal REDD+. [Yogyakarta]: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Van Lente, H. (2012). Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: Lessons from the sociology of expectations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(8), 769–782.
Vanga, P. M. (2013). Partisipasi Masyarakat Lokal Dalam Program DA-REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) Studi Kasus di Desa Mantangai Hulu, Kecamatan Mantangai, Kabupaten Kapuas, Propinsi Kalimantan Tengah. [Yogyakarta]: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
West, P. (2006). Conservation is our government now: The politics of ecology in Papua New Guinea. Duke University Press.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.74537

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1406 | views : 1447

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Humaniora

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



free web stats Web Stats

ISSN 2302-9269 (online); ISSN 0852-0801 (print)
Copyright © 2022 Humaniora, Office of Journal & Publishing, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada