MEANING-MAKING OF HEDGES IN THE GOSSIP COLUMN OF THE JAKARTA POST

Uswatun Hasanah; Ribut Wahyudi

doi:10.22146/jh.8717

MEANING-MAKING OF HEDGES IN THE GOSSIP COLUMN OF THE JAKARTA POST

https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.8717

Uswatun Hasanah^(1*), Ribut Wahyudi⁽²⁾

(1) Faculty of Humanities, Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University, Malang
(2) Faculty of Humanities, Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University, Malang
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The present study investigates the use of hedges (vague language) as the meaning-making practice in the gossip column of the Jakarta Post. The daily newspaper is chosen due to pragmatic purposes, accessibility, and its national coverage. Adapting the framework of Lakoff (1973), Holmes (1990) and Hyland (1996a-b), this study focuses on the hedges’ functions and meanings in a gossip column (informal context), apart from an academic discourse (formal context) in which hedges are frequently discussed. This possibly leads to the diverse functions and meanings of the hedges’ occurrences within the discourse: through the employment of ‘epistemic modal’ (the expression of uncertainty) and ‘affective’ (the expression of solidarity) function. Further, the mostly-found hedges are the epistemic modal ‘about’ (five times) and the affective modal ‘think’ (four times) from six hedge categories. Eventually, it is also revealed that hedges used in the gossip column are to enhance the self-image and trend-setting identity of the celebrities, who indeed are involved in the discourse.

Keywords

celebrity, gossip, gossip column, hedges, Jakarta Post

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adenan, F. (2001). “Systemic Functional Linguistics: Meaning Carriers in Functional Grammar”. Humaniora, Vol. 12. No. 3, 221-232.

Ahmed, S. (2011). “Analyzing Women’s Talk and Gossip between Two Female Friends”. Leading Undergraduate Work in English Studies 3: 1-14.

Al-Rashady, F. (2012). “Determining The Role of Hedging Devices in The Political Discourse of Two American Presidential Debates in 2008”. TESOL Journal 7: 30-42.

Baumeister, R.F., Zhang L and Vohs K.D. (2004). “Gossip as Cultural Learning”. Review of General Psychology 8 (2): 111-121.

Brown, P., & Levinson S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Conrad, S. (2002). “Corpus Approaches to Discourse Analysis”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 75-95.

Dunbar, R.I.M. (2004). “Gossip in Evolutionary Perspectives”. Review of General Psychology 8 (2): 100-110.

Ellwardt, L., Labianca G and Wittek R. (2012). “Who are The Objects of Positive and Negative Gossip at Work? A Social Network Perspective on Workplace Gossip”. Social Networks 34: 193-205.

Foster, E. K. (2004). “Research on Gossip: Taxonomy, Methods, and Future Directions”. Journal of General Psychology 8 (2): 78-99.

Fox, K. (2001). “Evolution, Alienation and Gossip: The Role of Mobile Telecommunications in The 21st Century”. Social Issues Research Centre. Retrieved on May 17th, 2013 from http://www.sirc.org/publik/gossip.shtml.

Fraser, B. (2010). Hedging in Political Discourse: The Bush 2007 Press Conferences in Okulska, U. & Cap P. (Eds). Perspective in Politics and Discourse (pp.201-213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Gluckman, M. (1963). “Gossip and Scandal”. Current Anthropology 4: 307-316.

Holmes, J. (1990). “Hedges and Boosters in Women’s and Men’s Speech”. Language and Communication 10 (3): 185-205.

Hyland, K. (1994). “Hedging in Academic Writing and EAP Textbooks.” English for Specific Purposes 3 (3): 239-256.

Hyland, K. (1996a). “Nurturing Hedges in The ESP Curriculum”. English for Specific Purposes 24 (4): 477-490.

Hyland, K. (1996b). “Talking to The Academy: Forms of Hedging in Science Research Articles”. Written Communication 13 (2): 251-281.

Hyland, K. (2000). “Hedges, Boosters and Lexical Invisibility: Noticing Modifiers in Academic Texts”. Language Awareness 9 (4): 179-197.

Kurland, N. B., and Pelled L. H. (2000). “Passing The World: Toward a Model of Gossip and Power in The Workplace”. Academy of Management Review 25 (2): 428-438.

Lakoff, G. (1973). “Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and The Logic of Fuzzy Concepts”. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 458-508.

Lee, S-H and Jane E. W. (2013). “Gossip, Self-Monitoring, and Fashion Consumer Groups”. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 31 (2): 67-80.

Martin-Martin, P. (2008). “The Mitigation of Scientific Claims in Research Papers: A Comparative Study”. International Journal of English Studies 8 (2): 133-152.

Meyers, E. A. (2010). “Gossip Talk and Online Community: Celebrity Gossip Blogs and Their Audiences”. Open Access Dissertations. Paper 292. Retrieved on May 18th, 2013 from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations

Niekerk, V. J. (2008). “The Virtue of Gossip”. South Africa Journal of Philosophy 27 (4): 400-412.

Nivales, M. L. M. (2005). “Hedging in College Research Papers: Implications for Language Instruction”. Asian EFL Journal 52: 35-45.

Official Website of Birkbeck University of London. Retrieved on April 28th, 2013 from http://www.bbk.ac.uk/front-page

Official Website of Jakarta Post Newspaper-Online. Retrieved on 16th April, 2013 from www.jakartapost.com

Riekkinen, N. (2009). Softening Criticism: The Use of Lexical Hedges in Academic Spoken Interaction. Unpublished Thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland.

Tugend, A. (2012). Studies Find that Gossip isn’t Just Loose Talk”. The New York Times, B5.

Retrieved on June 2nd, 2013 from www.nytimes.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.8717