Developing a Hybrid Training Curriculum for the Inaugural World Health Organization (WHO) Singapore Emergency Medical Team (SGEMT) Using Andragogical Principles for Adult Training
Abstract
Introduction: The WHO-EMT initiative seeks to “enhance surge capacity of countries through promotion of rapid mobilization and efficient coordination of both national and international medical teams and the health-care workforce to reduce loss of life and prevent long-term disability caused by disasters, outbreaks and other emergencies. It values “inclusiveness, transparency, global cohesion and regional adaptation, needs driven and
adherence to quality standards and methodology. In partnership with the Ministry of Health (MOH) of Singapore, Singapore Health Services (SingHealth) was tasked to help set up Singapore’s inaugural World Health Organisation (WHO) Emergency Medical Team (EMT) – Singapore Emergency Medical Team (SGEMT). Singapore will be the third ASEAN country, after Thailand & Malaysia, to set up such a WHO EMT programme. SGEMT plans to be verified by WHO by 2024. Methods: Our SGEMT is a Type 1 Fixed EMT and will attend to outpatient and emergency patients in the community over a 14-day overseas deployment, and comprises an 18-member medical team with 5 doctors, 10 nurses, 1 rehabilitative physiotherapist, 1 clinical psychologist and 1 clinical support staff. The medical team are volunteers from all across our SingHealth cluster. In addition to this 18-member medical component, there is an additional 15 member administrative and logistic team from MOH and
our designated logistics partner. Our SGEMT therefore comprises 33 members – 18 medical team members and 15 admin / logistics members. In order to adequately prepare all our SGEMT volunteers for deployment, our SingHealth team together with MOH developed a comprehensive and uniquely tailored training programme. The design of this training programme is based on well-established andragogical principles and applications to ensure effective adult learning. Results: All SGEMT volunteers will undergo a three-component hybrid training programme comprising of 1) E-Learning Modules, 2) Face-to-Face Workshop & Table-Top Exercise (TTX) and 3) Ground Deployment Exercise (GDX). Component 2 and 3 aim to help participants consolidate the knowledge acquired in the e-learning component, provide hands-on opportunity to demonstrate both the clinical and non-clinical skills required of SGEMT volunteers. The final integration will first be done via TTX, followed by GDX. Conclusion: The training curriculum and andragogy adopted for SGEMT was to ensure effective adult learning, such that our SGEMT can function seamlessly on the ground once deployed by MOH & WHO.
References
2. Agonács N, Matos J. 2019. “Heutagogy and Self-Determined Learning: A Review of the Published Literature on the Application and Implementation of the Theory.” Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 34 (January):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1562329.
3. Taylor DCM, Hamdy H. 2013. “Adult Learning Theories: Implications for Learning and Teaching in Medical Education: AMEE Guide No. 83.” Medical Teacher 35 (11): e1561-1572. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153.
4. Mukhalalati BA, Taylor A. 2019. “Adult Learning Theories in Context: A Quick Guide for Healthcare Professional Educators.” Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development 6 (April):2382120519840332. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120519840332.
5. Mezirow J. 1978. “Perspective Transformation.” Adult Education 28 (2): 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171367802800202.
6. Habermas J. 2002. “From Kant to Hegel and Back Again – The Move Towards Decentralization.” European Journal of Philosophy 7 (December):129–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00077.
7. Gouthro PA. 2019. “Taking Time to Learn: The Importance of Theory for Adult Education.” Adult Education Quarterly 69 (1): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713618815656.
8. Kang LO, Brian S, Ricca B. 2010. “Constructivism in Pharmacy School.” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 2 (2): 126–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2010.01.005.
9. Scott CJ. 1994. “Applied Adult Learning Theory: Broadening Traditional CME Programs with Self-Guided, Computer-Assisted Learning.” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 14 (2): 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.4750140205.
10. Knowles MS., ed. 1984. Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. 1st ed. Jossey-Bass Management Series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Schön DA. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.
12. Cross KP. 1981. Adults as Learners. Increasing Participation and Facilitating Learning. Jossey-Bass, Inc.
13. Biggs J. 1996. “Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment.” Higher Education 32 (3): 347–64.
Copyright (c) 2025 ASEAN Journal of Disaster Health Management (AJDHM)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© [2024] [Asean Journal of Disaster Health Management]. All rights reserved.
Asean Journal of Disaster Health Management is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
You are welcome to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following conditions:
- Attribution — Please provide appropriate credit, a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests we endorse you or your use.
- NonCommercial — Kindly refrain from using the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
For further details, kindly visit the Creative Commons website.
1.jpg)
1.jpg){kind=icon}
1.jpg)
