Issue

Vol 36 No 3 (2021): September

Date Log

Submitted
Mar 3, 2021
Accepted
Sep 6, 2021
Published
Sep 29, 2021
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright

Upon acceptance of an article, authors transfer copyright to the JIEB as part of a journal publishing agreement, but authors still have the right to share their article for personal use, internal institutional use, and for any use permitted under the CC BY-SA license

Open Access

Articles are freely available to the public without any subscription with permitted reuse. For open access articles, permitted third party (re)use is defined by the following Creative Commons user licenses: Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-SA).

The Study of Mangrove Ecosystems’ Services Valuation in Semarang City

https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v36i3.1395
Tito Aditya Perdana
titoadityap92@gmail.com
Febrianur Ibnu Fitroh Sukono Putra
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semaran
Risanda Alirastra Budiantoro
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

Corresponding Author(s) : Tito Aditya Perdana

titoadityap92@gmail.com

Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, Vol 36 No 3 (2021): September

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: This study estimates how much economic value will be lost from contact activities within the coastal areas in the research location. Background Problems: The area of Semarang City has flood and tidal problems, the damage to the mangrove forests in Semarang City began with the boom in shrimp farming between 1980 and 1990. Hopefully, this valuation can provide an overview of the current health of the ecosystem and become the basis for a mangrove management strategy in the future. Novelty: The novelty of this study is that it uses a sharper satellite (Image Pleades Resolution 0.5 m) to calculate the mangrove area in the research location. Research Methods: This research uses a total economic valuation, an estimation of the mangrove’s carbon stock and heavy metals, the replacement cost to prevent tidal flooding, and the willingness to pay. Findings/Results: We find that the existing economic value in the study area is very large and should be preserved for conservation. Conclusion: The environment cannot produce something instantly, but it needs to be preserved as a balance to nature.

Keywords

willingness to pay contingent valuation environmental valuation mangrove
Perdana, T. A., Febrianur Ibnu Fitroh Sukono Putra, & Risanda Alirastra Budiantoro. (2021). The Study of Mangrove Ecosystems’ Services Valuation in Semarang City. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 36(3), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v36i3.1395
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Ariftia, R. I., Qurniati, R., & Herwanti, S. (2014). Nilai ekonomi total hutan mangrove desa Margasari kecamatan Labuhan Maring¬gai kabupaten Lampung Timur. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 2(3), 19-28.
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Semarang. (2016). Kecamatan Genuk Dalam Angka 2017.
  3. _____. KecamatanTugu Dalam Angka 2017.
  4. _____. (2018). Kecamatan Genuk Dalam Angka 2018.
  5. _____. Kecamatan Semarang Barat Dalam Angka 2018.
  6. _____. (2019). Kecamatan Genuk Dalam Angka 2019.
  7. _____. Kecamatan Semarang Barat Dalam Angka 2019.
  8. _____. Kecamatan Tugu Dalam Angka 2019.
  9. Barton, D. N. (1994). Economic factors and valuation of tropical coastal resources.
  10. Brower, J. E., Zar, J. H., & Von Ende, C. N. (1998). Field and laboratory methods for general ecology.
  11. Cintron, G., & Schaeffer Novelli, Y. (1984). Methods for studying mangrove struc¬ture. Monographs on oceanographic metho-dology, 8, 91-113.
  12. Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. (1968). Resource conser¬vation: economics and policies. Univ of California Press.
  13. Davis, R. K. (1963). Recreation planning as an economic problem. Nat. Resources J., 3, 239.
  14. Dharmawan, I. W. E., & Pramudji, S. (2017). Panduan Pemantauan Komunitas Mang-rove. Pusat Penelitian Oseanografi LIPI. Jakarta.
  15. Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Jawa Tengah. (2016). Kerangka Acuan Kerja (KAK) Rehabilitasi dan Konservasi Sumberdaya Kelautan dan Perikanan Tahun 2016.
  16. Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kota Semarang. 2010. Laporan Akhir Penyusunan Pemetaan Potensi Kerusakan dan Model Rehabilitasi Kawasan Pesisir Kota Semarang.
  17. _____. 2010. Kota Semarang Dalam Angka. Semarang. Pemerintah Kota Semarang.
  18. _____. 2014. Kota Semarang Dalam Angka. Semarang. Pemerintah Kota Semarang.
  19. _____. 2015. Perikanan Dalam Angka. Semarang. Pemerintah Kota Semarang.
  20. Dinas Kelautan Perikanan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 2013. Kota Semarang Dalam Ang¬ka. Semarang. Pemerintah Kota Semarang. Direktorat Pesisir dan Lautan Direktorat Jenderal Kelautan, Pesisir dan Pulau-pulau Kecil Departemen Kelautan dan Perikanan. 2007. Dalam Panduan Lokakarya Nasional Pengelolaan Jasa Kelautan dan Perikanan. Hotel Bumikarsa Jakarta, tanggal 19 – 20 Juni 2007.
  21. Duke, N., Nagelkerken, I., Agardy, T., Wells, S., & Van Lavieren, H. (2014). The importance of mangroves to people: A call to action. United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC).
  22. Eggleston, S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., & Tanabe, K. (Eds.). (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (Vol. 5). Hayama, Japan: Insti¬tute for Global Environmental Strategies.
  23. Fajrin, F. M., Muskananfola, M. R., & Hendrarto, B. (2016). Karakteristik Abrasi dan Pengaruhnyaterhadap Masyarakat di Pesisir Semarang Barat. Journal of Management of Aquatic Resources, 5(2), 43-50.
  24. Fauzi, A. (2004). Ekonomi sumber daya alam dan lingkungan: Teori dan aplikasi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  25. Freeman III, A. M., Herriges, J. A., & Kling, C. L. (2014). The measurement of environ¬mental and resource values: theory and methods. Routledge.
  26. Hamrick, K., & Goldstein, A. (2016). Raising ambition: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2016. Ecosystem Marketplace Washington DC http://www. forest-trends. org/documents/files/doc_5242. pdf.
  27. Hanley, N., & Spash, C. (1996). Cost benefit analysis and the environment.
  28. Indonesia, S. N. (2011). Pengukuran dan penghi¬tungan cadangan karbon–Pengukuran lapangan untuk penaksiran cadangan karbon hutan (ground based forest carbon accounting). Badan Standarisasi Indonesia. SNI, 7724, 2011.
  29. Islam, L. J. F., Prasetyo, Y., & Sudarsono, B. (2017). Analisis Penurunan Muka Tanah (Land Subsidence) Kota Semarang Menggunakan Citra Sentinel-1 Berdasarkan Metode Din SAR pada Perangkat Lunak SNAP. Jurnal Geodesi Undip, 6(2), 29-36.
  30. IUCN & Mangrove Action Project. (2007). Kebijakan Untuk MANGROVE. mangroveactionproject.org/
  31. Karunia, I. (2017). Estimasi Kerugian Ekonomi Masyarakat Akibat Banjir Rob di Pemu¬kiman Kecamatan Genuk Kota Semarang.
  32. Kauffman, J. B., & Donato, D. C. (2012). Protocols for the measurement, monitoring and reporting of structure, biomass, and carbon stocks in mangrove forests (pp. 50-p). Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
  33. Kementerian Kehutanan. 2012. Data dan Infor¬masi Mangrove Sempadan Pantai. Direk¬torat Jenderal Bina Pengelolaan DAS dan Perhutanan Nasional. Jakarta.
  34. Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Republik Indonesia. 2019. Ran¬cangan Teknokratik. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2020-2024.
  35. Kitamura, S., Anwar, C., Chaniago, A., & Baba, S. (1997). Handbook of Mangroves in Indo¬nesia; Bali & Lombok. International society for mangrove ecosystem. Denpasar, 119.
  36. Kota Semarang Dalam Angka. 2017. Diterbitkan oleh Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Semarang. Publikasi ini berisi data dan informasi mengenai kondisi daerah Kota Semarang dari berbagai aspek/sektor utama nya pada tahun 2016.
  37. Kusrini, M. D., Ul-Hasanah, A. U., & Endarwin, W. (2008). Pengenalan Herpetofauna-Disampaikan Pada Pekan Ilmiah Kehutanan Nasional. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
  38. Miladan, N. (2009). Kajian kerentanan wilayah pesisir Kota Semarang terhadapperubahan iklim.
  39. Mukherjee, N., Sutherland, W. J., Dicks, L., Huge, J., Koedam, N., & Dahdouh-Guebas, F. (2014). Ecosystem service valuations of mangrove ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises. PloS one, 9(9), e107706.
  40. Prayogi, H., Wijayanto, D., & Raysina, N. (2017). Kajian valuasi ekonomi hutan mangrove di Desa Pantai Mekar, Kecamatan Muara Gembong, Kabupaten Bekasi.
  41. Ruitenbeek, H. J. (1992). Mangrove manage-ment: An economic analysis of management options with a focus on Bintuni Bay, Irian Jaya. Menteri Negara Kependudukan dan Lingkungan Hidup.
  42. Safitri, F., Suryanti, S., & Febrianto, S. (2019). Analisis Perubahan Garis Pantai Akibat Erosi di Pesisir Kota Semarang. GEOMATIKA, 25(1), 37-46.
  43. SNI. 2011. Pengukuran dan Penghitungan Cadangan Karbon-Pengukuran Lapangan Untuk Penaksiran Cadangan Karbon Hutan (ground based forest carbon accounting). Badan Standarisasi Nasional (BSN). Jakarta.
  44. Suripin, S., & Syafrudin, S. (2015). Pengaruh land subsidence terhadap genangan banjir dan rob di Semarang Timur. Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil, 21(1), 1-12.
  45. Suzana, B. O. L., Timban, J., Kaunang, R., & Ahmad, F. (2011). Valuasi Ekonomi Sum¬berdaya Hutan Mangrove Di Desa Palaes Kecamatan Likupang Barat Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Agri-Sosioekonomi, 7(2), 29-38.
  46. Tomlison, P. B. (1986). The botany of mangrove. Cambridge University Prees.
  47. WWF-US Climate Adaptation Program. (2009). Building Mangrove Resilience to Climate Change. https://www.worldwildlife.org/
  48. YKAN. 2019. Pemetaan Partisipatif di Kawasan Pesisir Kota Semarang Tahun 2019. Mangrove Ecosystem Restorarion Alliance (MERA). Jakarta.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 581 Download : 825