Issue

Vol 37 No 1 (2022): January

Date Log

Submitted
Mar 19, 2021
Accepted
Dec 31, 2021
Published
Jan 31, 2022
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright

Upon acceptance of an article, authors transfer copyright to the JIEB as part of a journal publishing agreement, but authors still have the right to share their article for personal use, internal institutional use, and for any use permitted under the CC BY-SA license

Open Access

Articles are freely available to the public without any subscription with permitted reuse. For open access articles, permitted third party (re)use is defined by the following Creative Commons user licenses: Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-SA).

Calibrating the Final Results of the Hay System of Job Evaluation Using Urgency, Seriousness, and Growth (USG) Analysis in Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v37i1.1475
Haspul Naser Haspul Naser
haspul1963@gmail.com
Nurwulan Kusuma Devi
Department of Management, STIMA IMMI Jakarta
Nurul Wahdini
Department of Management, STIMA IMMI Jakarta

Corresponding Author(s) : Haspul Naser Haspul Naser

haspul1963@gmail.com

Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, Vol 37 No 1 (2022): January

Abstract

Introduction/ Main Objectives: The research argues that the job evaluation process may not reflect a sense of justice, that is, in most cases, the decisions of the board of directors (BOD) appear to be biased. Background Problems: Lack of transparency and unfairness in job evaluations may create disharmony in the workplace. Novelty: The researchers used the Urgency, Seriousness, and Growth (USG) analysis to find the root cause of employees’ dissatisfaction because of unfairness in the final job size, which may impact the wages. The researchers were also required to be familiar and have experience with the Hay System. Research Methods: To adjust the job size and to promote fairness, the Hay System needs to be strengthened with the USG analysis. This study uses a qualitative approach and requires a more in-depth analysis to obtain the best results. Findings/ Results: The job evaluation only refers to the Hay System. The job analysis, benchmark, and survey are not used as a reference or to interview the managers. If the Hay system is solely used, the final result of the job evaluation can be biased;. therefore, it is necessary to get a second opinion to create a sense of fairness. One of the tools to calibrate the final result of job evaluation is the USG analysis. Conclusion: USG analysis is to provide a second opinion and can also strengthen the job size analysis with the job reference level.

Keywords

USG Method The Hay System of Job Evaluation remuneration system
Haspul Naser, H. N., Kusuma Devi, N., & Wahdini, N. (2022). Calibrating the Final Results of the Hay System of Job Evaluation Using Urgency, Seriousness, and Growth (USG) Analysis in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 37(1), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v37i1.1475
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. A. Riswanto. (2016b). Kemiskinan: Faktor Penyebab dan Analisis Pemecahan Masalah Poverty: Cuses and Troubleshooting Analysis A Riswanto. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 7(1), 59–72.
  2. Ali EL-Hajji, M. (2013). The Ideology of Job Evaluation-A Critical Analysis. Journal of Human Resources Management and Labor Studies, 1(2), 11–25. www.aripd.org/jhrmls
  3. Ariyanti, N. S., Adha, M. A., Sumarsono, R. B., & Sultoni, S. (2020). Strategy to Determine the Priority of Teachers’ Quality Problem Using USG (Urgency, Seriousness, Growth) Matrix. International Research-Based Edu¬ca¬tion Journal, 2(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.17977/um043v2i2p54-62
  4. Armstrong, M, & Stephens, T. (2005). Employee Reward Management and Practice.
  5. Armstrong, Michael, 2011–A handbook of employee reward management and practice / Michael Armstrong. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
  6. Armstrong, Michael. (2011). Armstrong’S Handbook Handbook . http://196.29.172.66:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2178/1/152.pdf
  7. Chaneta, I. (2014a). Effects of job evaluation on decisions involving pay equity. Asian Social Science, 10(4), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n4p145
  8. Chaneta, I. (2014b). Effects of job evaluation on decisions involving pay equity. Asian Social Science, 10(4), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n4p145
  9. Chaniago, A. (2017). Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan. In T. LP3i (Ed.), Teknik Peng-ambilan Keputusan (1 Edition). Penerbit Lentera Ilmu Cendekia.
  10. Choudhary, S., & Singh, G. G. (2016). Job Evaluation: a Strategy for Compensation Consistency. International Journal of Advanced Research in ISSN: 2278-6236 Management and Social Sciences, 5(5), 90–100.
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2014). RESEARCH DESIGN: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach (4 Edition). SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.
  12. Deborah. (2000). Equal pay for equal work: The role of job evaluation in an evolving social norm. Journal of Economic Issues, 34(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2000.11506241
  13. Dessler, G. (2005). The Strategic Role of Human Resource Management After studying this chapter, you should be able to :
  14. Dessler, G. (2005). The Strategic Role of Human Resource Management. The Strategic Role of Human Resources Management.. Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
  15. EL-Hajji, M. A. (2015). The Hay System of Job Evaluation: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Human Resources Management and Labor Studies, 3(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15640/jhrmls.v3n1a1
  16. Gunawan. (2018). Rekondisi Silabus Matakuliah Pendidikan Agama Islam Pada Prodi Desain Grafis Konsentrasi Multimedia Politeknik Negeri Media Kreatif Psdd Medan. Rekondisi Silabus Matakuliah Pendidikan Agama Islam Pada Prodi Desain Grafis Konsentrasi Multimedia Politeknik Negeri Media Kreatif Psdd Medan, 25, 80–91.
  17. Hanlon, M. (n.d.). a. b. c. d. 1981.
  18. Hay System. 2017. "Job Evaluation: Founda-tions and Applications." Korn Ferry (Hay Group).
  19. HayGroup. (2017). Job Evaluation: Foundations and Applications. Korn Ferry (Hay Group).
  20. Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159587
  21. Jiang, Z., Xiao, Q., Qi, H., & Xiao, L. (2009). Total Reward Strategy: A Human Resources Management Strategy Going with the Trend of the Times. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(11), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v4n11p177
  22. John Bratton & Jeffrey Gold. (2017). Human resource management: theory and practice. Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.12737/1711-1
  23. John Bratton & Jeffrey Gold. (2017). Human resource management: theory and practice. Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice.
  24. Kahya, E. (2018). A wage model consisted of job evaluation, employee characteristics and job performance. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 24(4), 720–729. https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2017.92609
  25. Kartikasari, S. &. (2017). Analisa Jabatan & Evaluasi Jabatan untuk menentukan Tingkat Gaji Karyawan. Vol1.No.1.(Maret 2017).
  26. Kipkemboi, A. & C. (2016). Effects of Job Evaluation on Employee Performance in the. May.
  27. Koyan, P. D. . W. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. 1, 247.
  28. LAN. (2008). Analisis Kebijakan Publik Modul Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Kepemimpinan Tingkat III. 62 21.
  29. Lembaga Administrasi Negara - Republik Indo¬ne¬sia 2008. Isu Aktual Sesuai Tema. Modul Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Kepemimpinan Tingkat III
  30. Lembaga Administrasi Negara RI. (2008). Isu Aktual Sesuai Tema. Modul Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Kepemimpinan Tingkat III.
  31. Mabaso, C. M., & Dlamini, B. I. (2017). Impact of Compensation and Benefits on Job Satisfaction. Research Journal of Business Management, 11(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjbm.2017.80.90
  32. Masiani, K. (2017). Peningkatan Kompetensi Staf Pengelola Perpustakaan dalam Upaya Optimalisasi Pelayanan terhadap Pemus-taka. Jurnal Pari, 3(2), 99–104.
  33. Matthew B. Miles & Michael Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. In 2 ND EDITION (Ed.), Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209939.n11
  34. Michael Armstrong. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource management Practice. In Kogan Page (Edition 10). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02319.x
  35. Muga, G. O. (2014). Effect of Management Style on Job Evaluation In Public Corpo-rations: A Case Study of Jomo Kenyatta Foundation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(4), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v4-i4/747
  36. Priyono, M. . I. &. (2013). Penelitian Kualitatif. Manajemen & Bisnis. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9).
  37. Santoso, A. C. (2017). Strategi Pemasaran dengan Mengurangi Komplain Konsumen pada UKM SKD. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multidisiplin Ilmu Unisbank, 151–158. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/173442-ID-strategi-pemasaran-dengan-mengurangi-kom.pdf
  38. Secapramana, L. V. H., Patricia, H., & Nugroho, E. (2019). Job Satisfaction, Job Fairness, and Job Evaluation as an Initial Step of Reward Management System Development: The Implementation of Quality of Work Life Concept. Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, 008(02), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2019.008.02.1
  39. Simatupang, B. S. B., & Kartikasari, D. (2017). Tingkat Gaji Karyawan (Studi Pada Pt Nok Precision Component Batam). Journal of Applied Business Administration, 1(1), 74–81.
  40. Sugiyono. 2013. Management Research Methods. Publisher ALFABETA Bandung. P. 136
  41. Sukwadi, R. (2014). Perbaikan Struktur Gaji Dasar Karyawan Berdasarkan Hasil Anali¬sa dan Evaluasi Jabatan: Vol. Vol.12.No1 (Issue ISSN:1963-6590, pp. 1–112).
  42. Suwandi, E., Imansyah, F. H., & Dasril, H. (2018). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Meng-gu¬nakan Skala Likert pada Layanan Speedy yang Bermigrasi ke Indihome. Jurnal Teknik Elektro, 11.
  43. Tangthong, S. (2014). A causal model of compen¬sation and benefits and reward management on organizational effectiveness of MNCs. Asian Journal of Management Research, 44(1), 44–65.
  44. Ulfatin, N. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods in the Field of Education: Theory and Its Application. Media Nusa Creatu, Malang. http://fia.ub.ac.id/katalog/index.php?p=show_detail&id=8241
  45. Yin, R. K. (2016). Robert K. Yin. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 282 pages. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, October. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1660 Download : 3047