Issue

Vol 39 No 1 (2024): January

Date Log

Submitted
Jul 9, 2022
Accepted
Apr 18, 2023
Published
Jan 18, 2024
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright

Upon acceptance of an article, authors transfer copyright to the JIEB as part of a journal publishing agreement, but authors still have the right to share their article for personal use, internal institutional use, and for any use permitted under the CC BY-SA license

Open Access

Articles are freely available to the public without any subscription with permitted reuse. For open access articles, permitted third party (re)use is defined by the following Creative Commons user licenses: Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-SA).

The Retirement Consumption Puzzle Effect in Indonesia: Evidence from IFLS 4 and 5

https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v39i1.5033
Margareta Vania Putri
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada,
Catur Sugiyanto
catur@ugm.ac.id
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Corresponding Author(s) : Catur Sugiyanto

catur@ugm.ac.id

Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, Vol 39 No 1 (2024): January

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: This study aims to see whether the retirement consumption puzzle occurs in Indonesia. The retirement consumption puzzle refers to when there is a decline in consumption in retirement which is not in line with the life-cycle hypothesis. Background Problems: Previous studies have revealed that consump­tion shifts when entering retirement due to efficient spending. This research analyzes the consumption pattern of the Indonesian elderly peculiarly in the frame of the retirement consumption puzzle. Novelty: There is a lack of studies on the effect of retirement on consumption by Indonesian retirees and prior research has focused on the impact of retirement on household expenditure. Research Methods: This study uses data from the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) wave 4 and 5 from the years 2007 and 2014. It uses panel data and the total sample is 2,556. It also uses the difference in differences (DiD) method to see whether the change in labor status toward retirement causes a decrease in consumption in households in Indonesia. Then, this study also uses the division of age categories as the robustness check. Finding/Results: The results of this study show that there is a retirement consumption puzzle in Indonesia indicated by a decrease of 19.9% in total expenditure per capita. Conclusion: The consumption decrease in retirement demons­trates that the government should consider pension funds and create social security programs to maintain the welfare of elderly people.

Keywords

retirement household consumption life cycle hypothesis DiD
Putri, M. V., & Sugiyanto, C. (2024). The Retirement Consumption Puzzle Effect in Indonesia: Evidence from IFLS 4 and 5. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 39(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v39i1.5033
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Aguila, E., Attanasio, O., & Meghir, C. (2011). Changes in consumption at retirement: evidence from panel data. Review of Econo¬mics and Statistics, 93 (3), 1094-1099.
  2. Banks, James, Blundell, R., & Tanner, S. (1998). Is there a retirement-savings puzzle? The American Economic Review 88, 769-88.
  3. Battistin, E., Brugiavini, A., Rettore, E., & Weber, G. (2009). The retirement consumption puzzle: evidence from a regression discontinuity approach. The American Economic Review, 2209-2226.
  4. Beblo, Miriam., Schreiber, Seven., (2020). leisure and housing consumption after retirement: new evidence on the life-cycle hypothesis. Rev Econ Household 20, 305-220.
  5. Been, Jim., Rohwedder, Susann., Hurd, Michael. (2021). households' joint consumption spending and home production responses to retirement in the us. Rev Econ Household 13, 959-985.
  6. Bonsang, E., & van Soest, A. (2020). Time devoted to home production and retirement in couples: A panel data analysis. Labour Economics, 65(December 2017), 101810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101810
  7. Bernheim, B. D., Skinner, J., & Weinberg, S. (2001). What accounts for the variation in retirement wealth among US households? The American Economic Review 91, 832-57.
  8. Chen, Q., Deng, T., Bai, J., & He, X. (2017). Understanding the retirement-consumption puzzle through the lens of food consumption-fuzzy regression-discontinuity evidence from urban China. Food Policy, 73(September), 45–61. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.09.006
  9. Gertler, J. P., Sebastian, M., Patrick, P., Rawlings, B. L., & Vermeersch, M. C. (2016). Impact evaluation in practice: second edition. Washington DC: World Bank Group.
  10. Hsu, W.-Y., Chen, H., & Weiss, M. A. (2015). The pension option in labor insurance and its effect on household saving and consumption: evidence from Taiwan. The Journal Risk and Insurance 82, 947-975.
  11. Hubbard, R. G., O'brien, A. P., & Rafferty, M. (2014). Macroeconomics (vol. second edition). Pearson Education Limited.
  12. Hurd, M., & Rolnwedder, S. (2003). The retirement-consumption puzzle: anticipated and actual declines in spending at retire¬ment. RAND Labor and Population Program.
  13. Joen, Junkee., Park, Kyunghyung. (2020). Dynamic asset allocation with consumption ratcheting post retirement. Applied Mathe¬matics and Computation 385.
  14. Okamoto, S., Kobayashi, E., & Komamura, K. (2022). The retirement–health puzzle: a sigh of relief at retirement? The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 81(3), 1–54.
  15. Olafsson, A., & Pagel, M. (2020). The retirement-consumption puzzle: New evidence from personal finances. NBBER Working Paper Series, 53. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w24405/w24405.pdf
  16. Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., & Samad, H. A. (2009). Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. World Bank Publications.
  17. Lapau, F. (2017). Evaluasi Dampak Dana Pensiun Terhadap Konsumsi Rumah Tangga di Indonesia: Studi pada Indonesian Life Family Survey. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  18. Li, H., Shi, X., & Wu, B. (2015). The retirement consumption puzzle in China. The American Economic Review Vol. 105, 437-41.
  19. Milevsky, M. A. (2006). The calculus of retirement income: financial models for pension annuities and life insurance. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Redmond, P., & McGuinness, S. (2020). Consumption in Retirement: Heterogeneous Effects by Household Type and Gender. Journal of Population Ageing, 1-19.
  21. Smed, S., Rønnow, H. N., & Tetens, I. (2022). The retirement (food)-consumption puzzle revisited-A panel data study from Denmark. Food Policy, 112, 102330.
  22. Stephens Jr., M., & Toohey, D. (2018). Changes in nutrient intake at retirement. NBER Working Paper Series, 62.
  23. Strauss, J., Witoelar, F., & Sikoki, B. (2016). The fifth wave of the Indonesia family life survey: overview and field report (Vol. 1, pp. 1-94). Santa Monica, CA, USA: Rand.
  24. Tanjung, M. F., & Pratomo, W. A. (2013). Analisis Pemanfaatan Dana Pensiun Terha¬dap Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Hidup PNS Pensiunan Guru Kota Medan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 1(4), 58-67.
  25. Unnikrishnan, V., & Imai, K. S. (2020). Does the old-age pension scheme improve household welfare? Evidence from India. World Development, 134, 105017.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 763 Download : 893