Issue

Vol 38 No 3 (2023): September

Date Log

Submitted
Aug 16, 2022
Accepted
Mar 21, 2023
Published
Sep 11, 2023
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright

Upon acceptance of an article, authors transfer copyright to the JIEB as part of a journal publishing agreement, but authors still have the right to share their article for personal use, internal institutional use, and for any use permitted under the CC BY-SA license

Open Access

Articles are freely available to the public without any subscription with permitted reuse. For open access articles, permitted third party (re)use is defined by the following Creative Commons user licenses: Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-SA).

The Role of Receiving Technology on Employee Performance: Job Satisfaction as Mediation

(Study on the Government of Ternate City)
https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v38i3.5361
Abdullah W. Jabid
abdullah.jabid@unkhair.ac.id
Study Program of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Khairun, North Maluku, 97719, Indonesia
Rinto Syahdan
Study Program of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Khairun, North Maluku, 97719, Indonesia
Johan Fahri
Study Program of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Khairun, North Maluku, 97719, Indonesia
Irfandi Buamonabot
Study Program of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Khairun, North Maluku, 97719, Indonesia

Corresponding Author(s) : Abdullah W. Jabid

abdullah.jabid@unkhair.ac.id

Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, Vol 38 No 3 (2023): September

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: The development of information technology today has resulted in the acceptance of technology being strongly influenced by transformational leadership, system quality, and facilitating conditions, as well as how it can affect employee performance and job satisfaction. Background Problems: Research on how job satisfaction mediates the relationship between employee performance and acceptance still needs to be improved. This research discusses how transformational leadership, facilitating conditions, and system quality shape technology acceptance and employee performance, primarily determined by job satisfaction, especially the mediating effect of job satisfaction on the relationship between techno­logy acceptance and employee performance. Novelty: Inconsistencies both in theory and empirically making it necessary to re-test transformational leadership, system quality, and conditions that facilitate technology acceptance and analyze the effect of technology acceptance on employee performance through job satisfac­tion, both directly and indirectly, in a study of the Ternate City Government. Research Method: 117 respondents were involved in this study. The respondents were determined through purposive sampling. The data were analyzed using partial least squares (PLS) version 3. Seven hypotheses were proposed in this study. Findings: The research findings indicate that system quality and facilitating conditions can predict technology acceptance and employee performance can predict job satisfaction. The results of this study confirm the indirect mediating function of job satisfaction in the relationship between technology acceptance and employee performance. Conclusion: The Municipal Government of Ternate must improve system information management and offer even better facilitating conditions for implementation to increase the acceptance of the technology.

Keywords

transformational leadership quality of system enabling conditions technology acceptance performance
W. Jabid, A., Syahdan, R., Fahri, J., & Buamonabot, I. (2023). The Role of Receiving Technology on Employee Performance: Job Satisfaction as Mediation . Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 38(3), 229 -. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v38i3.5361
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Abdirahman, H. I. H., Najeemdeen, I. S., Abidemi, B. T., & Ahmad, R. (2020). The relationship between job satisfaction, work-life balance and organizational commitment on employee performance. Advances in Business Research International Journal, 4(1), 42–52. Retrieved from: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=696047
  2. Adi, M. P. H., & Sukmawati, A. (2020). The effect of levers of control and leadership style on creativity. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business: JIEB, 35(3), 236–256. Retrieved from 10.22146/jieb.55466
  3. Aggelidis, V. P., & Chatzoglou, P. D. (2009). Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(2), 115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.006
  4. Ahearne, M., Jones, E., Rapp, A., & Mathieu, J. (2008). High touch through high tech: The impact of salesperson technology usage on sales performance via mediating mecha¬nisms. Management Science, 54(4), 671–685. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0783
  5. Ahmad, R., & Saad, M. (2020). The impact of Malaysian public sector in the relationship between transformational leadership styles and career development. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(3), 203–212. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1627555
  6. Ahn, T., Ryu, S., & Han, I. (2007). The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Information and Management, 44(3), 263–275. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2006.12.008
  7. Ahyaruddin, M., & Akbar, R. (2016). The relationship between the use of a perfor-mance measurement system, organizational factors, accountability, and the performance of public sector organi-zations. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 31(1), 1–22. doi: 10.22146/jieb.10317
  8. Akter, S., Ambra, J. D., & Ray, P. (2011). Trustworthiness in mHealth information services : An assessment of a hierarchical model with mediating and moderating effects using partial least squares ( PLS ). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 100–116. doi: 10.1002/asi.21442
  9. Alameri, F., & Alrajawy, I. (2020). Mediating effect of organizational citizenship beha-viour on relationship between transforma-tional leadership and employees perfor-mance: Role of green engineering. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/ Egyptology, 17(7), 6243–6257. Retrieved from: https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/2962
  10. Ali, B. M., & Younes, B. (2013). The impact of information systems on user performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 3(2), 128–154.
  11. Alkhwaldi, A. F., & Al Eshoush, A. S. (2022). Towards a model for citizens’ acceptance of e-payment systems for public sector services in Jordan: Evidence from crisis era. Information Sciences Letters, 11(3), 657–663.
  12. Almohtaseb, A., Almahameed, M., Sharari, F., & Dabbouri, E. (2021). The effect of transformation leadership on government employee job satisfaction during Covid-19. Management Science Letters, 11(4), 1231–1244. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2020.11.015
  13. Alqudah, H., Al Natour, A. R., Al-Kofahi, M., Rahman, M. S. A., Abutaber, T. A., & Al-Okaily, M. (2022). Determinants of the cashless payment systems acceptance in developing Countries: Evidence from Jordanian public sector employees. Artifi-cial Intelligence for Sustainable Finance and Sustainable Technology (ICGER), 593–601. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-93464-4_58
  14. Alshamaila, Y., Papagiannidis, S., & Li, F. (2013). Cloud computing adoption by SMEs in the north east of England: A multi-perspective framework. Journal of Enter¬prise Information Management, 26(3), 250–275. doi: 10.1108/17410391311325225
  15. Alshibly, H. (2014). An Empirical Investigation into Factors Influencing the Intention to Use E-learning System: An Extended Techno¬logy Acceptance Model. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 4(17), 2440–2457. doi: 10.9734/bjast/2014/10033
  16. Alsuwaidi, M., Alshurideh, M., Al Kurdi, B., & Salloum, S. A. (2021). Performance apprai¬sal on employees’ motivation: A compre¬hensive analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2020, 681–693. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58669-0_61
  17. Ambrose, P., & Eynon, J. (1998). A Theoretical Model for Software Quality Management. AMCIS 1998 Proceedings., 288. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis1998/288
  18. Apridiyanti, A., Suharman, H., & Ardianto, Z. (2020). Successful Implementation of Information Systems in Public Sector Organizations. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 3(1), 40–51.
  19. Arokiasamy, A. R. A., Abdullah, A. G. K. bin, & Ismail, A. B. (2014). Correlation between cultural perceptions, leadership style and ICT usage by school principals in Malaysia. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), 27–40. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.478
  20. As’ad, M. (2004). Psikologi Industri: Seri Ilmu Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Liberty Yogyakarta.
  21. Attar, G. A., & Sweis, R. J. (2010). The relationship between information techno-logy adoption and job satisfaction in contracting companies in Jordan. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 15, 44–63. Retrieved from: https://www.itcon.org/2010/3
  22. Bak, H., Jin, M. H., & McDonald III, B. D. (2022). Unpacking the transformational leadership-innovative work behavior relationship: The mediating role of psychological capital. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(1), 80–105. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2021.1939737
  23. Barakat, L. L., Lorenz, M. P., Ramsey, J. R., & Cretoiu, S. L. (2015). Global managers: An analysis of the impact of cultural intelli¬gence on job satisfaction and performance. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(4), 781–800. doi: 10.1108/IJoEM-01-2014-0011
  24. Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Perso¬nality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  25. Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2019). Research Methods For Business : A Skill Building Approach (8th ed.). Hoboken, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Cheng, Y. M. (2012). Effects of quality ante-cedents on e-learning acceptance. Internet Research, 22(3), 361–390. doi: 10.1108/10662241211235699
  27. Cheng, Y. M. (2019). A hybrid model for exploring the antecedents of cloud ERP continuance: Roles of quality determinants and task-technology fit. International Jour¬nal of Web Information Systems, 15(2), 215–235. doi: 10.1108/IJWIS-07-2018-0056
  28. Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications.
  29. Cho, J., Park, I., & Michel, J. W. (2011). How does leadership affect information systems success? the role of transformational leadership. Information and Management, 48(7), 270–277. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2011.07.003
  30. Dalal, R. S., & Credé, M. (2013). Job satisfaction and other job attitudes. In APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1: Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organi¬zational psychology. (pp. 675–691). doi: 10.1037/14047-037
  31. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. doi: 10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  32. Elkhani, N., Soltani, S., & Ahmad, M. N. (2014). The effects of transformational leadership and ERP system self-efficacy on ERP system usage. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(6), 759–785. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-06-2013-0031
  33. Fahri, J., Alting, H., Syahdan, R., Asril Arilaha, M., & Buamonabot, I. (2021). Paternalistic Leadership, Perceived Organizational Poli¬tics, and Job Satisfaction: Mediation and Moderation Model. The 11th International Conference on Information Communication and Management, 52–58. doi: 10.1145/3484399.3484407
  34. Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Examine Faculty Use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) In Higher Education Institutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 210–232.
  35. Felício, T., Samagaio, A., & Rodrigues, R. (2021). Adoption of management control systems and performance in public sector organizations. Journal of Business Research, 124, 593–602. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.069
  36. Fu, J. R., Farn, C. K., & Chao, W. P. (2006). Acceptance of electronic tax filing: A study of taxpayer intentions. Information and Management, 43(1), 109–126. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2005.04.001
  37. Fu, W., & Deshpande, S. P. (2014). The Impact of Caring Climate, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment on Job Performance of Employees in a China’s Insurance Company. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 339–349. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1876-y
  38. Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. doi: 10.2307/249689
  39. Gu, J. C., Lee, S. C., & Suh, Y. H. (2009). Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11605–11616. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.024
  40. Gu, Z., & Siu, R. C. Sen. (2009). Drivers of job satisfaction as related to work performance in Macao casino hotels: An investigation based on employee survey. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Mana¬gement, 21(5), 561–578. doi: 10.1108/09596110910967809
  41. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Pearson.
  42. Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
  43. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  44. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling ( PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. 26 (2)(September), 106–121. doi: 10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  45. Handayani, E., Pandansari, T., Aji, M., Wahyuni, S., & Hapsari, I. (2022). Support for Transformational Leadership through Fairness and Accountability in the Imple¬mentation of Performance-Based Budgeting for Indonesian Private Universities. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Business, Accounting, and Economics (ICBAE), 1–7. doi: 10.4108/eai.10-8-2022.2320924
  46. Hawash, B., Mokhtar, U. A., & Yusof, Z. M. (2021). Users’ acceptance of an electronic record management system in the context of the oil and gas sector in Yemen: an application of ISSM-TAM. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 20(1), 75–98. doi: 10.1504/IJMED.2021.113661
  47. Hayati, K., & Caniago, I. (2012). Islamic Work Ethic: The Role of Intrinsic Motivation, Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Job Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 1102–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.148
  48. Hendri, M. I. (2019). The mediation effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on the organizational learning effect of the employee performance. International Jour¬nal of Productivity and Performance Mana-gement, 68(7), 1208–1234. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2018-0174
  49. Ho, A. T. (2002). Reinventing Local Govern-ments and the E‐Government Initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00197
  50. Holbert, J., Madhakomala, R., Saparuddin, S., & Timotius, E. (2021). The influence of leadership styles on employees’ job satisfaction in public sector organizations in Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 11(4), 1393–1398. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2020.10.035
  51. Houger, V. P. (2006). Trends of employee performance. Collaborative effort between managers and employees. Performance Improvement, 45(5), 26–31.
  52. Hoxha, A. (2015). Empowerment and trust as mediators of the relationship between transformational leadership and organiza-tional effectiveness. European Journal of Economic & Political Studies, 8(1), 43–60.
  53. Huang, W.-R. (2019). Job Training Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance. In Career Development and Job Satisfaction. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.89117
  54. Husin, M. H., Loghmani, N., & Abidin, S. S. Z. (2017). Increasing e-government adoption in Malaysia: MyEG case study. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 19(3/4), 202–227. doi: 10.1108/JSIT-01-2017-0007
  55. Huy, P. Q., & Phuc, V. K. (2020). The impact of public sector scorecard adoption on the effectiveness of accounting information systems towards the sustainable perfor¬mance in public sector. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1717718
  56. Indrayani, E., & Gatiningsih. (2013). Sistem Informasi Manajemen (SIM) Pemerintahan Konsep dan Aplikasinya pada Organisasi Pemerintahan/Pemda. IPDN Pres.
  57. Ingsih, K., Prayitno, A., Waluyo, D. E., & Suhana, S. (2020). Mediating roles of job satisfaction toward the organizational commitment of employees in the public sector. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 999–1006. doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.999
  58. Islam, A. K. M. (2012). The role of perceived system quality as educators’ motivation to continue e-learning system use. AIS Tran-sactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(1), 25–43. Retrieved from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/thci/vol4/iss1/2
  59. Kalkavan, S., & Katrinli, A. (2014). The Effects of Managerial Coaching Behaviors on the Employees’ Perception of Job Satisfaction, Organisational Commitment, and Job Performance: Case Study on Insurance Industry in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 1137–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.129
  60. Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2008). Organizational culture and leadership in ERP implemen-tation. Decision Support Systems, 45(2), 208–218. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.02.002
  61. Kelerey, B., Djatmika, E. T., & Siswanto, E. (2020). The Effect of Technology Accep-tance Model and Organizational Culture To the Employee Performance and Attitude As Mediator Variable (a Study At Academik and Library Employee in Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia). Economics and Law, 21(5), 10–20.
  62. Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2008.09.002
  63. Kim, T. G., Lee, J. H., & Law, R. (2008). An empirical examination of the acceptance behaviour of hotel front office systems: An extended technology acceptance model. Tourism Management, 29(3), 500–513. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.016
  64. Kock, N., & Moqbel, M. (2021). Social networking site use, positive emotions, and job performance. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 6(12), 163–173. doi: 10.1080/08874417.2019.1571457
  65. Koral Gümüsoglu, E., & Akay, E. (2017). Measuring Technology Acceptance Level of Teachers by Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Inter¬national Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 5(4), 378–394. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581330
  66. Korejan, M. M., & Shahbazi, H. (2016). An analysis of the transformational leadership theory. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 8(3), 452–461. doi: 10.4314/jfas.v8i3s.192
  67. Kurniawan, D. T., Kusnayain, Y. I., Aulisaina, F. I., & Hakim, M. A. R. (2021). Exploring the Existence of Innovative Work Behavior among Government Employee: Have Been There? Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 36(3), 272–282. doi: 10.22146/jieb.v36i3.1404
  68. Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Trunk, N. (2010). Do as your parents say?—Analyzing IT adoption influencing factors for full and under age applicants. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(2), 169–183. doi: 10.1007/s10796-008-9136-x
  69. Lebas, M. J. (1995). Performance measurement and performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 41(1–3), 23–35. doi: 10.1016/0925-5273(95)00081-X
  70. Lee, S. M., Kim, Y. R., & Lee, J. (1995). An empirical study of the relationships among end-user information systems acceptance, training, and effectiveness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 189–202. doi: 10.1080/07421222.1995.11518086
  71. Lucas Jr, H. C., & Spitler, V. K. (1999). Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences, 30(2), 291–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01611.x
  72. Luk, S. C. Y. (2009). The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong. Government Information Quarterly, 26(4), 594–604. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.02.009
  73. Luthans, F. (2012). Organizational behavior an evidence-based approach 12th edition. In Organizational behavior: an edivence-based approach.
  74. Maharani, V., Troena, E. A., & Noermijati, N. (2013). Organizational Citizenship Behavior Role in Mediating the Effect of Transfor¬mational Leadership, Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance: Studies in PT Bank Syariah Mandiri Malang East Java. Interna¬tional Journal of Business and Manage¬ment, 8(17), 1–12. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v8n17p1
  75. Makin, P., Cooper, C., & Cox, C. (1996). Orga¬nisations and the Psychological Contract: Managing People at Work. Wiley-Blackwell.
  76. Mariani, M. G., Curcuruto, M., & Gaetani, I. (2013). Training opportunities, technology acceptance and job satisfaction: A study of Italian organizations. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25(7), 455–475. doi: 10.1108/JWL-12-2011-0071
  77. McFarland, D. J., & Hamilton, D. (2006). Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 427–447. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.009
  78. Miraz, M. H., Hasan, M. T., Rekabder, M. S., & Akhter, R. (2022). Trust, transaction transparency, volatility, facilitating condi-tion, performance expectancy towards cryptocurrency adoption through intention to use. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 25, 1–20.
  79. Mulugo, L., Kyazze, F. B., Kibwika, P., Kikulwe, E., Omondi, A. B., & Ajambo, S. (2020). Unravelling technology-acceptance factors influencing farmer use of banana tissue culture planting materials in Central Uganda. African Journal of Science, Tech¬nology, Innovation and Development, 12(4), 453–465. doi: 10.1080/20421338.2019.1634900
  80. Negoro, M. C. W., & Wibowo, A. (2021). Empathetic leadership, job satisfaction and intention to leave among millennials in a start-up industry: Needs’ satisfaction as a mediating variable. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 36(2), 136–154. doi: 10.22146/jieb.v36i2.1398
  81. Park, S., & Rainey, H. (2012). Work motivation and social communication among public managers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(13), 2630–2660. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.637060
  82. Park, Y., Son, H., & Kim, C. (2012). Inves-tigating the determinants of construction professionals’ acceptance of web-based training: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Automation in Construc¬tion, 22, 377–386. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.016
  83. Pawirosumarto, S., Sarjana, P. K., & Gunawan, R. (2017). The effect of work environment, leadership style, and organizational culture towards job satisfaction and its implication towards employee performance in Parador Hotels and Resorts, Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1337–1358. doi: 10.1108/IJLMA-10-2016-0085
  84. Plude, D. J., & Hoyer, W. J. (1986). Age and the selectivity of visual information processing. Psychology and Aging, 1(1), 4–10. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.1.1.4
  85. Prybutok, V. R., Zhang, X., & Ryan, S. D. (2008). Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment. Information and Management, 45(3), 143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2007.12.004
  86. Purnamasari, P., Amran, N. A., & Hartanto, R. (2022). Modelling computer assisted audit techniques (CAATs) in enhancing the Indonesian public sector. F1000Research 11, 11, 559. Retrieved from: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-559
  87. Qing, M., Asif, M., Hussain, A., & Jameel, A. (2020). Exploring the impact of ethical leadership on job satisfaction and organiza¬tional commitment in public sector organi¬zations: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science, 14, 1405–1432. doi: 10.1007/s11846-019-00340-9
  88. Qureshi, M. A., Thebo, J. A., ur Rehman, S., Shahbaz, M. S., & Sohu, S. (2020). The role hr analytics, performance pay and hr involvement in influencing job satisfaction and firm performance. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol, 29, 382–392.
  89. Rahi, S., Ghani, M., Alnaser, F., & Ngah, A. (2018). Investigating the role of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in internet banking adoption context. Management Science Letters, 8(3), 173–186. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2018.1.001
  90. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Organisational behaviour. 13th (ed) USA. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  91. Rothman, S., & Coetzer, E. P. (2002). The relationship between personality dimensions and job satisfaction. Management Dyna¬mics: Journal of the Southern African Institute for Management Scientists, 11(1), 29–42. doi: 10.10520/EJC69638
  92. Saba, T. (2012). Implications of E-learning systems and self-efficiency on students outcomes: a model approach. Human-Cen¬tric Computing and Information Sciences, 2(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1186/2192-1962-2-6
  93. Salameh, A. A. M., Ahmad, H., Zulhumadi, F., & Abubakar, F. M. (2018). Relationships between system quality, service quality, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 20(1), 73–102. doi: 10.1108/JSIT-03-2017-0016
  94. Saleem, F., Malik, M. I., Qureshi, S. S., Farid, M. F., & Qamar, S. (2021). Technostress and employee performance nexus during COVID-19: training and creative self-efficacy as moderators. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.595119
  95. Sambasivan, M., Wemyss, G. P., & Rose, R. C. (2010). User acceptance of a G2B system: A case of electronic procurement system in Malaysia. Internet Research, 20(2), 169–187. doi: 10.1108/10662241011032236
  96. Schepers, J., Wetzels, M., & Ruyter, K. de. (2005). Leadership styles in technology acceptance: Do followers practice what leaders preach? Managing Service Quality, 15(6), 496–508. doi: 10.1108/09604520510633998
  97. Shao, Z. (2019). Impact mechanism of direct supervisor’s leadership behaviors on employees’ extended use of information technologies. Journal of Enterprise Infor-mation Management, 32(4), 626–645. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-07-2018-0160
  98. Shao, Z., Feng, Y., & Hu, Q. (2016). Effec-tiveness of top management support in enterprise systems success: A contingency perspective of fit between leadership style and system life-cycle. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(2), 131–153. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2015.6
  99. Shao, Z., Feng, Y., & Hu, Q. (2017). Impact of top management leadership styles on ERP assimilation and the role of organizational learning. Information and Management, 54(7), 902–919. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2017.01.005
  100. SHRM. (2014). Employee Job Satisfaction and Engagement The Road to Economic Recovery. USA, CHINA, INDIA, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES.
  101. Smith, G., & Shirley, A. W. (1978). A review of the effects of trace concentrations of anaes¬thetics on performance. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 50(7), 701–712. doi: 10.1093/bja/50.7.701
  102. Stelter, A., Kaping, C., Oschinsky, F. M., & Niehaves, B. (2020). Theoretical founda-tions on technology acceptance and usage in public administrations: Investigating bound¬ed acceptance and usage of new technology by employees. The 21st Annual Interna¬tional Conference on Digital Government Research, 344–345. Retrieved from 10.1145/3396956.3397004
  103. Sutrisno, E. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Cetakan Ketiga. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  104. Tajuddin, R. A., Baharudin, M., & Hoon, T. S. (2013). System quality and its influence on students’ learning satisfaction in UiTM Shah Alam. Procedia - Social and Behavio¬ral Sciences, 90, 677–685. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.07.140
  105. Tenenhaus, M., Esposito, V., Chatelinc, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. 48, 159–205. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
  106. Teo, T. (2016). Modelling Facebook usage among university students in Thailand: The role of emotional attachment in an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 745–757. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.917110
  107. Teo, Timothy. (2010). Examining the influence of subjective norm and facilitating condi¬tions on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a structural equation modeling of an extended tech¬nology acceptance model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2), 253–262. doi: 10.1007/s12564-009-9066-4
  108. Thannimalai, R., & Raman, A. (2018). The influence of principals’ technology leader¬ship and professional development on teachers’ technology integration in secon¬dary schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 203–228. doi: 10.32890/mjli2018.15.1.8
  109. To, W.-M., Lee, P. K. C., & Lam, K.-H. (2018). Building professionals’ intention to use smart and sustainable building technologies – An empirical study. PloS One, 13(8), 1–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201625
  110. Tsai, P. C. F., Yen, Y. F., Huang, L. C., & Huang, I. C. (2007). A study on motivating employees’ learning commitment in the post-downsizing era: Job satisfaction pers¬pective. Journal of World Business, 42(2), 157–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2007.02.002
  111. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theo-retical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 169–332. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  112. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. doi: 10.2307/30036540
  113. Vijai, J. P. (2018). Examining the relationship between system quality, knowledge quality and user satisfaction in the success of knowledge management system: an empi¬rical study. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 9(3), 203–221.
  114. Wamba, S. F., & Bhattacharya, M. (2015). Determinants of perceived job satisfaction from ERP-enabled emergency service adoption: An empirical study. Twenty-First Americas Conference on Information Systems, 1–12.
  115. Wang, C., & Teo, T. S. (2020). Online service quality and perceived value in mobile government success: An empirical study of mobile police in China. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102076. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102076
  116. Wickramasinghe, V., & Wickramasekara, J. (2022). Putting Public Services into Enterprise System-Predicting Employees’ Acceptance of Transformational Govern-ment Technology in an Expanded Techno¬logy Acceptance Model. Public Organiza¬tion Review, 22(2), 345–365. doi: 10.1007/s11115-021-00528-2
  117. Wright, S. (1922). Coefficients of Inbreeding and Relationship. The American Naturalist, 56(645), 330–338. doi: 10.1086/279872
  118. Yamin, M. A. Y. (2020). Examining the effect of organisational innovation on employee creativity and firm performance: moderating role of knowledge sharing between employee creativity and employee perfor¬mance. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 22(3), 447–467. doi: 10.1504/IJBIR.2020.108009
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1142 Download : 1149