Ontological and Epistemological Implications of Black Hole Evaporation in Modern Physical Philosophy

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.108753

Reza Ariefka(1*), Taufik Roni Sahroni(2), Ruben Cornelius Siagian(3), Arip Nurahman(4), Abu Yazid Raisal(5)

(1) Physics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of OKU Timur, Indonesia
(2) Industrial Engineering Department, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia and Industrial Engineering Department, Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang, Jawa Barat 41361, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indoensian
(4) Department of Physics Education, Indonesian Institute of Education, Garut, Indonesia
(5) Physics Education Study Programme, University of Muhammadiyah North Sumatra, Jl. Kapten Mukhtar Basri No. 3, Medan 20238, North Sumatra, Indonesia.
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The research is motivated by developments in modern physics which show that black holes, which in classical general relativity are considered the most stable and permanent entities in the universe, actually undergo evaporation through Hawking radiation. This phenomenon has profound philosophical implications regarding the nature of physical existence, the status of information, the structure of space-time, and the direction of cosmological time. This research aims to analyse the ontological and epistemological implications of black hole evaporation in the context of micro-macro relationships, relational ontology, and the concept of time as a phenomenon that emerges from fundamental physical processes. This study employs a qualitative research method based on literature review and conceptual analysis, integrating perspectives from theoretical physics, philosophy of physics, and modern cosmology. The findings indicate that black hole evaporation confirms that there are no physical entities that are absolute and permanent. Physical existence is more accurately understood as a relational phenomenon that depends on the interaction between the geometry of space-time, quantum fluctuations, and cosmic thermodynamic processes. In addition, the black hole information paradox can be understood as a limitation of human epistemological description, not as an ontological loss of physical reality. This research also confirms that the direction of time is an emergent consequence of the increase in the entropy of the universe. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of the phenomenon of black hole evaporation with a structural-relational ontological approach to explain physical reality as a dynamic and emergent process.



Keywords


Black Hole Evaporation; Hawking Radiation; Relational Ontology; Information Paradox; Thermodynamic Arrow of Time

Full Text:

PDF


References

Allori, V. (2013). Primitive ontology and the structure of fundamental physical theories. In A. Ney & D. Z. Albert (Eds.), The wave function: Essays on the metaphysics of quantum mechanics (pp. 58–75). Oxford University Press.

Alzerkany, A. (2025). Black Holes: A Comprehensive Review. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5360921

Ashtekar, A. (2000). Classical quantum physics of isolated horizons: A brief overview. In J. Kowalski-Glikman (Ed.), Lectures notes in physics (Vol. 541, pp. 50–70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46634-7_2

Ashtekar, A., & Bojowald, M. (2005). Black hole evaporation: A paradigm. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 22(16), 3349-3362. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/22/16/014

Avchenko, O., & Chudnenko, K. (2020). Entropy and the evolution of the Universe. The Complex Systems, 4(10), 31–37. https://scinetwork.ru/articles/111

Basilakos, S., Kouniatalis, G., Saridakis, E. N., & Tzerefos, C. (2025). Bohmian quantum cosmology from the Wheeler-DeWitt equation.arXiv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140339

Bekenstein, J. D. (1973). Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D, 7(8), 2333. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

Bekenstein, J. D. (2003). Information in the holographic universe. Scientific American, 289(2), 58–65.

Ben-Naim, A. (2022). Information, entropy, life, and the universe. Entropy, 24(11), 1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24111636

Bitbol, M. (2024). Relations and relativities: A Kantian approach to relational interpretations of quantum theory. La Cultura. Rivista di filosofia e filologia, 62(3), 409–434. https://hal.science/hal-04853102v1

Bittner, T. (2018). Formal ontology of space, time, and physical entities in classical mechanics. Applied Ontology, 13(2), 135–179. https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-180195

Boi, L. (2022). Topological quantum field theory and the emergence of physical space–time from geometry: New insights into the interactions between geometry and physics. In S. Wuppuluri & I. Stewart (Eds.), From electrons to elephants and elections: Exploring the role of content and context (pp. 403–423). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92192-7_20

Builes Canchala, J. L. (2025). Quantum field theory on curved spacetime and black holes (Other thesis). Antioquia University. https://inspirehep.net/authors/2944316

Buonocore, G. (2017). Substance-relation identity and causal relationality: Suggestions from the philosophy of physics. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 2050, JOWO2017, EPINON). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2050

Carriero, J. P. (1995). On the relationship between mode and substance in Spinoza’s metaphysics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33(2), 245–273. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.1995.0026

Carroll, S. M. (2022). The quantum field theory on which the everyday world supervenes. In Levels of Reality in Science and Philosophy: Re-Examining the Multi-Level Structure of Reality (pp. 27–46). Springer.

Chambert-Loir, A. (2023). Information theory: Three theorems by Claude Shannon. Springer Nature.

Cheek, A., Heurtier, L., Perez-Gonzalez, Y. F., & Turner, J. (2022). Primordial black hole evaporation and dark matter production. I. Solely Hawking radiation. Physical Review D, 105(1), 015022. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.015022

Choquet-Bruhat, Y. (2023). Introduction to general relativity, black holes and cosmology. Oxford University Press.

Quni-Gudzinas, R. B. (2025). A theory of general mechanics as a process-based, computational ontology of reality (Version 1.2) [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16885888

Dribus, B. F. (2017). Discrete causal theory. Springer.

Drossel, B. (2020). What condensed matter physics and statistical physics teach us about the limits of unitary time evolution. Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations, 7, 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-019-00208-3

Evangelidis, B. (2018). Space and time as relations: The theoretical approach of Leibniz. Philosophies, 3(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies3020009

Favalli, T. (2025). On the emergence of time and space in closed quantum systems. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.08120

Ferrari, F. M. (2021). Process-based entities are relational structures. From Whitehead to structuralism. Manuscrito, 44(1), 149–207. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2021.V44N1.FF

Floridi, L. (2002). On defining library and information science as applied philosophy of information. Social Epistemology, 16(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720210132789

Furlan, S. (2024). Uprooting the Tree of Physics: John Wheeler between Black Holes and’It from Bit’. Max Planck Institut. https://doi.org/10.13097/archive-ouverte/unige:178707

Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1985). A model for a unified quantum description of macroscopic and microscopic systems. In L. Accardi & W. von Waldenfels (Eds.), Quantum probability and applications II (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1136, pp. 223–232). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0074474

Giddings, S. B. (1995). The black hole information paradox.arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9508151

Hawking, S. W. (1976). Black holes and thermodynamics. Physical Review D, 13(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.13.191

Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. F. (2023). The large scale structure of space-time: 50 anniversary edition. Cambridge university press.

Helfer, A. D. (2003). Do black holes radiate? Reports on Progress in Physics, 66(6), 943. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0034-4885/66/6/202

Henry, M. (2021). Thermodynamics of life. Substantia, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.36253/Substantia-959

Kakade, V. (2024). From Black Holes to the Big Bang: How General Relativity Transformed Our Understanding of the Cosmos. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4894384

Kuhlmann, M. (2006). Quantum field theory. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2006 Edition). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/quantum-field-theory/

Luo, M. (2025). Quantum mechanics relative to a quantum reference system: A relative state approach. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/html/2510.17513v1

Mallick, S., De, U. C., & Suh, Y. J. (2020). Spacetimes with different forms of energy–momentum tensor. Journal of Geometry and Physics, 151, 103622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2020.103622

Nagashima, Y. (2011). Elementary Particle Physics: Quantum Field Theory and Particles V1 (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.

Neukart, F., Brasher, R., & Marx, E. (2024). The Quantum Memory Matrix: A Unified Framework for the Black Hole Information Paradox. Entropy, 26(12), 1039. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26121039

Oh, J.-Y. (2024). Understanding the various scientific theories in the history of science. Indian J Hist. Sci.59, 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-024-00135-2

Owino, B. (2025). Against Spacetime Substance: A Relational Interpretation of General Relativity. PhilSci Archive. https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/27279/

Padmanabhan, T. (2005). Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons. Physics Reports, 406(2), 49–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.003

Parker, E. (2025). Unitary time evolution in quantum mechanics is a stronger physical postulate than linear time evolution. Foundations of Physics, 55(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-024-00818-x

Pauri, M. (1997). The quantum, space–time and observability. In E. Agazzi (Ed.), Realism and quantum physics (Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Vol. 55, pp. 175–195). Rodopi.

Prabakaran, M. (2024). History, and Relational Dynamics: A Philosophical Analysis.SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5065395

Preskill, J. (1992). Do black holes destroy information. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9209058

Price, H. (1996). Time’s arrow & Archimedes’ point: New directions for the physics of time. Oxford University Press.

Rovelli, C. (2003). Loop quantum gravity. Physics World, 16(11), 37-41. https://academics.hamilton.edu/physics/smajor/Papers/rovelli03.pdf

Rovelli, C. (2021). The relational interpretation of quantum physics. arXiv.. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.09170

Scaltsas, T. (1994). Substances and universals in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Cornell University Press.

Scano, P. S. (2024). Space and time, do we describe them correctly? On the 4-dimensional structure of the universe. Cambridge Open Engage. https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2024-203js

Schmitt, L. (2023). Operational causality and realizable processes in the Page-Wootters framework. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000722642

Schwinger, J. (1960). Unitary operator bases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 46(4), 570–579. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.46.4.570

Sheykhi, A. (2021). Barrow entropy corrections to Friedmann equations. Physical Review D, 103(12), 123503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123503

Singh, K. (2024). The nature of reality: Exploring ontology and metaphysical perspectives. International Journal of Social Science Research (IJSSR), 1(4), 17–27. https://www.ijssr.com/papers/volume-1/issue-4/ijssr25226/

Syifa, A., APP, E. L. C., Putri, A. A., & Pratama, M. A. (2024). Hubungan Panta Rhei Dan Keadilan Dalam Pemikiran Heraclitus. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 1(02). https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/praxis/article/view/612

Touchette, H. (2015). Equivalence and nonequivalence of ensembles: Thermodynamic, macrostate, and measure levels. Journal of Statistical Physics, 159(5), 987–1016. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1403.6608

Traschen, J. (2000). An introduction to black hole evaporation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.gr-qc/0010055

Volovik, G. E. (2024). Thermodynamics and decay of de Sitter vacuum. Symmetry, 16(6), 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16060763

Wald, R. M. (2010). General relativity. University of Chicago press.

Wallace, D. (2024). Quantum systems other than the Universe. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.13058

Wheeler, J. A. (2018). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. Feynman and Computation, 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429500459-19

Zanstra, H. (1968). Thermodynamics, statistical mechanics and the universe. Vistas in Astronomy, 10, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0083-6656(68)90038-X

Zivieri, R. (2023). Trends in the second law of thermodynamics. Entropy, 25(9), 1321.https://doi.org/10.3390/e25091321

Znojil, M. (2022). Wheeler-DeWitt equation and the applicability of crypto-Hermitian interaction representation in quantum cosmology. Universe, 8(7), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8070385




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.108753

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2164 | views : 672

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Filsafat