The Configurative Role of Emptiness in Hylectic Consciousness: A Phenomenological Investigation

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.112716

Amar Yanuar Pamungkas(1*)

(1) School of Buddhist Studies, Philosophy and Comparative Religions, Nalanda University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Husserl’s Ideas I distinguishes a noetic approach from a hyletic (material) one, yet his emphasis on the former leaves the latter conceptually underdeveloped. This underdevelopment fuels familiar objections: the enigmatic status of non-intentional “data,” worries about immanentism and idealist drift, and suspicions that correlationism licenses a tacit humanism. I offer a critical reconstruction of the hyletic dimension that preserves Husserl’s texts while clarifying its role in phenomenological analysis. Methodologically, I conjoin a conceptual analysis of hyletic and noetic moments with a phenomenological account of their correlation in givenness (Gegebenheit). The claim is that hyletic content, through distinctive modes of “emptiness,” functions configuratively, structuring intentional experience rather than simply stocking it with data. On this view, the hyletic is not brute sensory matter but a condition for what I call epistemic reversibility within consciousness: the capacity of experience to reconfigure its own evidential bearings by way of hyletic modulation. This reinterpretation addresses the standard critiques and repositions hyletics as an internally normative moment of Husserlian phenomenology.



Keywords


Husserl; hyletic data; noesis; intentionality; phenomenology.



References

Aristotle. (1947). Metaphysics, Books I–IX (H. Tredennick, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published c. 350 BCE)

Bello, A. A. (2015). The sense of things. A reflection starting from Husserl. Archivio Di Filosofia, 83(3), 15–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26572114

Brisson, L., & Ofman, S. (2021). The khôra and the two-triangle universe of Plato's Timaeus. Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 54(4), 493–518. https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2020-0064.

Charles, D. (2023). An introduction to the history of hylomorphism. In D. Charles (Ed.), The history of hylomorphism: From Aristotle to Descartes. Oxford University Press.

Erwin, J. L. (2024). The ontology of nature: An examination of Husserl’s ontology of nature in Ideas I and The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (Publication No. 3054277879) [Master's thesis, Catholic University of America]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Gusman, S. (2017). To the nothingnesses themselves: Husserl’s influence on Sartre’s notion of nothingness. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 49(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2017.1387687

Hui, K. (2022). The hyle of imagination and reproductive consciousness: Husserl’s phenomenology of phantasy reconsidered. Husserl Studies, 38, 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-022-09308-2

Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1936)

Husserl, E. (1973). Experience and judgment: Investigations in a genealogy of logic (J. S. Churchill & K. Ameriks, Trans.; L. Landgrebe, Ed.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1939)

Husserl, E. (1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology (F. Kersten, Trans.). Springer. (Original work published 1913)

Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Springer. (Original work published 1952)

Husserl, E. (1997). Thing and space: Lectures of 1907 (R. Rojcewicz, Trans.).Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Original work published 1973)

Husserl, E. (2001). Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic (A. J. Steinbock, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Original work published 1966).

Inwood, B. (2001). The poem of Empedocles: A text and translation with an introduction (Vol. 3). University of Toronto Press.

Leinkauf, T. (2011). Giordano Brunos Schrift “De La Causa, Principio Et Uno” Und Schellings Dialog “Bruno.” Bruniana & Campanelliana, 17(1), 11–25. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24337584

Lusthaus, D. (2002). Buddhist phenomenology: A philosophical investigation of Yogacara Buddhism and the Ch'eng Wei-shih Lun (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870687

Plato. (2008). Timaeus and Critias (D. Lee, Trans.). Penguin Classics. (Original work published c. 360 BCE)

Rabanaque, L.R. (2003). Hyle, Genesis and Noema. Husserl Studies, 19, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027305819572

Reid, J. (2012). The metaphysics of Henry More. Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3988-8

Soueltzis, N. (2023). Kinaesthesis revisited: Kinaesthetic sensation and its temporal asymmetry. JBSP. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 54(1), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2022.2142803

Whitehead, P. (2015). Phenomenology without correlationism: Husserl's hyletic material. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 15(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/20797222.2015.1101830

Williford, K. (2013). Husserl’s hyletic data and phenomenal consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 12(3), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9297-z



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.112716

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Filsafat