Camusian Rebellion and the Ethical Limits of Posthumanism

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.97438

Chrisoneiro Yoshua Sidabutar(1*)

(1) Universitas Kristen Indonesia Tomohon
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article examines how Albert Camus’s concepts of absurdity and rebellion can serve as an ethical framework in responding to posthumanist ideologies that challenge human subjectivity and autonomy. The research objective is to critically analyze the relevance of Camus’s existential philosophy in addressing the ethical dilemmas posed by posthumanism, particularly regarding technological transcendence and the erosion of human finitude. Adopting a normative-philosophical approach with textual analysis, the study investigates whether Camus’s notion of authentic rebellion offers a critical stance against posthumanist aspirations. The findings reveal that Camus’s idea of rebellion, grounded in justice, limits, and dignity, provides a strong ethical response to the dehumanizing effects of posthumanism. The study concludes that Camusian ethics affirms human responsibility and offers resistance to metaphysical escapism in hyper-technological contexts.



Keywords


absurdity, rebellion, posthumanism, ethics, Camus



References

Aronson, R. (2005). Camus and Sartre: The story of a friendship and the quarrel. University of Chicago Press.

Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology.

Boisvert, R. D. (2023). Albert Camus and the philosophy of the ordinary. Bloomsbury Academic.

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.

Camus, A. (1955). The myth of Sisyphus (J. O’Brien, Trans.). Alfred A. Knopf.

Camus, A. (1956). The rebel (A. Bower, Trans.). Vintage Books.

Daigle, C., & Hayler, M. (2023). Posthumanism in practice. Bloomsbury Academic.

Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical posthumanism. Bloomsbury Academic.

Foley, J. (2008). Albert Camus: From the absurd to revolt. Acumen.

Frangoul, H., Altshuler, D., Cappellini, M. D., Chen, Y.-S., Domm, J., Eustace, B. K., Foell, J., de la Fuente, J., Grupp, S., Handgretinger, R., Ho, T. W., Kattamis, A., Kernytsky, A., Kuhn, M., Lekstrom-Himes, J., Li, A. M., Locatelli, F., Mapara, M. Y., de Montalembert, M., … Corbacioglu, S. (2021). CRISPR–Cas9 gene editing for sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 384, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2031054

Francev, P., & Kałuża, M. (Eds.). (2023). Coming back to the absurd: Albert Camus’s The myth of Sisyphus 80 years on. Brill.

Herbrechter, S. (2021). Before humanity: Posthumanism and ancestrality. Brill.

Jorion, P. (2022). Humanism and its discontents: The rise of transhumanism and posthumanism. Springer.

Kurzweil, R. (2007). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Penguin.

McKinney, S. M., Sieniek, M., Godbole, V., Godwin, J., Antropova, N., Ashrafian, H., Back, T., Chesus, M., Corrado, G. S., Darzi, A., Etemadi, M., Garcia-Vicente, F., Gilbert, F. J., Halling-Brown, M. D., Hassabis, D., Jansen, S., Karthikesalingam, A., Kelly, C. J., King, D., … Shetty, S. (2020). International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature, 577, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6

McMillan, C. T. F. (2021). Posthumanism in digital culture. Emerald.

Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.

Sprintzen, D. A. (1991). Camus: A critical examination. Temple University Press.

Tomašovičová, J., & Suwara, B. (Eds.). (2023). Transhumanism and posthumanism in the perspective of Central and Eastern Europe. Peter Lang.

Todd, O. (1998). Albert Camus: A life. Vintage.

Topol, E. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7

Zaretsky, R. (2013). A life worth living: Albert Camus and the quest for meaning. Harvard University Press.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.97438

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 198

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Filsafat

Jurnal Filsafat Indexed by:

Google ScholarSinta (Science and Technology Index)


Jurnal Filsafat ISSN 0853-1870 (print), ISSN 2528-6811 (online)