Modeling How the Leader Power Affecting Performances of the Smallholder Beef Farming

https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i1.28307

Novie Andri Setianto(1*), Nunung Noor Hidayat(2), Pambudi Yuwono(3)

(1) Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, 53123, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, 53123, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, 53123, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aimed to explore how the leader power is affecting the performance of beef farmer group. The research was undertaken in two farmers group in Kabupaten Banjarnegara, Central Java Province involving 35 farmers and two beef traders. Systems thinking the approach was chosen about its capability to capture the complexity of the beef farming systems. A combination of semi-structured interviews, in-depth interviews, and workshop have been conducted to finalize this study. The discussion were focused on three aspects; (1) daily activities; (2) resources used and affected by those activities; and (3) pressures that are directly affected the resources and activities. The result was presented in a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) which generated using Vensim® software. The CLD showed that leader power affects the group performance in two reinforcing loops. Firstly, leader power positively linked to the decision for allocating profit to group reinvestment. Secondly, for allocating proportion for breeding. Farmer’s actual income become the leverage of the power dimension. Income will enforce the power thus makes the loop virtuous, whereas a loss will reduce power and makes the power loop vicious.

 


Keywords


Beef farming; Causal Loop Diagram; Farmer group; Qualitative modelling; Smallholder

Full Text:

PDF


References

Barham, J. and C. Chitemi. 2009. Collective action initiatives to improve marketing performance: Lessons from farmer groups in Tanzania. Food Policy, 34, 53-59.

Boediyana, T. 2007. Kesiapan dan Peran Asosiasi Industri Ternak Menuju Swasembada Daging Sapi 2010 (Roles of Livestock Industries Association to Support National Beef Self Sufficiency Program 2010). Seminar Nasional Hari Pangan Sedunia 2007 (World Food Day National Seminar 2007). Bogor - Indonesia.

Bosch, O. J. H., C. A. King, J. L. Herbohn, I. W. Russell and C. S. Smith. 2007. Getting the big picture in natural resource management—systems thinking as ‘method’ for scientists, policy makers, and other stakeholders. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 24, 217-232.

Boykin, C. C., H. C. Gilliam, R. A. Gustafson, and S. United. 1980. Structural characteristics of beef cattle raising in the United States, [Washington], Dept. of Agriculture, Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service: for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off.

Burke, C. S., D. E. Sims, E. H. Lazzara, and E. Salas. 2007. Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 606-632.

Cabrera, D., L. Colosi and C. Lobdell. 2008. Systems thinking. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31, 299-310.

Directorate General for Livestock and Veterinary Services. 2017. Livestock and Animal Health Statistics 2016, Jakarta, Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan, Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.

Flood, R. L. 2010. The Relationship of ‘Systems Thinking’ to Action Research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23, 269-284.

Huyen, L. T. T., P. Herold and A. Valle Zárate. 2010. Farm types for beef production and their economic success in a mountainous province of northern Vietnam. Agricultural Systems, 103, 137-145.

Kotlyar, I., L. Karakowsky and P. Ng. 2011. Leader behaviors, conflict and member commitment to team-generated decisions. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 666-679.

Maani, K. E. and V. Maharaj. 2004. Links between systems thinking and complex decision making. System Dynamics Review, 20, 21-48.

Maani, K. and R. Cavana. 2007. System thinking, system dynamics; managing change and complexity, Rosedale New Zealand, Pearson education.

Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia. 2010. Blue print program swasembada daging sapi 2014 (blueprint of national beef self-sufficiency program 2014), Jakarta, Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia.

Olivier de Sardan, J. P. 2005. Anthropology and Development,Understanding Contemporary Social Change, London and New York, ZED Books.

Overton, J. 2011. Smallholders [Online]. SAGE Publications.http://sage-ereference.com/view/environment/n990.xml Accessed 15 November 2011.

Peterson, R. S. and K. J. Behfar. 2003. The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 102-112.

Schaffernicht, M. 2006. Detecting and monitoring change in models. System Dynamics Review, 22, 73-88.

Schaffernicht, M. 2010. Causal loop diagrams between structure and behaviour: A critical analysis of the relationship between polarity, behaviour and events. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 27: 653-666.

Senge, P. M. 1992. The fifth Discipline; the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Milsons point, New South Wales Australia, Random House Australia.

Setianto, N. A., D. Cameron, and J. B. Gaughan. 2014a. Identifying archetypes of an enhanced system dynamics Causal Loop Diagram in Pursuit of strategies to improve smallholder beef farming in Java, Indonesia. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 31: 642-654.

Setianto, N. A., D. Cameron, and J. B. Gaughan. 2014b. Structuring the problematic situation of smallholder beef farming in Central Java, Indonesia: using systems thinking as an entry point to taming complexity. Int. J. Agricult. Management 3: 164-174.

Setianto, N. A. 2016. Kajian kualitatif dampak bantuan pemerintah pada peternakan sapi potong menggunakan pendekatan model. Agripet 16: 114-120.

Sherwood, D. 2002. Seeing the Forest for the Trees; A Manager's Guide to Applying Systems Thinking, London, Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Siegmund-Schultze, M., B. Rischkowsky, J. B. Da Veiga, and J. M. King. 2007. Cattle are cash generating assets for mixed smallholder farms in the Eastern Amazon. Agricultural Systems, 94: 738-749.

Sterman, J. D. 2000. Business Dynamics: System Thinking and Modelling for A Complex World, New York, Irwin McGraw-Hill.

Stroebel, A., F. J. C. Swanepoel, N. D. Nthakheni, A. E. Nesamvuni, and G. Taylor. 2008. Benefits obtained from cattle by smallholder farmers: a case study of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Australian J. Experimental Agric. 48: 825-828.

Ulrich, W. and M. Reynolds. 2010. Critical systems Heuristics. In: Systems Approaches to Managing Change. Reynolds, M. and S. Holwell (Eds.). A Practical Guide, Springer London.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i1.28307

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 585 | views : 485

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Buletin Peternakan (Bulletin of Animal Science) Indexed by:

 Harvard Library
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.