Gamma Radiation Effect on Growth, Production and Lignin Content of Sorghum sudanense at Different Harvest Ages
Maudi Nayanda Delastra(1), Andriyani Astuti(2), Bambang Suwignyo(3), Muhlisin Muhlisin(4), Nafiatul Umami(5*)
(1) Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
(2) Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
(3) Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
(4) Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
(5) Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of gamma-ray irradiation on Sorghum sudanense in the first offspring (F1) on plant growth, production, and lignin content at different harvest ages. This study used a split-plot design in which varieties of Sorghum sudanense with gamma irradiation and Sorghum sudanense without gamma irradiation are the main plot. Meanwhile, the harvest age is the subplot. The planting area was 1.5x1.5 m, each with 3 replications. The materials used were Sorghum sudanense without gamma-ray irradiation and the first generation seeds (F1) of Sorghum sudanense with gamma irradiation. The method used was irradiating Sorghum sudanense seeds with gamma-ray with a dose of 300 Gy, planting, maintenance, and harvesting. The harvest ages were 50, 70, and 90 days. The data observed were plant growth, namely plant height and length, dry matter (DM) and organic matter (OM) production, and lignin content. Sorghum sudanense with gamma irradiation had higher plant height, plant length, also DM, and OM production (P<0.05) than Sorghum sudanense without gamma irradiation. The lignin content of Sorghum sudanense with gamma irradiation was lower (P<0.05) than Sorghum sudanense without gamma irradiation. Longer harvest age increased (P<0.05) plant height, plant length, production, and lignin content. In conclusion, there were characteristics differences between Sorghum sudanense with gamma irradiation and without gamma irradiation (parents). The longer harvest led to higher plant height, length, production, and lignin content. There was an interaction (P<0.05) between varieties and harvest ages. Gamma irradiated Sorghum sudanense had a peak production at the age of 70 days, with a lignin content of 3.63%.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aisyah, S. I. 2006. Induction of physical mutagens in Carnations (Dianthus caryophillus Linn.) and assays the stability of its vegetatively propagated mutants. Dissertation. Graduate School. IPB University, Bogor.
AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th edn. AOAC International. Washington DC.
Astuti, Dian, B. Suhartanto, B. Suwignyo, and M. Z. Asyiqin. 2019. Effect of harvest age and nitrogen levels on production and nutrient content Sorghum bicolor L. plant variety. J. Agri. Innov. 2: 01-08.
Astuti, M. 1980. Rancangan Percobaan dan Analisis Statistik. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Atis, I., O. Konuskan, M. Duru, H. Gozubenli, and S. Yilmaz. 2012. Effect of harvesting time on yield, position and forage quality of some forage sorghum cultivars. Int. J. Agric. Biol.14: 879‒886.
Campbell, N. A., J. B. Reece, and L. G. Mitchell. 2004. Biology Edisi Kelima. Erlangga, Jakarta.
Crowder, L. V and HR Cheda. 1982 Tropical Grassland Husbandry 1st. Publish United States of America. By Longman Inc. Bandung
Datta, R. 1981. Acidogenic fermentation of lignocellulose acid yield and conversion of components. Biotechnol Bioeng. 23: 2167-2170
Gardner, F.P., R. B. Pearce, and R. L. Mitchell. 2008. Cultivation Plant Physiology. Translation UI Press, Jakarta.
Godoy, J. G. V. and T. T. Tesso. 2013. Analysis of juice yield, sugar content, and biomass accumulation in sorghum. J. Crop Sci. 53: 1288-1297.
Halpin, C., K. Holt, J. Chojecki, D. Oliver, B. Chabbert, B. Monties, K. Edwards, A. Barakate, and G. A. Foxon. 1998. Brown-midrib maize (bmr-1) a mutation affecting peroxidase and protease activity, lipid peroxidation in desi and kabuli chickpea. Pak. J. Bot. 40: 1033-1041.
Hameed, A., Shah, T. M., B. M. Atta, M. Haq, and H. Sayed. 2008 Gamma irradiation effects on seed germination and growth, protein content, peroxidase and protease activity, lipid peroxidation in desi and kabuli chickpeas. Pak J. Bot. 40: 1033–1041.
Harjadi, S. S. 2002. Introduction to Agronomy. Print 13. Gramedia Main Library, Jakarta.
Henuhili, V. and Sunarsih. 2003. Genetics. FPMIPA State University, Yogyakarta.
Human, S. 2007. Improvement of agronomic properties and quality of sorghum as a source of food, animal feed, and industrial material through plant breeding with mutation techniques. Pages 226-233. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Research Results. National Nuclear Energy Agency, Bogor.
Jung, H. J. G. 2012. Forage digestibility. The intersection of cell wall lignification and plant tissue anatomy. University of Florida. Florida.
Lehninger, A. L. 1982. Basics of Biochemistry. Erlangga, Jakarta.
Li, Y., P. Mao, W. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. You, H. Zhao, L. Zhai, and G. Liu. 2015. Dynamic expression of the nutritive values in forage sorghum populations associated with white, green and brown midrid genotypes. Field Crops Research .184: 112–122.
Miron, J., R. Solomon, G. Adin, U. Nir, M. Nikbachat, E. Yosef, A. Carmi, Z. G. Weinberg, T. Kipnis, E. Zuckerman, and D. B. Ghedalia. 2006 Effect of harvest stage and re-growth on yield, composition, ensilage and silage. Anim. Sci. Feed Technol. 148: 241–252.
Mugiono. 2001. Pemuliaan Tanaman Dengan Teknik Mutasi. Puslitbang Isotop dan Radiasi, Jakarta.
Paolella, P. 1998. Introduction to Molecular Biology. 1st edn. The McGraw-Hill Book Co., Singapore.
Parry, M. A. J., P. J. Madgwick, C. Bayon, K. Tearall, L. A. Hernandez, M. Baudo, M. Rakszegi, W. Hamada, A. AlYassin, H. Ouabbou, M. Labhilili, and A. L. Philips. 2009. Mutation discovery for crop improvement. J. Experimental Botany. 60: 2817-2825.
Preussa, S. B. and A. B. Britta. 2003. A DNA damage induced cell cycle checkpoint in Arabidopsis. genetics. 164: 323-334.
Scully, E. D., T. Gries, D. L. Funnell-Harris, Z. Xin, F. A. Kovacs, W. Vermerris, and S. E. Sattler. 2016. Characterization of novel Brown midrib 6 mutations affecting lignin biosynthesis in sorghum. J. Integral Plant Biol. 58: 136-49.
Sitompul, S. M. and B. Guritno. 1995. Plant Growth Analysis. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
Sriagtula, R. and S. Showmen.2018. Evaluation of growth and productivity of brown midrib mutant sorghum in different growth phases as forage during the dry season on ultisol soils. Indonesian J. Anim. Husbandry. 20: 130-144.
Surya, M. I. and H. Soeranto. 2006. Effect of gamma ray irradiation on the growth of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Minutes of Scientific Seminar on Isotope and Radiation Applications. 206-215.
Wardhani, N. K. 1995. Sorghum vulgare sudanense as an alternative for providing forage. Minutes of the Symposium: Prospects of Sorghum Plants for Agramo-Industry Development. 4: 327-332.
Wilson, J. R., and P. M. Kennedy. 1996. Plant and animal constraints to voluntary feed intake associated with fiber characteristics and particle breakdown and passage in ruminants. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 47: 199-225.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v45i3.62627
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 2105 | views : 1626Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Buletin Peternakan (Bulletin of Animal Science) Indexed by:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.