Evaluation of the Performances and IOFCC of Broilers Fed  the Whole, the Skinless, and the Skin of Leubim Fish Waste Meals Based Partial Replacement Feed of Commercial Diets

zulfan zulfan; Muhammad Daud; Cut Aida Fitri; Wenny Ultaria Munthe; Siti Zharfa Rasyiqah

doi:10.21059/buletinpeternak.v45i4.68906

Evaluation of the Performances and IOFCC of Broilers Fed the Whole, the Skinless, and the Skin of Leubim Fish Waste Meals Based Partial Replacement Feed of Commercial Diets

https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v45i4.68906

zulfan zulfan^(1*), Muhammad Daud⁽²⁾, Cut Aida Fitri⁽³⁾, Wenny Ultaria Munthe⁽⁴⁾, Siti Zharfa Rasyiqah⁽⁵⁾

(1) Animal Husbandry Department, the Faculty of Agriculture, Syiah Kuala University
(2) Animal Husbandry Department the Faculty of Agriculture Syiah Kuala University
(3) Animal Husbandry Department the Faculty of Agriculture Syiah Kuala University
(4) Animal Husbandry Department the Faculty of Agriculture Syiah Kuala University
(5) Animal Husbandry Department the Faculty of Agriculture Syiah Kuala University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the performances of broilers fed the commercial diet CP511 (CCP) partially substituted with leubim fish waste meal (LFW) processed into different parts i.e. whole leubim fish waste meal (LFW_W), skinless leubim fish meal (LFM_‒S), and leubim fish waste skin meal (LFW_S), each mixed with yellow corn (YC) and top mix (TM). This research was conducted at the Field Laboratory of Animal Husbandry (LLP), Syiah Kuala University from March 17 to April 21, 2021. This study used 100 DOC broiler chickens strain CP 707 and commercial local fish meal (CFM). The study used a completely randomized design (CRD) consisting of 5 treatments and 4 replications. The treatment was CCP= 100% CP511 (control+) and the CCP replaced with: CFM (control-), LFW_W, LFM_‒S, and LFW_S with the equal amount of 8% each and the addition of 8% YC + 0.5% TM each. The results showed that although statistically no significant differences (P>0.05), the inclusion of LFW meals in the form of LFW_W, LFM_‒S, or LFW_S plus YC + TM each to substitute partially CCP tended to have higher body weight gain (BWG), final body weight (FBW), feed intake, and better feed conversion ratio (FCR), and protein efficiency ratio (PER), while protein intake (PI) significantly increased (P<0.05). The inclusion of LFW-based diets reduced feed cost and increased income over feed & chick cost (IOFCC). The LFW_‒S diet did not result in better broiler performances than the LFW_W diet. In conclusion, LFW meals processed as a whole, without the skin, and the only skin added with yellow corn and top mix as a partial replacement for the commercial diet increased BWG, FBW, PI, FI, and improved FCR, reduced feed cost, and generated better profit. It was suggested not to dispose of the skin out of the waste since the whole leubim fish waste meal carried out more advantages.

Keywords

Keywords: CCanthidermis maculata, Leubim, Fish skin, Performances, IOFCC, Broiler

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdullah, L. 2019. HIVI (Hardtack Innovation Fish Scale) cookies made from fish scales to optimally increase nutrition. J. Nutr. Health Food Eng. 9: 87‒90.

Abuine, R., A. U. Rathnayake, and H. G. Byun. 2019. Biological activity of peptides purified from fish skin hydrolysates. Review. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 22: 1‒14.

Carrillo, W., C. Carpio, D. Morales, E. Vilcacundo, M. Alvarez, and M. Silva. 2017. Content of fatty acids in corn (Zea mays l.) oil from Ecuador. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 10: 150‒153.

Dei, H. K. 2017. Assessment of maize (Zea mays) as feed resource for poultry. Poultry Science, Milad Manafi, IntechOpen. DOI: 10.5772/65363. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/52383

Harikrishna, N., S. Mahalakshmi, K. K. Kumar, and G. Reddy. 2017. Fish scales as potential substrate for production of alkaline protease and amino acid rich aqua hydrolyzate by Bacillus altitudinis GVC11. Indian J. Microbiol. 57: 339–343.

Hartadi, H., S. Reksohadiprodjo, dan A. D. Tillman. 2005. Komposisi Bahan Pakan untuk Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Hussain, Z., A. Sardar, K. M. Khan, M. Y. Naz, S. A. Sulaiman, and S. Shukrullah. 2018. Construction of rechargeable protein battery from mixed-waste processing of fish scales and chicken feathers. Waste and Biomass Valorization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0535-z.

Kalamarz-Kubiak, H. 2017. Cortisol in correlation to other indicators of fish welfare, corticosteroids. Ali Gamal Al-kaf, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72392. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/58148.

Karimi, A. 2006. The effects of varying fish meal inclusion levels (%) on performance of broiler chicks. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 5: 255‒258.

Lamb, M. W. and M. L. Harden. 1973. The Meaning of Human Nutrition. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam.

Naswa, A. and E. Suprayitno. 2019. Amino acid profile and characterization of gelatin from salmon skin. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 9: 643‒646.

North, M. O. and D. D. Bell. 1990. Commercial Chicken Production Manual. 4^thedn. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9^th edn. National Research Council (NRC). National Academy Press, Washington DC.

Osborn, D. 2019. Difference between collagen and keratin. Difference between similar terms and objects. http://www.differencebetween.net/science/difference-between-collagen-and-keratin.

Ott, R. L. 1991. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. 4^th edn. Duxbury Press, Belmont, California.

Pike, I. A. 1999. Health benefits from feeding fish oil and fish meal: the role of long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in animal feeding. Ifoma 28. International Fishmeal and Oil Manufacturers Association, Hertfordshire AL3 4PA, UK.

Raza, S., T. N. Pasha, A. S. Hashmi, M. W. Shoaib, and H. Mubeen. 2015. Effect different levels and sources of fish meal on the performance of broiler chicks. Int. Journal of Scientific & Engineering 6: 1708‒1713.

Sadoul, B. and B. Geffroy. 2019. Measuring cortisol, the major stress hormone in fishes. J. Fish. Biol. 94: 540–555.

Sihite, H. H. 2013. Studi pemanfaatan limbah ikan dari Tempat Pelelangan Ikan (TPI) dan pasar tradisional Nauli Sibolga menjadi tepung ikan sebagai bahan baku pakan ternak. Jurnal Teknologi Kimia 2: 43‒54.

Solangi, A. A., A. Memon, T. A. Qureshi, H. H. Leghari, G. M. Baloch, and M. P. Wagan. 2002. Replacement of fish meal by soybean meal in broiler ration. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 1: 28‒30.

Thirumalaisamy, G., J. Muralidharan, S. Senthilkumar, R. H. Sayee, and M. Priyadharsini. 2016. Cost-effective feeding of poultry. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology 5: 3997–4005.

Utomo, N. B. P., Susan, and M. Setiawati. 2013. Peran tepung ikan dari berbagai bahan baku terhadap pertumbuhan lele sangkuriang Clarias sp. J. Akuakultur Indonesia 1: 158‒168.

Zhang, Y., D. Tu, Q. Shen, and Z. Dai. 2019. Fish scale valorization by hydrothermal pretreatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis for gelatin hydrolysate production. Molecules 24: 2998.

Zulfan, M. A. Yaman, and A. Rizki. 2020a. Performan ayam broiler yang diberi ransum dengan penggunaan tepung limbah ikan leubim (Canthidermis maculata). Jurnal Peternakan 17: 108–112.

Zulfan, M. A. Yaman, Allaily, and E. J. Marlina. 2020b. Performances of broiler chickens fed the commercial diets partially substituted with feeds containing fermented and non fermented leubim fish meal (Canthidermis maculata). Buletin Peternakan 44: 73–80.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v45i4.68906