Rasionalitas: Overview terhadap Pemikiran dalam 50 Tahun Terakhir
Abstract
Keywords
DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.26772
References
Allais, M. (1953). La Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine. English Summary. Econometrica, 21(4), 503 – 546.
Arkes, H.A., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.
Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bernoulli, D. 1738 (Translation in Econometrica 1954). Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk. Econometrica. 22:1, 23 – 36.
Coombs, C.H., Dawes, R.M., Tversky, A. (1970). Mathematical Psychology: An Elementary Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
De Bruin, W.B., Parker, A.M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938-956.
Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380-417.
Edwards, W., Miles, Jr., R.F., & von Winterfeldt, D. (Eds.). (2007). Advances in decision analysis: From foundations to applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75 (4), 643-669.
Evans, J.S.B.T., & Stanovich, K.E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Psychological Science, 83(3), 223-241.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42.
Garland, H. (1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 55-69.
Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: Short cuts to better decision making. New York: Penguin Books.
Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Personal reflections on theory and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 20, 733–743.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., & ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Hastie, R., & Dawes, R.M. (2010). Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hunt, E. (2007). The Mathematics of Behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Ferrar, Straus & Giroux.
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica. 47: 2, 263 – 291.
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (2000). (Editors). Choices, Values, and Frames. Eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Kell, M., Tan, B.C.Y., Wei, K-K., Saarinen, T., Tuunainen, V., & Wassenaar, A. (2000). A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly, 24(2), 299-325.
Keren, G., & Schul, Y. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 533–550.
Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive Styles in the Context of Modern Psychology: Toward an Integrated Framework of Cognitive Style. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 464 - 481.
Lea, S.E.G. (1994). Rationality: The Formalist View. In H. Branstatter & W. Guth (eds.). Essay in Economic Psychology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. p. 71-89.
Manktelow, K.I. (2004). Reasoning and ratioanlity: The pure and the practical. In K.I. Manketelow & M.C. Chung (Eds.), Psychology of reasoning: Theoretical and historical perspectives (pp.157-177). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
McFadden, D. (1999). Rationality for economists? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 73 – 105.
Miljkovic, D. (2005). Rational choice and irrational individuals or simply irrational theory: A critical review of the hypothesis of perfect rationality: The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34, 621-634.
Nobelprize.org. (1978). The Prize in Economics 1978 – Press Release.Nobel Media AB 2014. Web. 10 Mar 2017. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1978/press.html
Osman, M. (2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories ofreasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 988–1010.
Santos, L.R., & Rosati, A.G. (2015). The evolutionary roots of human decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 321-347.
Savage, L.J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York, NY: Wiley.
Schoemaker, P.J. (1982). The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations. Journal of Economic Literature. 20, 529 – 563.
Shafir, E., & LeBoeuf, R.A. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 491-517.
Simon, H.A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 69, 99 – 118.
Simon, H.A. (1978). Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought. The American Economic Review. 68:2, 1 – 16.
Simon, H.A. (1982). From Substantive to Procedural Rationality. In H.A. Simon (editor). Model of Bouded Rationality. Vol. 2. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Soman, D., & Cheema, A. (2001). The effect of windfall gains on the sunk-cost effect. Marketing Letters, 12(1), 51-62.
Stanovich, K.E. (2009). What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Stanovich, K.E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. New York, NY: Oxfored University Press.
Stanovich, K.E. (2016. The Comprehensive Assessment of Rational Thinking. Educational Psychologist, 5(1_, 23-34.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1998a). Who uses base rates and P(D/~H)? An analysis of individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26(1), 161-179.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1998b). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Gernal, 127, 161-188.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1998c). Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects. Thinking and Reasoning, 4(4), 289-317.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1999). Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding / acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 349-385.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (2007). Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking and Reasoning, 13(3), 225-247.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (2008a). On the relative independence of thiking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672- 695.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (2008b). On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases. Thinking and Reasoning, 14(2), 129-167.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (2014). The assessment of rational thinking: IQ ≠ RQ. Teaching of Psychology, 41, 265-271.
Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F., & Toplak, M. (2011). Intelligence and rationaly. In R.J. Sternberg & S.B. Kaufman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 784-826). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Stanovich, K. E., West, R., & Toplak, M. (2013).Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 22, 259-264.
Stanovich, K. E., West, R., & Toplak, M. (2016). The Rationality Quotient: Toward A Test of Rational Thinking. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Thaler, R.H. (1987). Anomalies: The January effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(1), 197-201.
Thaler, R.H. (1988). Anomalies: The ultimatum game. The Journal of economic perspectives, 2(4), 195-206.
Thaler, R.H. (1990). Anomalies: Savings, fungibility, and mental accounts. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(1), 193-205.
Thaler, R.H. (2015). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Toplak, M.E., West, R.F., & Stanovich, K.E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking and Reasong, 20, 147-168.
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science. 185, 1124 – 1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Evidential impact of base rates. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases (pp.153-160). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing Decisions. Journal of Business. 59: 4, 5251 – 5278.
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. 2ndEd.). Princeton: Princeton University.
West, R.F., Toplak, M.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (2008). Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 930-941.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Buletin Psikologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.