Prototipikalitas Pemimpin dalam Perspektif Identitas Sosial: Sebuah Telaah Literatur Semi Sistematik
Abstract
Keywords
DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.68667
References
Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., & Travaglino, G. A. (2013). A double standard when group members behave badly: Transgression credit to ingroup leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(5), 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033600
Abrams, D., Travaglino, G. A., Marques, J. M., Pinto, I., & Levine, J. M. (2018). Deviance credit: Tolerance of deviant ingroup leaders is mediated by their accrual of prototypicality and conferral of their right to be supported. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12255
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
Barreto, N. B., & Hogg, M. A. (2017). Evaluation of and support for group prototypical leaders: A meta-analysis of twenty years of empirical research. Social Influence, 12(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2017.1316771
Barreto, N.B. & Hogg, M.A. (2018). Influence and leadership in small groups: Impact of group prototypicality, social status, and task competence. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 2(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.16
Barth-Farkas, F. & Vera, A. (2019). Leader prototypicality and displayed power in the police: an empirical analysis of the impact on leader endorsement and trust. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 13(4), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pax080
Chemers, M.M. (2001). Leadership effectiveness: An integrative review. In M. A. Hogg, & R. S. Tindale (Eds.). BlackwellHandbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (pp. 376–399). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998458.ch16
Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., Pierro, A. & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Employees’ work effort as a function of leader group prototypicality: The moderating role of team identification. European Review of Applied Psychology, 58, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2007.01.001
Cicero, L., Pierro, A. & van Knippenberg, D. (2009). Leadership and uncertainty: How role ambiguity affects the relationship between leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. British Journal of Management, 21, 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00648.x
Cicero, L., Pierro, A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2007). Leader group prototypicality and job satisfaction: The moderating role of job stress and team identification. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11(3), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.165
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. The Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.2307/258069
De Cremer, D., Van Dijke, M., Brebels, L., & Hoogervorsto, N. (2008). Motivation to cooperate in organisations: The case of prototypical leadership and procedural fairness. Psychologica Belgica, 48(2-3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-48-2-3-157
De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Mayer, D. M. (2010). Cooperating when “you” and “I” are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1121–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020419
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005
Duck, J. M., & Fielding, K. S. (2003). Leaders and their treatment of subgroups: Implications for evaluations of the leader and the superordinate group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(3), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.153
Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010). Leader–member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor's organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1085–1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020858
Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 858–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.005
Fielding, K. S., & Hogg, M. A. (1997). Social identity, self-categorization, and leadership: A field study of small interactive groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.1.1.39
Foti, R. J., & Luch, C.H. (1992). The influence of individual differences on the perception and categorization of leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(92)90006-2
Giessner, S. R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). "License to fail": Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.002
Giessner, S. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2009). License to fail? How leader group prototypicality moderates the effects of leader performance on perceptions of leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.012
Giessner, S. R., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W., & Sleebos, E. (2013). Team-oriented leadership: the interactive effects of leader group prototypicality, accountability, and team identification. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032445
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A., & Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(10), 1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672972310009
Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2001a). Your wish is our command: The role of shared social identity in translating a leader’s vision into followers’ action. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.). Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 213–228). Psychology Press.
Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2001b). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1469–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711008
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2015). Leadership: Theory and Practice. APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Group Processes, 2, 67-94.
Hirst, G., van Dick, R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2009). A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 963–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.600
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1
Hogg, M. A. (2005). Social identity and misuse of power: The dark side of leadership. Brooklyn Law Review, 70(4), 1239–1257. Diunduh dari https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1418&context=blr
Hogg, M. A. (2008). Social identity processes and the empowerment of followers. In R. E. Riggio, I. Chaleff, & J. Lipman-Blumen (Eds.), The art of followership: How great followers create great leaders and organisations (pp. 267–276). Jossey-Bass.
Hogg, M. A. & Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. (2004). The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35 (3), 246-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496404263424
Hogg, M. A., Hains, S. C., & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1248–1263. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1248
Hogg, M. A., & Martin, R. (2003). Social identity analysis of leader-member relations: Reconciling self-categorization and leader-member exchange theories of leadership. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), SocialIdentity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice (pp. 139-154). Psychology Press.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/259266
Hogg, M., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01001-3
Hogg, M. A., Rast, D. E. & van Knippenberg, D. (2012). The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. European Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 258–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/104632 83.2012.741134
House, R., Javidan, M., & Dorfman, P. (2015). Project GLOBE: An introduction. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00070
Hudson, D., Mcloughlin, C., Margret, A. & Pandjaitan, Y. (2020). Leadership, identity, and performance: The nature and effect of prototypicality in Indonesia. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3553
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
Kalshoven, K., & Den Hartog, D,N. (2009). Ethical leader behavior and leader effectiveness: The role of prototypicality and trust. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 5, 102-119.
Kim, S. & Ishikawa, J. (2020). Employee voice mechanisms, transformational leadership, group prototypicality, and voice behaviour: a comparison of portfolio career workers in Japan, Korea and China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2021.1846963
Koivisto, S. & Rice, R. E. (2016). Leader prototypicality moderates the relation between access to flexible work options and employee feelings of respect and leader endorsement. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(22), 2771-2789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1126337
León, J.A.M., Cantisano, G.T., & Mangin, J.P.M. (2009). Leadership in nonprofit organizations of Nicaragua and El Salvador: a study from the social identity theory. The Spanish journal of psychology, 12(2), 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600002031
Li, N., Chiaburu, D. S., Kirkman, B. L., & Xie, Z. (2013). Spotlight on the followers: An examination of moderators of relationships between transformational leadership and subordinates' citizenship and taking charge. Personnel Psychology, 66(1), 225–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12014
Liang, Y., Yan, M., Law, K.S., Wang, H. & Chen, Y. (2021). Integrating the bright and dark sides of leadership: An investigation of the intragroup and intergroup effects of leader group prototypicality. Journal of Business Research, 133, 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.062
Lipponen, J., Koivisto, S., & Olkkonen, M. E. (2005). Procedural justice and status judgements: The moderating role of leader ingroup prototypicality. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.004
Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., & Freiberg, S. J. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78(3), 167–203. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2832
Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., & Harvey, J. L. (2001). System constraints on leadership perceptions, behavior, and influence: An example of connectionist level processes. In M. A. Hogg, & R. S. Tindale (Eds.). BlackwellHandbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (pp. 283–310). Blackwell.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Pierro, A., Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., van Knippenberg, D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of need for cognitive closure. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.002
Pierro, A., Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., van Knippenberg, D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2007). Leader group prototypicality and resistance to organizational change: The moderating role of need for closure and team identification. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 14(1), 27–40.
Pierro, A., Cicero, L., & Higgins, E. T. (2009). Followers’ satisfaction from working with group-prototypic leaders: Promotion focus as moderator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1105–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.020
Platow, M. J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711011
Platow, M. J., van Knippenberg, D., Haslam, S. A., van Knippenberg, B., & Spears, R. (2006). A special gift we bestow on you for being representative of us: Considering leader charisma from a self-categorization perspective. The British journal of social psychology, 45(Pt 2), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X41986
Quaquebeke, N. V., Graf, M. M., & Eckloff, T. (2014). What do leaders have to live up to? Contrasting the effects of central tendency versus ideal-based leader prototypes in leader categorization processes. Leadership, 10(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715013476081
Rochman, T.N., Samian, S. & Riantoputra, C.D. (2020). Leader endorsement: The role of leader prototypicality, leader effectiveness, and employee’s organizational identification. Jurnal Psikologi, 19(2), 108-121.
Schriesheim, C. A., & Cogliser, C. C. (2009). Construct validation in leadership research: Explication and illustration. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.06.004
Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.4.577
Shondrick, S. J., Dinh, J. E., & Lord, R. G. (2010). Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 959–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.004
Sluss, D. M. (2006). Generalizing relational identification to and from organizational identification. Dissertation. Arizona State University
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039Get rights and content
Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2014a). Up close and personal: Evidence that shared social identity is a basis for the ‘special’ relationship that binds followers to leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.008
Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Platow, M. J., Fransen, K., Yang, J., Ryan, M. K., Jetten, J., Peters, K., & Boen, F. (2014b). Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 1001–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.002
Steffens, N.K., Munt, K.A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M.J., & Haslam, S.A. (2021). Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality. Organizational Psychology Review. 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620962569
Steffens, N. K., Schuh, S. C., Haslam, S. A., Pérez, A., & van Dick, R. (2015). ‘Of the group’ and ‘for the group’: How followership is shaped by leaders’ prototypicality and group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2088
Tee, E. Y. J., Ng, Y. L., & Paulsen, N. (2014). To be one of us, you have to feel like one of us: How leaders' expressed emotions influence followers' perceptions of leader self-sacrifice intentions and effectiveness in a crisis situation. In N. M. Ashkanasy, W. J. Zerbe, & C. E. J. Härtel (Eds.), Research on Emotions in Organizations, 10, 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1746-979120140000010018
Ullrich, J., Christ, O., & van Dick, R. (2009). Substitutes for procedural fairness: Prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012936
Van Dick R. Lemoine J. E. Steffens N. K. Kerschreiter R. Akfirat S. A. Avanzi L. Dumont K. Epitropaki O. Fransen K. Giessner S. Gonzales R. Kark R. Lipponen J. Markovits Y. Monzani L. Orosz G. Pandey D. Roland-Lévy C. Schuh S. C. Haslam S. A. (2018). Identity leadership going global: Validation of the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) across 20 countries.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91, 697–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12223
van Knippenberg, D. (2011). Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.004
van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Leadership: A person-in-situation perspective. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford Library of Psychology. The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (p. 673–700). Oxford University Press.
van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25006-1
van Knippenberg, D., Lossie, N., & Wilke, H. (1994). In-group prototypicality and persuasion: Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(3), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01026.x
van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Leader Self-Sacrifice and Leadership Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Leader Prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.25
van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & Bobbio, A. (2008). Leaders as agents of continuity: Self continuity and resistance to collective change. In F. Sani (Ed.), Self continuity: Individual and collective perspectives (pp. 175–186). New York: Psychology Press.
van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, MA. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 825-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002
van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & van Dijk, E. (2000). Who takes the lead in risky decision making? Effects of group members’ individual riskiness and prototypicality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2) 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2907
van Knippenberg, D., & Wilke, H. (1992). Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220204
van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63(3), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182
Wright, J. D., Climenhage, L. J., Schmitt, M. T. & Branscombe, N. R. (2020). Perceptual harmony in judgments of group prototypicality and intragroup respect. PloS one, 15(12), e0243821. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243821
Yoshida, D. T., Sendjaya, S., Hirst, G., & Cooper, B. (2014). Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1395-1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.013
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Buletin Psikologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
* Corresponding Author
