Paradigma Transformatif dan Relevansinya bagi Riset-Riset Psikologi tentang Disabilitas
Abstract
Paper ini membahas sebuah kerangka konseptual bernama paradigma transformatif dan relevansinya bagi riset-riset tentang disabilitas. Paradigma transformatif merupakan sebuah kerangka kerja penelitian yang menekankan prinsip keadilan sosial dan konsep tanggung jawab sosial ilmu pengetahuan. Artikel ini berargumen bahwa paradigma transformatif dapat menjawab apa yang selama ini menjadi persoalan atau kesenjangan (research gap) dalam riset-riset tentang disabilitas di Indonesia. Persoalan atau kesenjangan tersebut adalah masih dominannya penggunaan perspektif patologis dalam riset-riset disabilitas di Indonesia, termasuk studi-studi yang dilakukan di ranah psikologi. Artikel ini disusun berdasar tinjauan literatur atas referensi-referensi utama tentang paradigma transformatif yang ditulis oleh Donna M. Mertens. Berpijak pada tinjauan literatur tersebut, artikel ini berargumen bahwa paradigma transformatif dapat mencegah terjadinya patologisasi dalam riset-riset disabilitas karena paradigma ini menawarkan orientasi axiologis, ontologis, epistemologis dan metodologis yang lebih adil dan kritis dalam melihat persoalan disabilitas.
Keywords
DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.83814
References
Abiyoga, M. I. & Sawitri, D. R. (2017). “Tabah dalam kekuranganku” Studi kualitatif mengenai hardiness pada individu dewasa madya penyandang tunadaksa yang bekerja. Jurnal Empati, (6)4, 25 – 32. https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2017.19984
Adioetomo, S. M., Mont, D., & Irwanto. (2014). Persons with disabilities in Indonesia: Empirical facts and implications for social protection policies. Demographic Institute, Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia.
Andriana, E., & Evans, D. (2021). Voices of students with intellectual disabilities: Experiences of transition in “inclusive schools” in Indonesia. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(3), 316-328.https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12411
Balcazar, F. E., Keys, C. B., Kaplan, D. L., & Suarez-Balcazar, Y. (1998). Participatory action research and people with disabilities: Principles and challenges. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 105-112.
Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (Eds.). (1997). Doing disability research. Disability Press.
Barnes, C. (2012). Understanding the social model of disability. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies. (pp. 12 – 29). Routledge.
Bonati, M. L., & Andriana, E. (2021). Amplifying children’s voices within photovoice: Emerging inclusive education practices in Indonesia. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(4), 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12405
Burns, D., Howard, J., & Ospina, S. M. (Eds.). (2021). The SAGE handbook of participatory research and inquiry. SAGE.
Cameron, L., & D. C. Suarez. (2017). Disability in Indonesia: What can we learn from the data? Monash University.
Campbell, J., & Oliver, M. (1996). Disability politics. Routledge.
Chandra, A., & Tambun, L. (2021). Gambaran self-compassion pada ibu yang memiliki anak tuna grahita di Yayasan Pembina Anak Cacat Medan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Kesehatan, (2)1, 89 – 95. https://doi.org/10.51849/j-p3k.v2i1.98
Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J. (2019). Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. Routledge.
Crow, L. (1992). Renewing the social model of disability. Coalition News, 5 – 9. http://www.roaring-girl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Renewing-the-Social-model.Coalition-News.pdf
DePoy, E., & Gilson, S. F. (2011). Studying disability: Multiple theories and responses. Sage.
Febriani, I. (2018). Penerimaan diri pada remaja penyandang tuna daksa. Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, (6)1, 150 – 157. http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/psikoborneo.v6i1.4539
Foreman, P. (2005). Language and disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 30(1), 57-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250500033003
Goodley, D. & Lawthom, R. (2005) Epistemological journeys in participatory action research: alliances between community psychology and disability studies, Disability & Society, 20(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590500059077
Goodley, D., & Lawthom, R. (Eds.) (2006). Disability and psychology: Critical introductions and reflections. Palgrave
Goodley, D. (2011). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. Sage.
Goodley, D. (2012). The psychology of disability. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Routledge handbook to disability studies (pp. 310-323). Routledge
Gordon, J. S., Põder, J. C., & Burckhart, H. (Eds.). (2017). Human rights and disability: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Taylor & Francis.
Gubrium, A., & Harper, K. (2016). Participatory visual and digital methods. Routledge.
Handoyo, R., Ali, A., Scior, K., & Hassiotis, A. (2022). A qualitative exploration of stigma experience and inclusion among adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability in an Indonesian context. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 26(2), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295211002349
Himpunan Psikologi Indonesia (HIMPSI). (2010). Kode etik psikologi Indonesia. https://himpsi.or.id/organisasi/kode-etik-psikologi-indonesia pada 11 Maret 2023.
Hughes, B. (2012). Fear, pity and disgust: Emotions and the non-disabled imaginary. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Eds.). Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 67-77). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203144114
Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (PPN). (2021). Tinjauan peningkatan akses dan taraf hidup penyandang disabilitas Indonesia: Aspek Sosioekonomi dan yuridis. https://perpustakaan.bappenas.go.id/e-library/file_upload/koleksi/dokumenbappenas/file/Staf%20Ahli%20Menteri%20Bidang%20Sosial%20dan%20Penanggulangan%20Kemiskinan/Kajian%20Disabilitas%20-%20Tinjauan%20Peningkatan%20Akses%20dan%20Taraf%20Hidup%20Penyandang%20Disabilitas%20Indonesia%20Aspek%20%20Sosioekonomi%20dan%20Yuridis.pdf
Kiling, I. Y., Boeky, D. L., Rihi Tugu, P. A., Bunga, B. N., & Andriana, E. (2023). How do preschool teachers perceive students’ developmental in difficult times? A photovoice study. Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237231160088
Kusumastuti, P., Pradanasari, R., & Ratnawati, A. (2014). The problems of people with disability in Indonesia and what is being learned from the World Report on Disability. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 93(1), S63-S67. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000025
Lacey, F. M., Matheson, L., & Jesson, J. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. Sage
Li, S., & Wang, H. (2018). Traditional literature review and research synthesis. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.). The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 123-144). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1
Little, C., DeLeeuw, R. R., Andriana, E., & Zanuttini, J. (2022). Social inclusion through the eyes of the student: Perspectives from students with disabilities on friendship and acceptance. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(6), 2074-2093. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1837352
Lusli, M., Zweekhorst, M., Miranda-Galarza, B., Peters, R. M., Cummings, S., Seda, F. S., & Bunders, J. F. (2015). Dealing with stigma: experiences of persons affected by disabilities and leprosy. BioMed Research International, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/261329
Mallett, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Approaching Disability: Critical issues and perspectives. Routledge.
Marpaung, Y. M., Ernawati, E., & Dwivania, A. T. (2022). Stigma towards leprosy across seven life domains in Indonesia: a qualitative systematic review. BMJ Open, 12(11). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062372]
Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). “What’s so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies?”, Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1): 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2009.11910861
Meekosha, H., & Soldatic, K. (2011). Human rights and the Global South: The case of disability. Third World Quarterly, 32(8), 1383-1397. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41300291
Mercer, G. (2002). Emancipatory disability research. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.), Disability studies today (pp. 228-249). Polity.
Mercer, G. (2004). From critique to practice: Emancipatory disability research. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research (pp. 118-137). The Disability Press.
Mertens, D. M. (2007). Transformative considerations: Inclusion and social justice. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(1), 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006298058
Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. Guilford.
Mertens, D.M. (2010). Social transformation and evaluation. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 10(2), pp. 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X1001000202
Mertens, D. M. (2011). Integrating Pathways: Research and policy making in pursuit of social justice. International Review of Qualitative Research, 4(2), 149-169. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/irqr.2011.4.2.149
Mertens, D. M., Sullivan, M. & Stace, H. (2011) Transformative research in the disability community. In N. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (4th ed., pp. 227 – 242). Sage.
Mertens, D. M. (2012). Transformative mixed methods: Addressing inequities. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 802-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433797
Mertens, D. M. (2015). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Mertens, D.M. & Zimmerman, H. (2015). A transformative framework for culturally responsive evaluation. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), Continuing the journey to reposition culture and cultural context in evaluation theory and practice. (pp. 275-288). Information Age Publishing.
Mertens, D.M. (2017). Transformative research: personal and societal. International Journal of Transformative Research, 4(1), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijtr-2017-0001
Mertens, D.M. (2018). Transformative mixed methods and policy evaluation. Diritto Quest Pubbliche, 18(1), 247-264
Mertens, D. M. & Wilson, A.T. (2019). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. 2nd ed. Guilford.
Mertens, D. M. (2021). Transformative research methods to increase social impact for vulnerable groups and cultural minorities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1 – 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211051563
Mitchell, D., & Snyder, S. L. (2012). Minority model: From liberal to neoliberal futures of disability. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Eds.) Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 42-50). Routledge.
Moore, M., Beazley, S., & Maelzer, J. (1998). Researching disability issues. Open University Press.
Munger, K., & Mertens, D.M. (2011). Conducting research with the disability community: A rights-based approach. In T.S. Rocco (Ed.), Challenging ableism, understanding disability, including adults with disabilities in workplaces and learning spaces, (pp. 23-34). Wiley Periodicals Inc.
Ningtyas, A. P. & Indriana, Y. (2023). Studi fenomenologi: Proses membangun kepercayaan diri pada penyandang tunadaksa dewasa awal akibat kecelakaan. Jurnal Empati, (12)3, 237 – 245. https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2023.29443
Oliver, M. (2009). Understanding disability: From theory to Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Peters, R. M. H., Zweekhorst, M. B. M., Van Brakel, W. H., Bunders, J. F. G., & Irwanto. (2016). ‘People like me don't make things like that’: Participatory video as a method for reducing leprosy-related stigma. Global Public Health, 11(5-6), 666-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1153122
Putra, C. H., & Novitasari, R. (2018). Hubungan antara dukungan sosial dan acceptance of disability pada tunadaksa. Intuisi Jurnal Psikologi Ilmiah, (10)1, 2541 – 2965. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/INTUISI/article/view/17382
Reeve, D. (2006). Towards a psychology of disability: The emotional effects of living in a disabling society. In D. Goodley & R. Lawthom (Eds.), Disability and psychology: Critical introductions and reflections (pp. 94 - 107). Palgrave Macmillan.
Reeve, D. (2012). Pyscho-emotional disablism: the missing link? In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 78 - 93). Routledge.
Shakespeare, T. (2006). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), Disability studies Reader (2nd ed., pp. 197 - 204). Routledge.
Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. Routledge.
Shakespeare, T. (Ed.). (2015). Disability research today: International perspectives. Routledge.
Shakespeare, T.(2017), ‘Critiquing the social model’, in E. Emens & M. Stein (eds.), Disability and equality law, pp. 67–94. Routledge
Smith, S. R. (2009). Social justice and disability: Competing interpretations of the medical and social model. In K. Kristiansen, S. Vehmas., & T. Shakespeare. Arguing about disability: Philosophical perspective (pp. 15 – 29). Routledge.
Stone, E., & Priestley, M. (1996). Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. British Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 699-716. https://doi.org/10.2307/591081
Suharto. (2011). Diffability and community-based empowerment: Lessons from the translation of the right to work of people with impairments in Indonesia. VDM VErlag Dr. Muller.
Suharto, S., Kuipers, P., & Dorsett, P. (2016). Disability terminology and the emergence of ‘diffability’ in Indonesia. Disability & Society, 31(5), 693-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1200014
Teo, T. (2011). Theory and empirical research: Can scientific ideas be violent? In P. Stenner, J. Cromby, J. Motzkau, J. Yen, & Y. Haosheng (Eds.), Theoretical psychology: Global transformations and challenges, (pp. 239– 246). Captus Jossey Bass.
Teo, T. (2018). Should psychologists care about injustice? In T. Teo, Outline of theoretical psychology, (pp. 201-218). Palgrave Macmillan.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Buletin Psikologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
* Corresponding Author
