#119209 Review
Submission To Be Reviewed
| Title | Exploring the Body Dissatisfaction in Adolescence: A Systematic Literature Review |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Abstract | Riset ini mengangkat isu penting terkait body dissatisfaction pada masa adolescence yang terbukti berdampak multidimensional seperti penurunan kepercayaan diri, gangguan kesehatan mental, perilaku diet tidak sehat, dan munculnya kecenderungan gangguan makan. Riset ini bertujuan menganalisis perilaku body dissatisfaction pada remaja dengan usia 11-20 tahun dan mengkaji faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi body dissatisfaction pada remaja. Metode yang digunakan adalah Systematic Literature Review dengan menganalisis 50 artikel yang diperoleh dari Google Scholar, Sinta, Publish or Perish, Springer Nature Link, BMC Psychology, Scimago Journal, dan DOAJ dengan rentang publikasi tahun 2017-2026. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa body dissatisfaction pada remaja dipengaruhi oleh faktor internal seperti persepsi diri dan harga diri dan faktor eksternal seperti media sosial, standar penampilan, dan tekanan sosial, serta berdampak signifikan terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis remaja. Sehingga dapat diinterpretasikan bahwa body dissatisfaction pada masa adolescence merupakan fenomena kompleks yang dipengaruhi oleh faktor multidimensional dan memerlukan pendekatan intervensi yang komprehensif dan berbasis bukti. |
| Submission Editor |
Buletin Psikologi |
| Submission Metadata | View Metadata |
Review Schedule
| Editor's Request | 2026-10-14 |
| Your Response | 2026-10-23 |
| Review Submitted | 2026-10-25 |
| Review Due | 2026-10-28 |
Review Steps
| 1. | Notify the submission's editor as to whether you will undertake the review. | ||||
| Response Accepted | |||||
| 2. | If you are going to do the review, consult Reviewer Guidelines below. | ||||
| 3. | Click on file names to download and review (on screen or by printing) the files associated with this submission. | ||||
|
|||||
| 4. |
Declare whether or not you have competing interests with regard to this research (see CI Policy).
Saya menyatakan bahwa saya tidak memiliki konflik kepentingan, baik finansial maupun nonfinansial, yang berkaitan dengan penelitian ini dan proses peninjauan naskah. |
||||
| 5. | Click on icon to fill in the review form. | ||||
|
Review Form
|
|||||
| 6. | In addition, you can upload files for the editor and/or author to consult. | ||||
|
|||||
| 7. | Select a recommendation and submit the review to complete the process. You must enter a review or upload a file before selecting a recommendation. | ||||
|
|||||
Reviewer Guidelines
Guidelines for Reviewers
The responsibility of Peer Reviewer
The peer reviewer is responsible for critiquing by reading and evaluating manuscripts in the field of expertise, then giving constructive advice and honest feedback to the author of the article submitted. Peer reviewers, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article, how to increase the strength and quality of the paper, and evaluate the relevance and authenticity of the manuscript.
Before reviewing, please note the following:
• Is the article requested to be reviewed in accordance with your expertise?
If you receive a script that covers the topics that are not appropriate areas of your expertise, please notify the editor as soon as possible. Please recommend an alternative reviewer.
• Do you have the time to review this paper?
The review process must be completed within two weeks. If you agree and require a longer period, notify the editor as soon as possible, or suggest an alternative reviewer.
• Is there any potential conflict of interest?
Meanwhile, conflicts of interest will not disqualify you as a reviewer, disclose all conflicts of interest to the editor before reviewing. If you have any questions about potential conflicts of interest, do not hesitate to contact the editorial office.


