COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CONVENTIONAL VERSUS RAPID METHODS FOR AMPLIFIABLE GENOMIC DNA ISOLATION OF CULTURED Azospirillum sp. JG3

https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.21284

Stalis Norma Ethica(1), Dilin Rahayu Nataningtyas(2), Puji Lestari(3), Istini Istini(4), Endang Semiarti(5), Jaka Widada(6), Tri Joko Raharjo(7*)

(1) Biotechnology Study Program of Postgraduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281
(2) Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281
(3) Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto 53123
(4) Laboratorium Penelitian dan Pengujian Terpadu, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281
(5) Biotechnology Study Program of Postgraduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281
(6) Biotechnology Study Program of Postgraduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281
(7) Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


As an initial attempt to reveal genetic information of Azospirillum sp. JG3 strain, which is still absence despite of the strains' ability in producing valued enzymes, two groups of conventional methods: lysis-enzyme and column-kit; and two rapid methods: thermal disruption and intact colony were evaluated. The aim is to determine the most practical method for obtaining high-grade PCR product using degenerate primers as part of routine-basis protocols for studying the molecular genetics of the Azospirillal bacteria. The evaluation includes the assessment of electrophoresis gel visualization, pellet appearance, preparation time, and PCR result of extracted genomic DNA from each method. Our results confirmed that the conventional methods were more superior to the rapid methods in generating genomic DNA isolates visible on electrophoresis gel. However, modification made in the previously developed DNA isolation protocol giving the simplest and most rapid method of all methods used in this study for extracting PCR-amplifiable DNA of Azospirillum sp. JG3. Intact bacterial cells (intact colony) loaded on electrophoresis gel could present genomic DNA band, but could not be completely amplified by PCR without thermal treatment. It can also be inferred from our result that the 3 to 5-min heating in dH2O step is critical for the pre-treatment of colony PCR of Azospirillal cells.

Keywords


genomic DNA isolation methods; PCR amplifiable DNA; Gram-negative bacteria; Azospirillum sp. JG3

Full Text:

Full Text PDF


References

[1] Chen, H., Rangasamy, M., Tan, S.Y., Wang, H., and Siegfried, B.D., 2010, PLos ONE, 5, 8, e11963.

[2] Kalia, A., Rattan, A., and Chopra, P., 1999, Anal. Biochem., 275, 1, 1–5.

[3] Goldenberger, D., Perschil, I., Ritzler, M., and Altwegg, M., 1995, PCR Methods Appl., 4, 6, 368–370.

[4] Wilson, K., 2001, Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol., Ch. 2, Unit 2.4., 2.4.1–2.4.5.

[5] Moore, E., Arnscheidt, A., Krüger, A., Strömpl, C., and Mau, M., 2004, “Simplified protocols for the preparation of genomic DNA from bacterial cultures” in Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual, 2nd ed., Kluwer Academic Publisher, Netherland, 1.01, 3–18.

[6] Pedraza, R.O., Díaz-Ricci, J.C., Spencer, J.F.T., and de Spencer, A.L.R., 2004, “A simple method for obtaining DNA suitable for RAPD analysis from Azospirillum” in Environmental Microbiology: Methods and Protocols, Humana Press, Totowa, USA, 16,151–157.

[7] Dauphin, L.A., Stephens, K.W., Eufinger, S.C., and Bowen, M.D., 2009, J. Appl. Microbiol., 108, 1, 163–172.

[8] Shahriar, M., Haque, Md.R., Kabir, S., Dewan, I., and Bhuyian, M.A., 2011, J. Pharm. Sci., 4, 1, 53–57.

[9] Dickson, E.M., Riggio, M.P., and Macpherson, L., 2005, J. Med. Microbiol., 54, 3, 299–303.

[10] Vitzthum, F., Geiger, G., Bisswanger, H., Elkine, B., Brunner, H., and Bernhagen, J., 2000, Nucleic Acid Res., 28, 8, e37.

[11] Mavingui, P., Flores,M., Guo,X., Dávila, G., Perret, X.,Broughton, W.J.,and Palacios, R., 2002, J. Bacteriol., 184, 1, 171–176.

[12] Chen, W-P., and Kuo, T-T., 1993, Nucleic Acid Res., 21, 9, 2260.

[13] Schneegurt, M.A., Dore, S.Y., and Kulpa, Jr.C.F., 2003, Curr. Issues Mol. Biol., 5, 1, 1–8.

[14] Lucchini, F., Kmet, V., Cesena, C., Coppi L., Bottazzi, V., and Morelli, L., FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 158, 2, 273–278.

[15] Joshi, A.K., Baichwal, V., and Ames, G.F., 1991, BioTechniques, 10, 42–44.

[16] Fode-Vaughan, K.A., Wimpee, C.F., Remsen, C.C., and Collins, M.L.P., 2001, BioTechniques, 31, 598–607.

[17] Díaz-Zorita, M., and Fernández-Canigia, M.V., 2009, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 45, 1, 3–11.

[18] Hartmann, A., and Bashan, Y., 2009, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 45, 1–2.

[19] Lestari, P., Handayani, S.N., and Oedjijono. 2009, Molekul, 4, 2, 73–82.

[20] Zusfahair, and Ningsih, D.R., 2012, Molekul 7, 1, 9–19.

[21] Geneaid®, 2013, Genomic DNA Mini Kit: Cultured Bacteria Protocol, Geneaid Biotech, Taipei.

[22] Kim, C., Kecskés, M.L., Deaker, R.J., Gilchrist, K., New, P.B., Kennedy, I.R., Kim, S., and Sa, T., 2005, Can. J. Microbiol., 51, 11, 948–956.

[23] Espinosa, I., Báez, M., Percedo, M.I., and Martínez, S., 2013, Rev. Salud Anim., 35, 1, 59–63.

[24] Wan, M., Rosenberg, J.N., Faruq, J., Betenbaugh, M.J., and Xia, J., 2011, Biotechnol. Lett., 33, 8, 1615–1619.

[25] Sheu, D-S., Wang, Y-T., and Lee, C-Y., 2000, Microbiology, 146, 8, 2019–2025.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.21284

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2235 | views : 3189


Copyright (c) 2013 Indonesian Journal of Chemistry

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 

Indonesian Journal of Chemistry (ISSN 1411-9420 /e-ISSN 2460-1578) - Chemistry Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.

Web Analytics View The Statistics of Indones. J. Chem.