Purchases Decision Making Inventory: Measurement Validation in Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.74583

Sella Ishak(1), Honey Wahyuni Sugiharto Elgeka(2*)

(1) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya
(2) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The empirical limitations of the Consumer Styles Inventory (CSI) render the formation of dimensions from this measuring tool-less relevant. Scholars have attempted developing Purchase Decision Making Inventory (PDMI) measuring tool to answer cognitive and emotional processes in decision-making. This research examined the validity of the internal structure of the purchasing decision-making inventory (PDMI) measuring device in the Indonesian context. PDMI has two main dimensions, namely emotional and reasoned. The emotional dimension has five sub-dimensions: impulsivity, indebtedness, negative emotions, frustration, and hedonism. The reasoned dimension has three sub-dimensions: saving, reasoning, and information seeking. The main dimensions explain the differences in cognitive and affective processes that occur in consumers when making decisions. The internal structure of PDMI was evaluated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and reliability analysis. The population of this study was Indonesian people aged 18-25 years (M = 20.3 years, SD = 1.55). The sample in this study was 588. The results of the CFA analysis showed that the results fit the data. The model accuracy indices used are the comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). The CFI value is 0.932, the TLI value is 0.921, and the RMSEA is 0.046. The results of this research are supported by the reliability results of each sub-dimension and the primary dimension of the PDMI measuring instrument, which has a Cronbach's alpha value ≥ 0.6 with a corrected item-total correlation (CITC) ≥ 0.3 which can be concluded that the PDMI measuring device is valid based on internal structure and reliable evidence sources.

Keywords


purchases decision-making style, confirmatory factor analisis (CFA), validity, reliability

Full Text:

PDF


References

Abubakar, I. J., Wimmer, B. C., Bereznicki, L. R., Dwan, C., Black, J. A., Bezabhe, W. M., & Peterson, G. M. (2020). Development and validation of an atrial fibrillation knowledge assessment tool (AFKAT). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1721), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051721

Amanah, D., Harahap, D. A., & Lisnawati, D. (2017). Exploring online purchase decision among university students in Indonesia. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(5), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2212057277

Anguiano, F. L. S., Aguayo, J. M. B., Palacios, J., Zeelenberg, M., & Loving, R. D. (2019). Development and validation of the inventory of emotional and reasoned purchases decision-making styles (PDMI). Suma Psicologica, 26(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2019.v26.n2.3

Anguiano, F. L. S., Palacios, J., Aguayo, J. M. B., & Loving, R. D. (2018). Consumer decision-making exploration: Approach from impulsive and reasoned. Aportaciones Actuales a La Psicología Social, 4(August), 897–915.

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Bachkirov, A. A. (2015). Managerial decision making under specific emotions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(7), 861–874. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2013-0071

BI, B. I. (2022). Survei konsumen (SK) (Issue Februari).

Budiastuti, D., & Bandur, A. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas penelitian. In Binus. Mitra Wacana Media.

Chaudhary, S., & Dey, A. K. (2016). A confirmatory factor analysis of teenage consumer styles inventory: Evidence from India. In Amity Business Review (Vol. 17, Issue 1, pp. 31–41).

Chuang, S. C., & Lin, H. M. (2007). The effect of induced positive and negative emotion and openness-to-feeling in student’s consumer decision making. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-007-9049-6

Cui, Z. (2018). Happiness and consumption: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics, 65(4), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-018-0303-1

Dewi Urip Wahyuni. (2008). Pengaruh motivasi, persepsi dan sikap konsumen terhadap keputusan pembelian sepeda motor merek “Honda” di kawasan Surabaya Barat. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 10(1), pp.30-37. http://puslit2.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/man/article/view/16790

Efendi, M. M., & Purnomo, J. D. T. (2012). Analisis faktor konfirmatori untuk mengetahui kesadaran berlalu lintas pengendara sepeda motor di Surabaya Timur. Jurnal Sains Dan Seni ITS, 1(1).

Gangai, K. N., & Agrawal, R. (2016). The influence of personality traits on consumer impulsive buying behaviour. International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21863/ijmbc/2016.5.1.027

Garg, N., Williams, L. A., & Lerner, J. S. (2018). The misery-is-not-miserly effect revisited: Replication despite opportunities for compensatory consumption. PLoS ONE, 13(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199433

Gutnik, L. A., Hakimzada, A. F., Yoskowitz, N. A., & Patel, V. L. (2006). The role of emotion in decision-making: A cognitive neuroeconomic approach towards understanding sexual risk behavior. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39(6), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2006.03.002

Guven, C. (2012). Reversing the question: Does happiness affect consumption and savings behavior? Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(4), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.01.002

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

International Test Commission, I. (2018). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (Second Edition). International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.

Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016755

Kumar, A. (2019). Factors influencing consumer behaviour. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 6(8), 757–763. https://doi.org/10.17221/283-agricecon

Laros, F. J. M., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2005). Emotions in consumer behavior: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research, 58(10), 1437–1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.013

Lee, G. Y., & Yi, Y. (2008). The effect of shopping emotions and perceived risk on impulsive buying: The moderating role of buying impulsiveness trait. Seoul Journal of Business, 14(2), 67–92.

Lysonski, S., Durvasula, S., & Zotos, Y. (1996). Consumer decision‐making styles: A multi‐country investigation. European Journal of Marketing, 30(12), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610153273

Natalya, L., & Purwanto, C. V. (2018). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the academic motivation scale (AMS)–Bahasa Indonesia. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 22(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.2130118

Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications (Issue 1). SAGE Publication.

Palacios, J., & Soler, L. (2017). Estudio preliminar del perfil comparativo del control financiero en jóvenes universitarios (Preleminary study of the comparative profile of financial control in university young people). Ciencias Psicológicas, 11(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v11i2.1491

Santoso, G., & Triwijayati, A. (2018). Gaya pengambilan keputusan pembelian pakaian secara online pada generasi Z Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga Dan Konsumen, 11(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2018.11.3.231

Scandura, T. A. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior (Second edi). SAGE Publication.

Shim, S. (1996). Adolescent consumer decision-making styles: The consumer socialization perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 13(6), 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199609)13:6<547::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-8

Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1086/209563

Singh, A., & Medhavi, S. (2018). Consumer purchase decision making styles: A conceptual framework. Commerce Today, 12(01), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.29320/jnpgct.v12i01.10987

Sokang, A. (2019). Harga, nilai, & kualitas: Pengambilan keputusan membeli mahasiswa di Jakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Perilaku, 3(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.25077/jip.3.1.48-58.2019

Sproles, G. B., & Kendall, E. L. (1986). A methodology for profiling consumers’ decision‐making styles. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 20(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1986.tb00382.x

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

Watson, L., & Spence, M. T. (2007). Causes and consequences of emotions on consumer behaviour: A review and integrative cognitive appraisal theory. European Journal of Marketing, 41(5–6), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710737570



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.74583

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1839 | views : 1525

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Psikologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Published by Faculty of Psychology Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia Building D 6th Floor No. D-606. Jl. Sosio Humaniora No. 1, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta, 55281
Email: jurnalpsikologi@ugm.ac.id
Phone/whatsApp: +6289527548628

Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter View My Stats