Factors influencing limited repository access in academic libraries
Abstract
Introduction. Several academic libraries have implemented restrictions on repository access in recent years. This study explores the phenomenon of restricted access in academic libraries in managing their repositories.
Method. This research uses a qualitative approach through interviews with six librarians from three academic libraries in the Special Region of Yogyakarta that have implemented repository access restrictions. Locations were selected through online observations of repository websites and direct. Library heads and staff involved in or understanding the access restriction process were selected purposively as informants.
Data Analysis. The interview data were analyzed using reduction and thematic categorization techniques. The data were presented and analyzed to draw conclusions.
Results and Discussion. Librarians, who generally support open access, face requests from faculty and university leadership to restrict access. Restrictions are implemented to protect intellectual rights and sensitive data, to maintain physical visits to the library. Other factors include concerns about plagiarism, personal data protection, patent rights, and preventing the illegal document distribution.
Conclusion. There are eight factors in restricting access to academic library repositories. Access restrictions are based on the dynamic policies among stakeholders within the university. This study provides insights for academic library policymakers in balancing open access with intellectual property rights protection.
References
Aliwijaya, A., & Khoir, S. (2023). Better open or closed? Library institutional repository access policies in Yogyakarta Indonesia. Makalah dipresentasikan dalam International Graduate Students and Scholars’ Conference in Indonesia (IGSSCI).
Anderson, T., & Leachman, C. (2020). Centering accessibility: A review of institutional repository policy and practice. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 8(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2383
Asmad, C. C., Mathar, T., Akbar, A. K., Arifin, N., , H., , H., , I., , I., & , S. (2018). Tren perkembangan open access institutional repository pada perguruan tinggi di Indonesia. Khizanah Al-Hikmah : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, dan Kearsipan, 6(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v6i2a8
Blumesberger, S. (2018). New requirements – many open questions. On the diverse roles of repositories using the example of the Vienna university library. VOEB-Mitteilungen, 71(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.31263/voebm.v71i1.2003
BOAI. (2012). Prologue: The Budapest open access initiative after 10 years. Open Access Initiative Declaration; September 2012. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai10/
BPS Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (2023). Provinsi DI Yogyakarta dalam angka 2023. https://yogyakarta.bps.go.id/publication/2023/02/28/026aad493ec54b735d608483/provinsi-di-yogyakarta-dalam-angka-2023.html
Cahyono, H. A. (2019). Implementasi kebijakan akses fulltext karya ilmiah dosen pada repositori institusi Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri (STAIN) Pamekasan. Tibanndaru : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 3(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.30742/tb.v3i1.681
Chaudhuri, J., & Baker, S. (2015). Identifying open access articles within the top ten closed access LIS journals: A global perspective. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2015(1), [1-15].
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Dawson, P. H., & Yang, S. Q. (2016). Institutional repositories, open access and copyright: What are the practices and implications? Science and Technology Libraries, 35(4), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2016.1224994
Dubinsky, E. (2019). Does open access make cents?: Return on investment in the institutional repository. College and Research Libraries News, 80(5), 281–284. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.80.5.281
Ernaningsih, D. N. (2018). Institutional repository access policy: A case study in State University of Malang Library. Record and Library Journal, 3(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.v3-i1.2017.25-37
Fitriani, D. N. (2017). Studi kasus peran pustakawan dalam penerapan open access di Perpustakaan UIN Malang. Acarya Pustaka, 3(2), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.23887/ap.v3i2.13057
Garaba, F. (2019). The demise of the Lutheran Theological Institute library and archives in retrospect: Reflections of a manuscript librarian in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. Missionalia, 46(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.7832/46-3-251
Giesecke, J. (2011). Institutional repositories: Keys to success. Journal of Library Administration, 51(5–6), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.589340
Handoyo, E., & Istiarni, A. (2020). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pelaksanaan kebijakan open access di perpustakaan perguruan tinggi negeri: Studi kasus perpustakaan perguruan tinggi negeri di Jawa Tengah. Visi Pustaka: Buletin Jaringan Informasi Antar Perpustakaan, 22(1), 15–26.
Harliansyah, F. (2016). Institutional repository sebagai sarana komunikasi ilmiah yang sustainable dan reliable. Pustakaloka, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21154/pustakaloka.v8i1.497
Hartono, H. (2022). Representasi demokrasi informasi sebagai strategi pengembangan perpustakaan dalam ekosistem digital studi teoritis pendekatan dalam membangun open access pada perpustakaan perguruan tinggi di Malang. UNILIB : Jurnal Perpustakaan, 13(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.20885/unilib.vol13.iss1.art4
Irawan, D. E., Abraham, J., Zein, R. A., Ridlo, I. A., & Aribowo, E. K. (2021). Open access in Indonesia. Development and Change, 52(3), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12637
Kardi, K. (2019). Integrasi interkoneksi sains dan studi agama dalam implementasi open access repository di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri (PTKIN). Al-Kuttab : Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan, Informasi dan Kearsipan, 1(2), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.24952/ktb.v1i2.2053
Koler-Povh, T., Mikoš, M., & Turk, G. (2014). Institutional repository as an important part of scholarly communication. Library Hi Tech, 32(3), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-10-2013-0146
Kyprianos, K., & Lygnou, E. (2022). Institutional repositories and copyright in Greek academic libraries. JLIS.It, 13(2), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-449
Lee, J., Burnett, G., Vandegrift, M., Baeg, J. H., & Morris, R. (2015). Availability and accessibility in an open access institutional repository: A case study. Information Research, 20(1), paper 661. http://InformationR.net/ir/20-1/paper661.html.
Liauw, T. T., & Genoni, P. (2017). A Different shade of green: A Survey of Indonesian higher education institutional repositories. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 4(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2136
Loan, F. A., & Shah, U. Y. (2020). Global electronic thesis and dissertation repositories-collection diversity and management issues. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 33, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.524
Madukoma, E., & Adekunle, A. P. (2024). Open access publishing. In Encyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science, First Edition, Four Volume Set, 4(2025), 424-433). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00244-3
Makhotina, N., & Pshenichnaya, E. (2021). The features of restricted access to information at European and East Asian Libraries. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 9(3), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2021.9.3.3
Marsh, R. M. (2015). The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research. OCLC Systems and Services, 31(4), 163–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022
Mishra, D., & Kumar, R. (2023). Institutional repository: A Green access for research information. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 13(1), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2023.13.1.3471
Neuendorf, K. A. (2018). Content analysis and thematic analysis. In Advanced research methods for applied psychology (pp. 211–223). Routledge.
Nurdin, L., & Mukhlis, S. (2019). Institutional repository as an information infrastructure for scholarly communication: An exploratory study in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 24(3), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24no3.6
Pratama, Y. B. (2018). Kebijakan open access institutional repository: Studi multisitus pada 3 (tiga) perguruan tinggi negeri di Malang [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Brawijaya]. http://repository.ub.ac.id/view/year/2023.html
Priyanto, I. F. (2015). Readiness of Indonesian academic libraries for open access and open access repositories implementation: A study on Indonesian open access repositories registered in OpenDOAR. [Dissertation University of North Texas].
Priyanto, I. F. (2022). The struggle of open access publishing: The Indonesian perspective. In Daniel Gelaw Alemneh (Ed.), Handbook of Research on the Global View of Open Access and Scholarly Communications (pp. 65–80). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9805-4.CH004
Prost, H., & Schöpfel, J. (2014). Degrees of openness: Access restrictions in institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 20(7–8). https://doi.org/10.1045/july2014-prost
Rafiq, M. (2022). Institutional repositories (IRs) in universities of Pakistan: Issues and emergent framework for remedies. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102480
Rinehart, A., & Cunningham, J. (2017). Breaking it down: A brief exploration of institutional repository submission agreements. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.10.002
Rodliyah, U. (2023). Librarian’s perception of open access repository policy in Islamic State University Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 11(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v11i2.46758
Safira, F. (2021). Kebijakan open access repositori institusi di perpustakaan perguruan tinggi: Kajian best practice studi literature. Pustakaloka, 13(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.21154/pustakaloka.v13i1.2457
Shukla, P., & Khan, A. M. (2014). Implications of institutional repositories on contributors’ professional and publishing practices: A Survey. The International Information & Library Review, 46(3–4), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2014.970061
Silva, E. G., Rego-Piva, L. M., & Guimarães, J. A. C. (2021). Scholarly communication offices as informative spaces in interection with univeristy libraries: Scope of action and offered services. Scire, 27(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.54886/SCIRE.V27I2.4775
Silveira, J. I., & Vanz, S. A. S. (2023). Guidelines for deposit, access and use of research data: proposal based on the analysis of international university data repositories. AtoZ, 12, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5380/ATOZ.V12I0.87331
Stern, D. (2014). Student embargoes within institutional repositories: Faculty early transparency concerns. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1080
Tapfuma, M. M., & Hoskins, R. G. (2019). Open science disrupting the status quo in academic libraries: A perspective of Zimbabwe. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(4), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.05.005
Ukwoma, S. C., & Ngulube, P. (2019). Obstacles to the utilization of institutional repositories by academics in higher education in Nigeria. Webology, 16(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.14704/web/v16i1/a183
Vollmer, T. (2022). Creative commons and open access in an academic library: Implementation, tools, policy and education. In J. Coates, V. Owen & S. Reilly (Eds.), Navigating Copyright for Libraries: Purpose and Scope (pp. 378–404). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110732009-018
Wilson, K., Huang, C. K., Montgomery, L., Neylon, C., Handcock, R. N., Ozaygen, A., & Roelofs, A. (2022). Changing the academic gender narrative through open access. Information Research, 10(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10030022
Copyright (c) 2025 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Articles published in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
