Repository policies in four higher education libraries in Surabaya, East Java

  • Ari Zuntriana Perpustakaan Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Dian Anesti Perpustakaan Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Mufid Mufid Perpustakaan Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Keywords: repository policies, e-theses repository, institutional repository governance

Abstract

Introduction. This research examines the electronic theses and dissertation repository policies at four universities in Surabaya, namely UIN Sunan Ampel, Universitas Airlangga, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, and Universitas Kristen Petra. It explores the policy formulation process and evaluates whether the existing policies have considered good repository governance practices, such as data protection, notice and take-down policy, and data reuse.

Data Collection Methods. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach, using interviews, policy documents, and writing guidelines as primary data sources.

Data analysis. Data was analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive analysis model, which consists of data collection, data reduction, data display, and conclusion.

Results and Discussion. The policy formulation process follows a top-down approach involving university rectors/vice rectors, library heads, and librarians. The top managements determine the publication model and embargo periods. However, repository policies remain incomplete, with some still verbally communicated rather than properly documented.

Conclusion. Repository policies are still heavily influenced by university leaders, so the focus is currently on access restrictions and embargoes to increase the number of publications, rather than improving governance. The role of librarians in raising awareness and advocating for open access is necessary.

References

Adam, U. A., & Kaur, K. (2021). Driving forces behind the management of Institutional Repositories: Qualitative evidences. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 26(3), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol26no3.2

Ali, A. F., & Saleem, Q. U. A. (2021). Open access resources as an opportunity for academic libraries during pandemic: A study. Library Philosophy & Practice, 1–20.

Anderson, R. (2018). Scholarly communication: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.

Arvelina, E., Tresnawaty, Y., & Gemalia, I. (2022). Evaluasi pemanfaatan aplikasi GDL (Ganesha Digital Library) sebagai aplikasi repositori di Politeknik Negeri Bandung. Jurnal Ilmu Informasi, Perpustakaan Dan Kearsipan, 24(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.7454/JIPK.v24i1.003

Bashir, S., Gul, S., Bashir, S., Nisa, N. T., & Ganaie, S. A. (2022). Evolution of institutional repositories: Managing institutional research output to remove the gap of academic elitism. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54(3), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211009592

Borgman, C. L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9963.001.0001

Darragh, J., Narlock, M. R., Burns, H., Cerda, P. A., Cowles, W., Delserone, L., Erickson, S., Herndon, J., Imker, H., Johnston, L. R., Lake, S., Lenard, M., Mohr, A. H., Moore, J., Petters, J., Pullen, B., Taylor, S., & Wham, B. (2024). Institutional data repositories are vital. Science, 385(6714), 1174–1174. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adr0789

Dawson, D., & Langrell, K. (2023). More obstacles for the graduate student author: Open access ETDs trigger plagiarism detectors. Journal of Graduate Librarianship, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.59942/2995-9063.1002

Dove, E., & Nayha, S. (2021). Tools, processes and actors: Introduction. In A. Ganguli-Mitra, A. Sorbie, C. McMillan, E. Dove, E. Postan, G. Laurie, & N. Sethi (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Health Research Regulation (pp. 99–102). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108620024.013

Fahey, A., Freestone, C., Russell, F., & Savage, C. (2016). Bridging the copyright and licensing knowledge gap [Report]. Deakin University. https://dro.deakin.edu.au/articles/report/Bridging_the_copyright_and_licensing_knowledge_gap/20916124/3

Gilliam, C., & Daoutis, C. (2019). Can openly accessible e- theses be published as monographs? A short survey of academic publishers. The Serials Librarian, 75(1–4), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2019.1589633

Hidayanto, A. N., Puspa, D., Soegiharto, A., & Munajat, Q. (2020). Data privacy, what still need consideration in online application system? Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 16(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.21609/jsi.v16i1.941

Holzman, A., & Lippincott, S. K. (2019). Libraries. In A. Phillips & M. Bhaskar (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Publishing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794202.013.19

Kirkman, N., & Haddow, G. (2021). Publisher embargoes and institutional repositories: A case study of journal articles subject to an Australian funder mandate. Information Research, 26(3), paper 907. https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper907

Kreutzer, T. (2015). Konten terbuka: Pedoman praktis penggunaan lisensi Creative Commons (A. Q. Sudharto, Trans.). Wikimedia Indonesia.

Kristianti, L. (2024, October 17). Dirjen Aptika pastikan UU PDP sudah berlaku sepenuhnya. Antara News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4404977/dirjen-aptika-pastikan-uu-pdp-sudah-berlaku-sepenuhnya

Loan, F. A., & Shah, U. Y. (2020). Global electronic thesis and dissertation repositories – collection diversity and management issues. Insights, 33(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.524

Logullo, P., Beyer, J. A. de, Kirtley, S., Schlüssel, M. M., & Collins, G. S. (2024). Open access journal publication in health and medical research and open science: Benefits, challenges and limitations. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 29(4), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112126

McKiernan, E. C., Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., McDougall, D., Nosek, B. A., Ram, K., Soderberg, C. K., Spies, J. R., Thaney, K., Updegrove, A., Woo, K. H., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife, 5, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800

Moreau, D., & Wiebels, K. (2023). Ten simple rules for designing and conducting undergraduate replication projects. PLOS Computational Biology, 19(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010957

Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction. The European Journal of General Practice, 23(1), 271–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375093

Nurohman, A., & Aprillilah, A. (2024). Riset kebijakan publikasi repositori institusi Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri Indonesia. Al-Kuttab : Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan, Informasi Dan Kearsipan, 6(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.24952/ktb.v6i1.10443

Pratama, Y. B. (2018). Kebijakan open access institutional repository: Studi multisitus pada 3 (tiga) perguruan tinggi negeri di Malang [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Brawijaya]. https://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/166078/

Priyanto, I. F. (2015). Readiness of Indonesian academic libraries for open access and open access repositories implementation: A Study on Indonesian open access repositories registered in OpenDOAR [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas]. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc804888/

Rai, P. (2024). For ‘all rights reserved’ to ‘some rights reserved’: Open licensing to scholarly publication. World Digital Libraries, 17(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.18329/09757597/2024/17103

Rasuli, B., Schöpfel, J., Boock, M., & Van Wyk, B. (2023). Access and impact barriers to academic publications: A global study of thesis and dissertation embargo policies. Online Information Review, 47(6), 1208–1222. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2022-0497

Rodliyah, U. (2023). Librarian’s perception of open access repository policy in Islamic State University Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 11(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v11i2.46758

Sandt, S. van de, Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Lavasa, A., & Petras, V. (2019). The definition of reuse. Data Science Journal, 18(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-022

Seaman, D. M. (2017). Leading across boundaries: Collaborative leadership and the institutional repository in research universities and liberal arts colleges [Doctoral dissertation, Simmons College]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1958944695

Tenny, S., Brannan, J. M., & Brannan, G. D. (2024). Qualitative study. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/

Turgut, Y. E., Aslan, A., & Denizalp, N. V. (2022). Academicians’ awareness, attitude, and use of open access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54(3), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211016509

Usman, H., & Akbar, P. S. (2024). Metodologi penelitian sosial (3rd ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Zhang, P. (2017). A content-linking-context model and automatic copyright verification in the notice-and-take-down procedures [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton]. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/416475/

Zuntriana, A. (2017). Advocating for open access: Open access advocacy practices in Indonesian higher education institutions and their impacts on the sustainability of institutional repositories [Master thesis, The University of Sheffield]. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/15748/

Published
2025-06-19
How to Cite
Zuntriana, A., Anesti, D., & Mufid, M. (2025). Repository policies in four higher education libraries in Surabaya, East Java. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 21(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v21i1.18020
Section
Articles