Tinjauan literatur argumentatif tentang kepemilikan data arsip digital non-fungible token (NFT) pada teknologi blockchain

  • Achmad Fachmi Universitas Indonesia
  • Nina Mayesti Departemen Ilmu Perpustakaan, Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya, Universitas Indonesia
Keywords: digital records, data ownership, non-fungible token, records authentication, blockchain


Introduction. NFT scheme is used to certify the authenticity of digital records. It is also to provide a code for the original (genuine) data recorded on the blockchain. NFT creates a single data that cannot be duplicated in digital records. The misuse of NFT authentication to illegally certify other people's data have become a problem.

Data Collection Methods. This study used an argumentative literature review with a qualitative approach. It used literature data sources from various fields related to the basic concepts of archival science as a basic analysis.

Data Analysis. The analysis process consisted of several stages, namely reading the reviewed literature, summarising, analysing, and synthesising them critically and deeply.

Results and Discussion. The concept of development related to data ownership issues can be formulated by collaborating with user communities, developers, and digital service designers (ecosystems). As a preventive measure, understanding the logistical consequences of data security threats was very helpful. This included authenticity, integrity, confidentiality, and authorisation, they served as important points to reduce risk.

Conclusion. The NFT concept continues to develop dynamically.  A more in-depth study and the involvement of archival science are necessary, thus, NFT scheme can build trust in digital records regarding the issue of data ownership.


Bal, M., & Ner, C. (2019). NFTracer: A non-fungible token tracking proof-of-concept using hyperledger fabric. Arxiv.Org. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.04795

Batista, D., Kim, H., Lemieux, V. L., Stancic, H., & Unnithan, C. (2021). Blockchains and provenance: How a technical system for tracing origins, ownership and authenticity can transform social trust. In Building Decentralized Trust (pp. 111–128). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54414-0_6

Batista, D., & Lemieux, V. (2019). Bounded and shielded: Assessing security aspects and trustworthiness of smart contracts. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes Du Congrès Annuel de l’ACSI. https://doi.org/10.29173/CAIS1063

Borglund, E., & Engvall, T. (2016). Authenticity in open data: Contributions from archival science. Interparestrust.Org, 1. https://interparestrust.org/assets/public/dissemination/WORKSHOPPAPERFINALOPENDATA_AUTHENTICITY.pdf

Clinten, B. (2021). Mengenal NFT, aset kripto yang tengah naik daun. Tekno.Kompas.Com. https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2021/03/15/15460097/mengenal-nft-aset-kripto-yang-tengah-naik-daun?page=all

Cornelius, K. (2020). Smart contracts as evidence: Trust, records, and the future of decentralized transactions. In J. Hunsinger, M. M. Allen, & L. Klastrup (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Internet Research (pp. 627–646). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1_28

Cornelius, K. (2021). Betraying Blockchain: Accountability, Transparency and Document Standards for Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Journal Information, 12(9), 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12090358

Das, D., Bose, P., Ruaro, N., & Kruegel, C. (2021). Understanding security issues in the NFT ecosystem. Arxiv.Org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08893

Demoulin, M., Bushey, J., & McLelland, R. (2018). How to assess cloud service contracts?: A checklist for trustworthy records in the cloud. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10766 LNCS, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_22

Deng, Z., Ren, Y., Liu, Y., Yin, X., Shen, Z., & Kim, H. J. (2019). Blockchain-based trusted electronic records preservation in cloud storage. Computers, Materials and Continua, 58(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.32604/CMC.2019.02967

Dhaulagiri, D. (2021). NFT dan seni kripto dianggap masa depan, kasus Kendra membuktikan ada lubang besar di sana. Whiteboard Journal. https://www.whiteboardjournal.com/ideas/art/nft-dan-seni-kripto-dianggap-masa-depan-kasus-kendra-membuktikan-ada-lubang-besar-di-sana/

Duff, W. (2011). Issues of authenticity, social accountability, and trust with electronic records. The Information Society, 17(4), 229–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722401753330823

Fan, G. (2018). Making better out of technologies: Responses of interpares to digital records management challenges. KDIR. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007230803870397

Findlay, C. (2017). Participatory cultures, trust technologies and decentralisation: Innovation opportunities for recordkeeping. Archives and Manuscripts, 45(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2017.1366864

Gibson, J. (2021). The thousand-and-second tale of NFTs, as foretold by Edgar Allan Poe. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 11(3), 249–269. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/11-3/qmjip.2021.03.00.xml

Gilliland, A. J., & Mckemmish, S. (2012). Recordkeeping metadata, the archival multiverse, and societal grand challenges. Dcpapers.Dublincore.Org, 106–115. https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3661

Gilliland, Rouche, N., Lindberg, L., & Evans, J. (2005). Towards a 21st century metadata infrastructure supporting the creation, preservation and use of trustworthy records: Developing the InterPARES 2 metadata schema registry. Archival Science, 5(1), 43–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9000-4

Information Resources Management Association. (2019). Web services: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (Information Resources Management Association (ed.); 1st editio). Engineering Science Reference.

Jeong, S. Y. (2021). Value of NFTs in the digital art sector and its market research [Sotheby’s Institute of Art New York]. https://digitalcommons.sia.edu/stu_theses/101

Lafountain, C. (2021). Non-fungible tokens, libraries, and publishers. Information Today, Inc. https://www.infotoday.com/OnlineSearcher/Articles/Features/NonFungible-Tokens-Libraries-and-Publishers-147856.shtml

Legault, M. (2021). A practitioner’s view on distributed storage systems: Overview, challenges and potential solutions. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(6), 32–41. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1448

Lemieux, V. L. (2016). Blockchain for recordkeeping: Help or hype? SSHRC Knowledge Competition, Canada, October. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309414276_Blockchain_for_Recordkeeping_Help_or_Hype

Lemieux, V. L. (2017). Blockchain and distributed ledgers as trusted recordkeeping systems. FTC. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Victoria-Lemieux/publication/317433591_Blockchain_and_Distributed_Ledgers_as_Trusted_Recordkeeping_Systems_An_Archival_Theoretic_Evaluation_Framework/links/593aa6450f7e9b3317f4d860/Blockchain-and-Distributed-Ledgers-as

Lemieux, V. L. (2021). Blockchain and recordkeeping. Computers, 10(135), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10110135

Mackenzie, S., & Bērziņa, D. (2021). NFTs: Digital things and their criminal lives. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 00(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590211039797

Munster, B. (2021). People are stealing art and turning it into NFTs. Vice.Com. https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7vxe7/people-are-stealing-art-and-turning-it-into-nfts

Namasudra, S., Deka, G. C., Johri, P., Hosseinpour, M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2020). The revolution of blockchain: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2020, 28(3), 1497–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11831-020-09426-0

Niranjanamurthy, M., Nithya, B. N., & Jagannatha, S. (2019). Analysis of blockchain technology: Pros, cons and SWOT. Cluster Computing, 22, 14743–14757. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10586-018-2387-5

Noor, M. U. (2020). Implementasi blockchain di dunia kearsipan: peluang, tantangan, solusi atau masalah baru? Khizanah Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, dan Kearsipan, 8(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v8i1a9

Peraturan Kepala Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 tentang pedoman autentikasi arsip elektronik, 30 (2011). https://jdih.anri.go.id/peraturan/Perka 20_2011 fix.pdf

Priyanto, I. F. (2013). Apa dan mengapa ilmu informasi? Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 1(1), 55–59. http://journal.unpad.ac.id/jkip/article/view/9611

Quirion, A. (2021). What is an NFT and why should archivists pay attention? Archeota, 7(1), 10–12. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/saasc_archeota/14/

Royal Society. (2018). Data ownership, rights and control: A reaching a common understanding. The Royal Society. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/data-governance/data-ownership-rights-and-controls-October-2018.pdf

Sabaliauskas, S., Kaukėnas, T., Gražulis, D., & Žilinskienė, N. (2021). Physical activity and self-regulation as a precondition for future thinking and sustainable development. LASE Journal of Sport Science, 12(1), 57–73. https://www.journal.lspa.lv/images/2021_2/LASE_COVID-updated.pdf#page=58

Singh, J., & Singh, P. (2021). Distributed ownership model for Non‐Fungible Tokens. In Smart and Sustainable Intelligent Systems (pp. 307–321). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119752134.ch22

Society of American Archivists. (2021). SAA dictionary: Electronic record. SAA. https://dictionary.archivists.org/entry/electronic-record.html

Society of American Archivists. (2022). SAA dictionary: Authentication. SAA. https://dictionary.archivists.org/entry/authentication.html

University of Alabama. (2019). Types of literature reviews - how to conduct a literature review - research guides at University of Alabama. https://guides.lib.ua.edu/c.php?g=39963&p=253698

Uribe, D., Waters, G., & Io, G. (2020). Privacy laws, genomic data and non-fungible tokens. The Journal of The British Blockchain Association, 3(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31585/JBBA-3-2-(5)2020

Wang, G., & Nixon, M. (2021). SoK. Proceedings of the 14th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing Companion, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492323.3495577

Wang, Li, R., Wang, Q., & Chen, S. (2021). Non-fungible token (NFT): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges. http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07447

Wentzel, A. (2018). A guide to argumentative research writing and thinking: Overcoming challenges (1st ed.). Routledge.

Wijesuriya, G., & Sweet, J. (2018). Revisiting authenticity in the Asian context. The International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property.

Woodall, A., & Ringel, S. (2020). Blockchain archival discourse: Trust and the imaginaries of digital preservation. New Media and Society Journal, 22(12), 2200–2217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819888756

How to Cite
Fachmi, A., & Mayesti, N. (2022). Tinjauan literatur argumentatif tentang kepemilikan data arsip digital non-fungible token (NFT) pada teknologi blockchain. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 18(1), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v18i1.3989