Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga

  • Anton Hermawan UKSW
  • Anggita Kristiasari Program Studi Perpustakaan dan Sains Informasi, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Fransiska N. Bhiju Program Studi Perpustakaan dan Sains Informasi, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Dona Manik Program Studi Perpustakaan dan Sains Informasi, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Keywords: instrument development, performance evaluation, performance evaluation instruments, librarian performance

Abstract

Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries.

Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing  performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed.

Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was >0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was > 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments.

Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments.

Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 ​​degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective.

References

Abdullah, M. (2014). Manajemen dan evaluasi kinerja karyawan. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.

Amstrong, M. (2009). Handbook of performamce management. London: Kogan Page.

Bangun, W. (2012). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Bacal, R. (2012). Performamce management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Diniaty, D., & Muhamad, F. (2014). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja pegawai Perpustakaan UIN Suska Riau. Jurnal Sains, Teknologi dan Industri, 11(2), 297-304.

Dessler, G. (2013).Human resource management. London: Pearson/ Prentice Hall Inc.

Evita, S.N., Wa Ode Z.M., & Raden, T.W.A. (2017). Penilaian kinerja karyawan dengan menggunakan metode Behaviorally Anchor Rating Scale dan Management by Objectives (studi kasus pada PT Qwords Company International). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Bisnis, 9 (1), 18-32.

Hartono, A.R., & Setiawardani, M. (2017). Pengaruh evaluasi kinerja terhadap komitmen organisasional karyawan. Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Investasi, 3(1), 73-85.

Herlina, A., & Anityasari, M. (2014). Perancangan sistem pengukuran kinerja UPT Perpustakaan ITS dengan metode Balanced Scorecard. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi XXI, Program Studi MMT-ITS, Surabaya 19 Juli.

Kristiyanti, M. (2012).Peran indikator kinerja dalam mengukur kinerja manajemen. Majalah Ilmiah Informatika, 3(3), 103-123.

Kreitner, R., & Angelo, K. (2010). Organizational behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kumentas, C.N. (2013). Pengaruh TQM, sistem pengukuran kinerja dan penghargaan terhadap

kinerja manajerial PT. Pos Indonesia. Jurnal EMBA, 1(3), 796-805.

Mathis, R.L., & John, H.J. (2011). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Noe, R., John, R.H., Barry, G & Patrick, M.W. (2010). Manajemen sumber daya manusia, mencapai keunggulan bersaing. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Rahadi, D.R. (2010). Manajemen kinerja sumber daya manusia. Malang: Tunggal Mandiri

Rivai, V., Ramly, M., Mutis, T., & Arafah, W. (2014). Manajemen sumber daya manusia untuk perusahaan dari teori ke praktik (edisi ke-3). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Saleh, A.R., & Komalasari, R. (2014). Manajemen perpustakaan. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Setiawan, R. (2014). Pengaruh evaluasi kinerja terhadap kepuasan kerja dengan kompensasi dan pengembangan karier sebagai variabel intervening pada PT X di Probolinggo. Jurnal Agora, 2 (1), 343-350.

Sofyani, H., & Akbar, R. (2015). Hubungan karakteristik pegawai pemerintah daerah dan implementasi sistem pengukuran kinerja: Perspektif ismorfisma institusional. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 19(2), 153-173.

Sujarweni, V.W. (2014). Metode penelitian: lengkap, praktis, dan mudah dipahami. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

Sugiyono. (2012).Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta

Sulaiman & Suprapto. (2019). Model evaluasi kinerja pustakawan sebagai dasar pengembangan profesionalisme pustakawan di PTKIN Indonesian. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 3 (1), 51-64.

Wirawan. (2015). Evaluasi kinerja sumber daya manusia: Teori, aplikasi dan penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

_______________. (2007). Undang-undang Nomor 43 tahun 2007 tentang perpustakaan.

Wijayanti, A & Supra, W. (2012). Evaluasi dan pengembangan sistem penilaian kinerja pada PT HKS. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 11(2), 1-14.

Published
2020-06-23
Section
Articles