Esplorasi website Perpustakaan Universitas Harvard, Universitas Gadjah Mada dan Universitas Telkom

  • Muhammad Rasyid Ridlo Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan
  • Robi Yoswan Zain Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan
  • Yesika Anggreini Br Ginting Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan
  • Yoandini Saputri Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan
Keywords: library website, university library, Harvard University Library


Introduction. This article evaluates library websites of world class universities in Indonesia from several aspects including features, responsibility, and speed. One library website overseas is explored as a reference: Harvard University.  

Data Collection Method. This is a literature study exploring features on library websites of Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) and Telkom University.

Data analysis. The study used Harvard University library website as a reference. The results were presented into tables to discuss library websites of UGM and Telkom University.

Results and Discussion. Harvard University library webiste has 21 features except gallery, UGM has 11 features and Telkom University has 12 features similar to Harvard University library webiste. Our result showed that Library website of UGM and Telkom University still need to be improved as required to be a world class university. All three websites has an adjustable display depending on devices in accessing websites. Those three websites were considered as responsive websites. Based on PageSpeed Insight, they showed good performance.

Conclusion.  Information on the websites are well-managed, informative, efficient, and accessible. Universities in Indonesia may use several overseas university library websites as a reference.


Abifarin, F. P., Imayah, S. A., & Olobashola, A. S. (2019). Design effectiveness of academic library websites: A comparison of university, polytechnic, and college sites in Nigeria. The Electronic Library, 37(3), 577–591.

Al-Qallaf, C. L., & Ridha, A. (2019). A comprehensive analysis of academic library websites: Design, navigation, content, services, and web 2.0 tools. International Information & Library Review, 51(2), 1–14.

Antasari, I. W. (2017). Membuat website/blog prefesional sebagai sarana penyebaran informasi sekolah. Media Pustakawan, 24(2), 25–30. v24i2.10

Arshad, A., & Ameen, K. (2015). Usage patterns of Punjab University Library website: A transactional log analysis study. The Electronic Library, 33(1), 65–74. 10.1108/el-12-2012-0161

Baba, S. J., & Ganaie, S. A. (2019). Utilization of library website(s) in higher educational institutions. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–9. libphilprac/2554/

Balaji, B. P., Vinay, M. S., Shalini, B. G., & Raju, J. S. M. (2018). An integrative review of web 3.0 in academic libraries. Library Hi Tech News, 35(4), 13–17. https://

Bridges, L., Rempel, H. G., & Griggs, K. (2010). Making the case for a fully mobile library website: From floor maps to the catalog. Reference Services Review, 38(2), 309–320.

Chanlin, L., & Hung, W. (2016). Usability and evaluation of a library mobile web site. The Electronic Library, 34(4).

George, C. A. (2005). Usability testing and design of a library website: An iterative approach. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 21(3), 167–180.

Google Developer. (2020). About PageSpeed Insights. https:// docs/insights/v5/about

Griggs, K., Bridges, L., & Rempel, H. (2011). Library/mobile: Tips on designing and developing mobile web sites. Code4Lib.

Hendrawan, J., & Perwitasari, I. D. (2019). Kajian konsep desain web responsive dalam perancangan website informasi dekranasda Kabupaten Samosir. Mantik Penusa, 3(2), 111–116.

Iqbal, M. (2012). Usability evaluation of Punjab University library website: A case study of University of Punjab, Lahore. Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries, 13(1), 1–11.

Kotler, P., & Lane, K. (2012). Marketing management. Pearson Education.

Lush, B. (2015). Managing accessible library web content. Advances in librarianship: Accessibility for persons with disabilities and the inclusive future of libraries, 40, 169–189.

Melfianora. (2019). Penulisan karya tulis ilmiah dengan studi literatur.

Moradi, S., Bagher, D. T., & Mirhosseini, Z. (2017). Designing a model for Web 2.0 technologies application in academic library websites. Information and Learning Science, 118(11/12), 596–617.

Noh, Y. (2015). Imagining library 4.0: creating a model for future libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 786–797. 2015.08.020

Pérez, C. F., & Caballero, I. M. (2014). Design and implementation of a weighted features model for the evaluation of archival websites. The Electronic Library, 32(2), 203–220.

Proweb Indonesia. (2011). Website adalah... website_adalah.html

Seeholzer, J., & Salem, J. A. (2011). Library on the go: A focus group study of the mobile web and the academic library. College & Research Libraries, 72(1), 9–20.

Skinner, D. G. (2012). A comparison of searching functionality of a vufind catalogue implementation and the traditional catalogue. Library Trends, 61(1), 208–217.

Stewart, S. G., & Newman, N. (2017). User services in the digital environment. Library Review, 66(4/5), 213–234.

Tella, A., & Oladapo, O. J. (2016). A comparative analysis of available features and web 2.0 tools on selected Nigerian and South African university library websites. The Electronic Library, 34(3), 504–521.

Zakiyah, E., & Karim, A. M. (2017). Performa website Perpustakaan Nasional di Asia Tenggara: studi webometrik. Jupiter, 16(1), 62–66. jupiter/article/view/4216

How to Cite
Ridlo, M. R., Zain, R. Y., Ginting, Y. A. B., & Saputri, Y. (2021). Esplorasi website Perpustakaan Universitas Harvard, Universitas Gadjah Mada dan Universitas Telkom. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 17(1), 12-26.